- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shiller Data: Real home prices for 1Q of 2011 less than they were in 1979.
Posted on 8/7/11 at 9:54 pm to kfizzle85
Posted on 8/7/11 at 9:54 pm to kfizzle85
quote:
BLS also derives data on the monthly pure rent for each renter unit in the survey for use in the rental equivalence computations. Pure rents are derived in a manner similar to that of economic rents, with some exceptions. Because owners pay for utilities separately, the pure rent excludes the cost of any utilities included in the contract rent. Because of this exclusion, BLS does not adjust the pure rents for changes in utilities.
Pure rent
Posted on 8/7/11 at 9:55 pm to kfizzle85
I love how this shite basically just goes completely unnoticed these days. What's another 5.1B?
Fannie Mae losses widen in 2Q, requests $5.1 billion [LINK]
Will they have another standoff when they start getting close to potentially breaching the 250B reserve in 5 years or whatever?
Fannie Mae losses widen in 2Q, requests $5.1 billion [LINK]
Will they have another standoff when they start getting close to potentially breaching the 250B reserve in 5 years or whatever?

Posted on 8/7/11 at 9:56 pm to kfizzle85
I would think they would take out Internet/cable, but I can't say for sure.
Posted on 8/7/11 at 9:56 pm to Doc Fenton
It seems that they do, based on the above quote I extracted.
Posted on 8/7/11 at 9:57 pm to LSUtoOmaha
Or at a rate of 1.57% annually since the 1Q of 2008.
Posted on 8/7/11 at 10:00 pm to Doc Fenton
Those rental numbers by quarter you listed weren't indexed in any way, were they? I assume they aren't in real terms.
Because if not, Kfizzle is essentailly correct in saying that rental prices have not increased in the last 5 years, relative to the CPI.
Because if not, Kfizzle is essentailly correct in saying that rental prices have not increased in the last 5 years, relative to the CPI.
This post was edited on 8/7/11 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 8/7/11 at 10:03 pm to LSUtoOmaha
I wouldn't expect that they have, given the whole housing crisis thing and what not. I'll go ahead and make a blanket statement that, without having any other information at my disposal at the moment and just general information, I would be flat out shocked if that wasn't the case.
Posted on 8/7/11 at 10:05 pm to LSUtoOmaha
Definitely not inflation-adjusted, as the rents from the 1960s should show.
Sure, kfizz is correct, but I'm just saying that rents were outpacing inflation (and home prices too?) in 2006 & 2007, to help refine our statements about the last 5 years.
Sure, kfizz is correct, but I'm just saying that rents were outpacing inflation (and home prices too?) in 2006 & 2007, to help refine our statements about the last 5 years.
Posted on 8/7/11 at 10:10 pm to Doc Fenton
Makes sense to me. So what we have learned:
In 2006-2007, home prices and rental prices were both increasing. Rental prices were increasing at a faster pace.
From 2006-2011, rental prices as a proportion of home prices have increased from 3.1% to 5.5%, approximately.
From 2006-2011, rental prices have basically been flat, but housing prices have plunged, when both are adjusted for inflation. Thus, renting has become more expensive to the alternative in the past five years, and by a significant margin.
In 2006-2007, home prices and rental prices were both increasing. Rental prices were increasing at a faster pace.
From 2006-2011, rental prices as a proportion of home prices have increased from 3.1% to 5.5%, approximately.
From 2006-2011, rental prices have basically been flat, but housing prices have plunged, when both are adjusted for inflation. Thus, renting has become more expensive to the alternative in the past five years, and by a significant margin.
Posted on 8/7/11 at 10:13 pm to Doc Fenton
Basically unchanged in inflation-adjusted terms...
2006-1Q = $9,333.29 / 198.7 (Feb CPI) = 46.97
2011-1Q = $10,601.41 / 221.309 (Feb CPI) = 47.90
You always have to be careful about CPI numbers and rent, for all the reasons that people write tons of papers about rent and OER and how much rent is weighted in CPI computations.
I've never really given all the debate the attention it deserves, just because it all seems so tedious.
In general, though, I think we can say that rent probably outpaced inflation in 2006 & 2007, and grew less than inflation in 2008, and just skidded around at near-zero growth along with inflation in 2009 & 2010.
2006-1Q = $9,333.29 / 198.7 (Feb CPI) = 46.97
2011-1Q = $10,601.41 / 221.309 (Feb CPI) = 47.90
You always have to be careful about CPI numbers and rent, for all the reasons that people write tons of papers about rent and OER and how much rent is weighted in CPI computations.
