- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New ST play (5/21 11:41AM) - $CRNC
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:57 am
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:57 am
Cerence $CRNC
In our robotics basket, one of our running thesis is the idea that automotive technology companies have cross-applicable platforms to a world of physical AI. Modern cars are robots. Those cars engaging with people and their environments has direct relevance to "robots" doing the same thing.
Our first two picks in this vein were $VLN @ $1.57 and $BB $6C @ $.87 both of those picks have worked *extremely well* so far.
The company currently trades at a very reasonable valuation (13 forward P/E, 6.5x FCF, 1.5x sales) with an explosive chart on all time frames (daily consolidating around 200sma, weekly consolidating around 50sma).
In 2025, Cerence technology was used in *52% of all automobiles produced worldwide*. Yes... you read that right, over half of every single car produced. When you interact with a car with your voice ("Hey Mercedes", "Hey BMW", "Hey Audi", "Hey Jeep", etc.) Cerence is most likely involved.
So, what's the AI angle? Voice AI is Cerence’s core market. The company’s historical competency is speech-driven control in noisy, embedded, real-world environments.
That matters because the car is one of the most difficult consumer environments for voice AI:
- background road/wind/cabin noise
- multiple passengers speaking from different seats
- intermittent connectivity
- safety-sensitive user commands
- multi-language/localization requirements
- OEM-specific cockpit APIs
- privacy and data-retention constraints
Many of these issues are cross-applicable to robotics. Cerence’s edge/cloud hybrid architecture is well-suited to this domain. Pure cloud AI can be more flexible, but cloud-only systems can fail when connectivity is poor or latency is unacceptable. Pure edge systems are more reliable and private but historically less capable. Cerence is trying to combine both.
The company is leaning into this cross-application. On the last earnings call:
*"Outside of automotive, consistent with what we have said in the past, we are concentrating our efforts on high-value verticals where our strength in edge solutions, quality, reliability, privacy, and a domain-focused approach matter most, and where we believe we have a clear right to win.
Specifically, we are prioritizing dealership AI, commercial and industrial operations, and select IoT and robotics applications. Rather than selling voice as a standalone component, our approach is to deliver full vertical solutions combining voice, LLMs and SLMs, orchestration, and workflow integration into purpose-built vertical packs."*
Cerence xUI is directly relevant here. Management describes xUI as a next-generation AI interface that can use Cerence’s CaLLM models, third-party LLMs, third-party agents, real-time data, and vehicle context. The company said in Q1 FY26 that it showcased next-generation LLM-powered experiences and new AI agents serving users across the vehicle purchase and ownership journey; in Q2 FY26, it said xUI-powered vehicles were entering production
Cerence’s capabilities — far-field audio, speech understanding, context-aware interaction, edge inference, cloud orchestration, wake-word, multi-zone awareness, and task execution — are portable to other embodied interfaces. The company already says its technology can apply beyond passenger cars to areas like two-wheelers, commercial trucks, TVs, smart watches, kiosks, and industrial automation markets. That means that the platform has clear cross-application potential for *physical devices* in general.
This name will *cross-apply* to our robotics + voice AI basket, but will be listed as Voice AI because that is the most relevant angle here for the current tech stack.
Filled $10C Aug 21 '26 @ $1.85 avg. 1.5% weighting.
In our robotics basket, one of our running thesis is the idea that automotive technology companies have cross-applicable platforms to a world of physical AI. Modern cars are robots. Those cars engaging with people and their environments has direct relevance to "robots" doing the same thing.
Our first two picks in this vein were $VLN @ $1.57 and $BB $6C @ $.87 both of those picks have worked *extremely well* so far.
The company currently trades at a very reasonable valuation (13 forward P/E, 6.5x FCF, 1.5x sales) with an explosive chart on all time frames (daily consolidating around 200sma, weekly consolidating around 50sma).
In 2025, Cerence technology was used in *52% of all automobiles produced worldwide*. Yes... you read that right, over half of every single car produced. When you interact with a car with your voice ("Hey Mercedes", "Hey BMW", "Hey Audi", "Hey Jeep", etc.) Cerence is most likely involved.
So, what's the AI angle? Voice AI is Cerence’s core market. The company’s historical competency is speech-driven control in noisy, embedded, real-world environments.
That matters because the car is one of the most difficult consumer environments for voice AI:
- background road/wind/cabin noise
- multiple passengers speaking from different seats
- intermittent connectivity
- safety-sensitive user commands
- multi-language/localization requirements
- OEM-specific cockpit APIs
- privacy and data-retention constraints
Many of these issues are cross-applicable to robotics. Cerence’s edge/cloud hybrid architecture is well-suited to this domain. Pure cloud AI can be more flexible, but cloud-only systems can fail when connectivity is poor or latency is unacceptable. Pure edge systems are more reliable and private but historically less capable. Cerence is trying to combine both.
The company is leaning into this cross-application. On the last earnings call:
*"Outside of automotive, consistent with what we have said in the past, we are concentrating our efforts on high-value verticals where our strength in edge solutions, quality, reliability, privacy, and a domain-focused approach matter most, and where we believe we have a clear right to win.
Specifically, we are prioritizing dealership AI, commercial and industrial operations, and select IoT and robotics applications. Rather than selling voice as a standalone component, our approach is to deliver full vertical solutions combining voice, LLMs and SLMs, orchestration, and workflow integration into purpose-built vertical packs."*
Cerence xUI is directly relevant here. Management describes xUI as a next-generation AI interface that can use Cerence’s CaLLM models, third-party LLMs, third-party agents, real-time data, and vehicle context. The company said in Q1 FY26 that it showcased next-generation LLM-powered experiences and new AI agents serving users across the vehicle purchase and ownership journey; in Q2 FY26, it said xUI-powered vehicles were entering production
Cerence’s capabilities — far-field audio, speech understanding, context-aware interaction, edge inference, cloud orchestration, wake-word, multi-zone awareness, and task execution — are portable to other embodied interfaces. The company already says its technology can apply beyond passenger cars to areas like two-wheelers, commercial trucks, TVs, smart watches, kiosks, and industrial automation markets. That means that the platform has clear cross-application potential for *physical devices* in general.
This name will *cross-apply* to our robotics + voice AI basket, but will be listed as Voice AI because that is the most relevant angle here for the current tech stack.
Filled $10C Aug 21 '26 @ $1.85 avg. 1.5% weighting.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:14 am to itsbigmikey
The dude has been a cheat code lately.
I wish I would have had the patience with ENS, PLPC, AMKR, VIAV, etc. etc.
I may grab a few January $15s or just shares.
I wish I would have had the patience with ENS, PLPC, AMKR, VIAV, etc. etc.
I may grab a few January $15s or just shares.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:43 am to itsbigmikey
Assuming ST = short term, what’s the time horizon you expect?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:46 am to turkish
ST refers to Stock Talk. A discord I subscribe to
Posted on 5/23/26 at 9:28 am to itsbigmikey
Appreciate the info
I don’t understand how anyone can have more than $5,000 invested and not SIGN UP for an X account and follow stock talk.
It’s fricking irresponsible at this point.
At the very least, he opens you up to the relevant themes. Even if you’re not in the same names that he shares, you know where NOT to be, and how NOT to invest.
I don’t understand how anyone can have more than $5,000 invested and not SIGN UP for an X account and follow stock talk.
It’s fricking irresponsible at this point.
At the very least, he opens you up to the relevant themes. Even if you’re not in the same names that he shares, you know where NOT to be, and how NOT to invest.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 10:00 am to bayoubengals88
I guess I’ll have to post the performance of his picks soon.
You can hate, but it’ll only be because you love 14% returns
You can hate, but it’ll only be because you love 14% returns
Posted on 5/23/26 at 10:04 am to bayoubengals88
And look, I get it. If your household income is 250k or more and you can easily max out ALL the accounts, then 5-15% is great for you over 35 years.
That makes you a top 5 preventer easily by the way…
But some of us have to do some research and generate some alpha if we want a punchers chance at a decent second half of life, God willing.
That makes you a top 5 preventer easily by the way…
But some of us have to do some research and generate some alpha if we want a punchers chance at a decent second half of life, God willing.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 10:17 am to bayoubengals88
I’ll be following with a few call options Monday, hoping for early AM red
Posted on 5/23/26 at 10:18 am to bayoubengals88
Some people are happy with fairly steady and consistent market growth returns. It’s extremely low effort and effective. But you can absolutely beat the market over time as a small portfolio if you put in the work and follow a disciplined strategy. I prefer to put in the work. It’s a profitable hobby for me
Back to top
3







