- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If one of the Democratic Candidates becomes President, what to do with your money?
Posted on 7/1/19 at 9:27 pm to naturegator83
Posted on 7/1/19 at 9:27 pm to naturegator83
Every single Dem candidate was in favor of free healthcare for illegal aliens; couple that with a lack of serious border security and the govt is going to have to raise a lot of money by some means. These are simply irrefutable facts whether people want to swallow it or not. Of course our markets and economy will be affected by this turn in philosophy and it will never be reversed if started.
Posted on 7/2/19 at 5:16 am to hungryone
quote:
Everyone should pay his/her fair share.
Paying 83 percent of all taxes isn’t already a fair share?
Should it be 100%
I’m not wealthy. And I don’t have the right to another man’s dollar.
Posted on 7/2/19 at 5:20 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Unless we become socialist then we’re screwed
Wake up. We are already pretty dam socialist.
Posted on 7/2/19 at 9:00 am to rowbear1922
quote:
If you took out your entire college on student loans and got a worthless degree, well that is your fault; not the taxpayers. I am all for making college cheaper by eliminating worthless degrees or, at the very least, let only private colleges offer certain programs and state colleges offer more STEM programs, which would make state institutions cheaper by eliminating entire departments.
This follows a narrative very popular on all of TD that I don’t think is true. There really is no such thing as worthless degree. I have business meetings everyday with people from all different industries. I always do as much research as I can about the person and their educational backgrounds vary so much. I scheduled one yesterday for August. I’m meeting with a woman who has a BA in English from UNC. She is a CEO of an utility company and makes $217k as a base salary per year.
This post was edited on 7/2/19 at 9:02 am
Posted on 7/2/19 at 9:31 am to Jp1LSU
quote:
This follows a narrative very popular on all of TD that I don’t think is true. There really is no such thing as worthless degree. I have business meetings everyday with people from all different industries. I always do as much research as I can about the person and their educational backgrounds vary so much. I scheduled one yesterday for August. I’m meeting with a woman who has a BA in English from UNC. She is a CEO of an utility company and makes $217k as a base salary per year.
This, x1000.
College isn't supposed to be job training. If you want direct ROI on skills, then go to trade school: plumbing, electrical, finish carpentry, instrumentation will pay off immediately, and the cost of education will be low. Jobs in skilled trades are abundant, and smart people are needed in those areas.
College is (supposed to be) about broader personal & intellectual development. IOW, you're learning to think, analyze, write, and speak/argue/support a position. You're training your mind to be flexible, adaptable, and orderly/logical. The traditional humanities and social sciences fields will develop a student's analytical skills.
Lots of people know folks who overpaid and were undereducated: who's fault is this? The student who didn't apply him/herself & was a lazy, bare-minimum scholar? The university, for admitting a student who wasn't really a very good prospect for serious education at 17 or 18? The curriculum, for lacking sufficient rigor in the material & assignments? The parents, for encouraging/allowing a student to borrow ridiculous sums instead of suggesting that a student live at home & work while earning a degree? Lots of factors impact this one.
But the "useless degrees" argument is an anti-intellectual stance reducing college to job training. They're NOT the same thing.
This post was edited on 7/2/19 at 10:18 am
Posted on 7/2/19 at 11:52 am to hungryone
quote:
But the "useless degrees" argument is an anti-intellectual stance reducing college to job training. They're NOT the same thing.
I realize they are not the same thing, but to say all degrees are worth the amount spent to get the degree is just not true.
Certain degrees have absolutely no nominal value upon graduation. Sure, if the person is willing to work hard, the graduate could go work, work hard and earn their way up, etc. but having a work ethic is essential no matter the degree.
If you spend $50-$100k or more for a job that never pays more than $30k, it's just not smart. Either way, less than 50% of working aged adults (25-65) have a college degree. Forgiving the debt means that the majority of Americans that do not have a college degree are paying for the minority. When I decided to go back to school after dropping out a few years before, it was to start a career I could not achieve without the degree. I made damn sure that the debt I was putting myself into was worth it after graduating.
Posted on 7/2/19 at 11:59 am to rowbear1922
quote:
If you spend $50-$100k or more for a job that never pays more than $30k, it's just not smart. Either way, less than 50% of working aged adults (25-65) have a college degree. Forgiving the debt means that the majority of Americans that do not have a college degree are paying for the minority.
We agree...it's dumb to overpay for a degree. But too many students are not going into debt over tuition--they're in debt b/c they live in an apartment & don't share a room or bathroom, drive a late model car, spend $$ on food/coffee/entertainment. IOW, esp in LA public schools where basic tuition is subsidized by the state for most attendees, you see rampant "lifestyle" spending by college students. Many parents aren't curbing this impulse--they're encouraging students to keep up with the Joneses.
Posted on 7/2/19 at 12:03 pm to hungryone
quote:
We agree...it's dumb to overpay for a degree. But too many students are not going into debt over tuition--they're in debt b/c they live in an apartment & don't share a room or bathroom, drive a late model car, spend $$ on food/coffee/entertainment. IOW, esp in LA public schools where basic tuition is subsidized by the state for most attendees, you see rampant "lifestyle" spending by college students. Many parents aren't curbing this impulse--they're encouraging students to keep up with the Joneses.
I do agree with that one. In BR, there are 2-3 new apartment complexes every Fall that cost $700+ for each bedroom. The complexes are generally thrown together and run down within a few years. The dorms are seen as beneath most students.
Posted on 7/2/19 at 12:16 pm to hungryone
“ Anti- intellectual” to point out that there is little/less demand for liberal arts degrees? Really?
Look, by all means get a history degree or a political science degree. I have both ( well double major ). They are worth attaining on their own merit. And it will likely help you throughout your professional life in one way or the other. But be prepared for the reality that awaits you. No need to sugarcoat reality. It’s a simple matter of supply and demand.
Additionally, I’m not sure that humanities/ social science are anywhere as rigorous as they used to be a generation ago. So I’m skeptical that they do as good of a job instilling these skill s as you say.
Look, by all means get a history degree or a political science degree. I have both ( well double major ). They are worth attaining on their own merit. And it will likely help you throughout your professional life in one way or the other. But be prepared for the reality that awaits you. No need to sugarcoat reality. It’s a simple matter of supply and demand.
Additionally, I’m not sure that humanities/ social science are anywhere as rigorous as they used to be a generation ago. So I’m skeptical that they do as good of a job instilling these skill s as you say.
Posted on 7/2/19 at 12:32 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Additionally, I’m not sure that humanities/ social science are anywhere as rigorous as they used to be a generation ago. So I’m skeptical that they do as good of a job instilling these skill s as you say.
I can’t speak to future but I can tell you that what I see everyday is that what people got a degree in and what they do for a living at age 50 are often very different. In fact I would think most people would say that what they are doing at age 50 is something they never would have suspected 25 years ago. In some cases what people are doing now didn’t exist 25 years ago.
Popular
Back to top

0