I've never really given all the debate the attention it deserves, just because it all seems so tedious.
In general, though, I think we can say that rent probably outpaced inflation in 2006 & 2007, and grew less than inflation in 2008, and just skidded around at near-zero growth along with inflation in 2009 & 2010.
This post was edited on 8/7/11 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 8/7/11 at 10:13 pm to LSUtoOmaha
Yep. That's pretty much the story.
EDIT: Although I should add that prices for sales of existing homes started falling, even in nominal terms, in 2006.
EDIT: Although I should add that prices for sales of existing homes started falling, even in nominal terms, in 2006.
This post was edited on 8/7/11 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 8/7/11 at 11:06 pm to Doc Fenton
Well, not to get off topic, but to get back on topic here... As these C-S have tended to go for the last 3 years, what is your outlook Doc? Has it changed since the last time we had a thread (I don't think we've had a real one in a few months)?
Posted on 8/7/11 at 11:34 pm to kfizzle85
The NAR data from June would tend to make me believe that the C-S indices will increase significantly through the C-S number for August set to be released around the end of October. How much so is anybody's guess, given that NAR numbers are often revised by quite a bit, and since the economy was so bad.
I can't remember exactly what I said in the last thread where we were discussing this, but I'm guessing that I was sticking to my usual line of thinking (or hoping) that home prices would hold in nominal terms, while being allowed to drop in real terms as inflation starts to kick in.
I was thinking that 2011 was going to be a bad year for GDP growth, but the data seems to be worse than I had thought. I still stick to my main thesis that nominal prices will mostly hold their since their spring 2009 bottoms, and do so for a number of years. Now, however, I must concede that 2011 will almost certainly be a year where averaged out prices will be slightly lower than in 2010. I don't think, for example, that the C-S index will go above its 2010 peak. But that's relatively minor in my view--I no longer think it can be said that housing is what's dragging down the rest of the economy. Rather, I think we've reached the point where the rest of the economy is what's dragging down housing.
Incredibly, the 58.1% employment rate for July 2011 was a new low for the post-bubble economy--even worse than the winter of 2009-2010. People pay too much attention to the 9.1% or 10.0% numbers, but it's the 58.1% number that matters most ... at least out of what's released by the BLS.
I can't remember exactly what I said in the last thread where we were discussing this, but I'm guessing that I was sticking to my usual line of thinking (or hoping) that home prices would hold in nominal terms, while being allowed to drop in real terms as inflation starts to kick in.
I was thinking that 2011 was going to be a bad year for GDP growth, but the data seems to be worse than I had thought. I still stick to my main thesis that nominal prices will mostly hold their since their spring 2009 bottoms, and do so for a number of years. Now, however, I must concede that 2011 will almost certainly be a year where averaged out prices will be slightly lower than in 2010. I don't think, for example, that the C-S index will go above its 2010 peak. But that's relatively minor in my view--I no longer think it can be said that housing is what's dragging down the rest of the economy. Rather, I think we've reached the point where the rest of the economy is what's dragging down housing.
Incredibly, the 58.1% employment rate for July 2011 was a new low for the post-bubble economy--even worse than the winter of 2009-2010. People pay too much attention to the 9.1% or 10.0% numbers, but it's the 58.1% number that matters most ... at least out of what's released by the BLS.
Posted on 8/8/11 at 11:48 am to Doc Fenton
NAR data is totally worthless. Corelogix, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae all put out data that is reliable unlike the crap that NAR puts out.
Posted on 8/8/11 at 11:50 am to MrLSU
quote:
Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae
quote:
reliable
Nice
Posted on 8/8/11 at 12:26 pm to MrLSU
You must have missed his Lawrence Yun comment earlier.
Posted on 8/8/11 at 12:51 pm to kfizzle85
quote:
I love how this shite basically just goes completely unnoticed these days.
What's another 5.1B? Fannie Mae losses widen in 2Q, requests $5.1 billion [LINK]
Will they have another standoff when they start getting close to potentially breaching the 250B reserve in 5 years or whatever?
Blee me, I am monitoring these frickers just like I am grinding BAC.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 9:11 am to Doc Fenton
quote:
I sort of expect that $184,300 median price figure for June to get revised. That's just a crazy jump from $169,300 in May. That can't be right. We might get a revision on Thursday, August 18.
Median price for June revised down $8700 to $175,600. Just a slight modification there...

Posted on 8/18/11 at 5:11 pm to Doc Fenton
Do mortgage rates factor into the Shiller index at all? 30 year rates are less than half what they were in 1979.
Back to top
