Started By
Message

re: Let's play a game called Bitcoin Forensics

Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:05 am to
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65267 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:05 am to
quote:

which output address was the intended recipient?


Can't tell. Next question. I'm on a roll.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
82774 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:05 am to
quote:

WikiTiger


You really take all of the hate here for bitcoins personally, don't you?

Let it go, you are coming across more and more like a sandy vagina.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
130744 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:07 am to
quote:

It's an exercise to point out some features in the bitcoin system.

No, it's not.

It's an exercise for you to try and save face on this board by proving you are more familiar with bitcoin technology than most of us are.

I can't speak for other posters, but I concede that you are a bigger computer geek than me. That has been true of every computer geek I've ever hired.........or fired.

ETA:
quote:

But unfortunately, most of you don't actually have an interest in learning how bitcoin works.
Why should we waste our time learning about something that is irrelevant in our lives........and why is that "unfortunately"???
This post was edited on 3/22/13 at 12:38 pm
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65267 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:08 am to
My personal opinion is that he sees the benefit of bitcoin going away. That same benefit he's been touting for years. And that's a bit scary.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16702 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:16 am to
Didn't see this new thread.

I don't think anyone is disputing the fact that Bitcoin is anonymous as of now, but that wsj article linked shows that it is becoming monitored more and more. If the Bitcoin "banks" are now going to be required to disclose transaction information then anonymity is lessening.

I touched on this in the other thread, individuals are able to hold their own Bitcoin with anonymity because of the numerous ways to hide it as you've discussed before, just like cash, but if companies are going to be required to disclose transaction info then once you use your Bitcoin at one of these companies your anonymity is gone.

I think there will always be a market for Bitcoin, mainly the black market, for people who mine their own Bitcoin and solely exchange it amongst like users, ala cash with drug cartels and such. But once it becomes popular for mainstream use, the gov is going to stick their greedy hands into it which will defeat the purpose for such a currency.
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
81974 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:16 am to
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Can't tell.


Good answer.

Do you know why that is?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
130744 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:31 am to
quote:

My personal opinion is that he sees the benefit of bitcoin going away. That same benefit he's been touting for years. And that's a bit scary.
Good point.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65267 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Do you know why that is?


Magic?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
130744 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Do you know why that is?



Magic?


C'mon, let wiki have his fun.

He's dying to prove to us how much he knows about bitcoin.
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Magic?


Not quite.

Each bitcoin transaction, by default (although it can be turned off if the user chooses) sends bitcoins to at least 2 addresses. The excess is called "change" and it is moved to another address that the sender owns. This makes forensic examinations much more difficult.

For example, suppose you own address A and use it to send 3.5 bitcoins to address B

The transaction will actually look something like this:

A ----> B 3.5 bitcoins
A ----> C 1.5 bitcoins

where C is another address that you own.

And there's no real way to determine which recipient was the intended recipient unless you have personal knowledge of that transactions.

Posted by Cajun Revolution
Member since Apr 2009
44671 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 10:58 am to
How much money do you have invested in Bitcoins? If you say none, you should be banned from ever starting another Bitcoin thread. This is the 4th that I personally remember.
This post was edited on 3/22/13 at 10:59 am
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 11:05 am to
quote:

It only removes anonymity at that point in the system.


Isn't that pretty much all it takes? Or am I missing something?


And I clicked your link, and I have an answer for you:

121975415126520852623295216+26+326+529+626+236+56+2+62
3.232+622+632
.0
620
.32652+65+65+65+65+54654984716548965131GOfrick YOURSELF20TIMES46352128735412938150285618942/


Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
130744 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Each bitcoin transaction, by default (although it can be turned off if the user chooses) sends bitcoins to at least 2 addresses. The excess is called "change" and it is moved to another address that the sender owns. This makes forensic examinations much more difficult.

For example, suppose you own address A and use it to send 3.5 bitcoins to address B

The transaction will actually look something like this:

A ----> B 3.5 bitcoins
A ----> C 1.5 bitcoins

where C is another address that you own.


MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!! :jump1: :jump2:
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65267 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 11:36 am to
quote:

And there's no real way to determine which recipient was the intended recipient unless you have personal knowledge of that transactions.


Very informative. But Wiki, let's not take our eye off the ball quite yet. You preach anonymity in a transaction that is quickly becoming more transparent (or assumedly). But what happens when say I try to send $20,000 worth of bitcoin to my drug dealer for 20 kilos of cocaine? My anonymous transaction gets reported to the regulatory body. The exchange reports the transaction and now the regulators come to me to find out what I did with the "anonymous" money and why. Poof, there goes the "benefit" that you've preached for the longest. Everybody will see it and I assume the draw to the monetary instrument declines, hence driving prices down. Or even worse, they shut the exchanges down which makes the bitcoin worthless no?
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Very informative. But Wiki, let's not take our eye off the ball quite yet. You preach anonymity in a transaction that is quickly becoming more transparent (or assumedly). But what happens when say I try to send $20,000 worth of bitcoin to my drug dealer for 20 kilos of cocaine? My anonymous transaction gets reported to the regulatory body. The exchange reports the transaction and now the regulators come to me to find out what I did with the "anonymous" money and why. Poof, there goes the "benefit" that you've preached for the longest. Everybody will see it and I assume the draw to the monetary instrument declines, hence driving prices down.



The only things getting reported to regulatory agencies are the exchanges from USD to bitcoin or vice versa. And that's only if you go through a regulated exchange anyway.

Transactions within the bitcoin network itself are viewable by the public. Click here to see them in real time. What aids in anonymity is that it is extremely difficult, if not practically impossible to link bitcoin addresses to an individual or organization.

And remember, it's trivial for an individual to have a million addresses that each contain .1 bitcoins if they so choose.


quote:

Or even worse, they shut the exchanges down which makes the bitcoin worthless no?


What if people get paid in bitcoins, bypassing exchanges altogether? What if a person performs some coding work for someone and gets paid in bitcoin? Or to be a bit visionary, what if the bitcoin economy grows enough to where exchanges aren't really necessary anymore?


Posted by AUtigerNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2011
17149 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 11:53 am to
A few questions:

Can you show a picture of what this bitcoin looks like? Where do you store them? On your computer? Does it have a little bank where it tells you the value of your acct?

quote:

And there's no real way to determine which recipient was the intended recipient unless you have personal knowledge of that transactions.


If this type of currency becomes regulated and BSA/AML Regs are enforced, then this can be construed as laundering bitcoins.

Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Can you show a picture of what this bitcoin looks like? Where do you store them? On your computer? Does it have a little bank where it tells you the value of your acct?


This is what a bitcoin private key looks like:

5Kb8kLf9zgWQnogidDA76MzPL6TsZZY36hWXMssSzNydYXYB9KF



This is what a bitcoin public key (aka Bitcoin address) looks like:

1CC3X2gu58d6wXUWMffpuzN9JAfTUWu4Kj


quote:

The private key is mathematically related to the Bitcoin address, and is designed so that the Bitcoin address can be calculated from the private key, but importantly, the same cannot be done in reverse.




There are 2^256 possible private/public key combinations.


Bitcoins can be stored in a variety of manners, either on your own computer/mobile device, on a third party server, or even in your brain if you so choose. The storage of a bitcoin is essentially the storage of the private key.

There are many pieces of software out there that allow you to manage your bitcoins, and they act similarly to banks.
This post was edited on 3/22/13 at 12:07 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
130744 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

What if people get paid in bitcoins, bypassing exchanges altogether?
In that case 1099's or W2's will be required to be issued or the payer will be subject to income tax failure to report laws.

quote:

What if a person performs some coding work for someone and gets paid in bitcoin?
A 1099 will be required to be issued.

Or, are you implying that everyone who uses bitcoins is a criminal?

quote:

Or to be a bit visionary, what if the bitcoin economy grows enough to where exchanges aren't really necessary anymore?
That's not visionary. That's hallucinating.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 3/22/13 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Or to be a bit visionary, what if the bitcoin economy grows enough to where exchanges aren't really necessary anymore?



Can I buy some pot from you?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram