Started By
Message

re: Best car for ~25k. What would you get?

Posted on 3/10/14 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84394 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

That can mitigate the damage to the bottom line, but you are eating all the new car depreciation - every time you buy.


Isn't the bottom line all that matters to you with regard to vehicle purchases?
Posted by BAMAisDIESEL09
Member since Jul 2012
2658 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 3:00 pm to
Ace--Hypothetically speaking, if youre telling me that you would pay $22k for a 3 year old car with 30k miles rather than buy the same car brand new for $22k I just dont know what to tell you. Respectfully, we will just agree to disagree.
This post was edited on 3/10/14 at 3:04 pm
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17116 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

you're acting like the back 2 years of either is equivalent to the first 2 years of the new car depreciation. They're not.


How much depreciation are you "eating" after two years on a 30k car?

How much money (total) are you saving if you don't have a car payment for two years?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84394 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

How much depreciation are you "eating" after two years on a 30k car?

How much money (total) are you saving if you don't have a car payment for two years?


Duh, just buy everything in cash so you don't have this problem.

At least I assume that will be his answer.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Question for those that own a Passat GTI. I was looking at getting one of these, but a consistent theme on car message boards was that the maintenance is a bitch and what you save on efficiency you pay for in new transmission. Anybody have any issues with like that with a Passat GTI (owning it after 5 years or so)?


we bought a subaru and a passat within a year of each other, granted 10+ years ago.

We drove the passat more but not a ton more.

You know how many major repairs (not covered under warranty) we had on the subaru? O. Still have it, and expect it to last a few more years.

On the passat, we had to replace the CV joints, replace front and rear brakes twice, replace part of the undercarriage twice, get transmission work done, and a few other things. When we got rid of it, it needed new brakes again! Now my wife does ride the brake but not 3x in 11 years. It also needed to get the heated seating fixed, the radio didn't work in the back seat, the drivers side mirror didn't adjust and it was due for the next schedule maintenance.

The car handled great, it just had a lot of problems and getting them fixed was always pricey. Hell, the air filter cost like $45.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89723 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

How much depreciation are you "eating" after two years on a 30k car?



Much less than the first 2 years and 30k miles. I'm not making this up.

quote:

How much money (total) are you saving if you don't have a car payment for two years?



At a certain point, you should be holding the cars long enough to never have a car payment - but it is mathematically impossible to spend more on the used, depreciated cars - per mile - that it is on new cars - all other things being equal.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84394 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

but it is mathematically impossible to spend more on the used, depreciated cars - per mile - that it is on new cars - all other things being equal.


Do factory rebates and negotiating a better deal on a new unit count as keeping things equal?

Because for the vehicle I own, you'd be a damn fool to buy a year or two old on compared to the deal I paid new. It literally would cost you more money to buy used than new.
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Do factory rebates and negotiating a better deal on a new unit count as keeping things equal? Because for the vehicle I own, you'd be a damn fool to buy a year or two old on compared to the deal I paid new. It literally would cost you more money to buy used than new.


Yes, the bottom line is all that matters. And yes, it's possible that you got a better deal with financing rebates etc; than you would have on a standard used car depending on the make model and dealer.

Especially if it was a dealer where the auto manufacturer has a volume commitment that they need to hit or else they lose their entire bonus

I may have missed it, but what did you get new and what was the deal you recieved?
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50379 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 4:02 pm to
You can get a used 335i with 25-50k miles easily for 25k.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84394 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

I may have missed it, but what did you get new and what was the deal you recieved?


Got a loaded F150 FX2 SuperCrew for $29,300. Sticker was $43,xxx. After almost 3 years, I still could sell it for around $25,000.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39629 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 4:07 pm to
How about this.

I need a new every day sedan. New or Used I don't care. Just get me a sweetheart deal.

Please, this shite sucks.

Preferably under 25k new. I prefer paying like 15k or something because I hate buying cars and never want to.

Someone do that for me and I'll never be a dick to you on TD again. Thanks.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84394 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 4:11 pm to
If I needed a sedan and had $25k to spend, this what I'd buy. 2014 Camry SE V6
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Someone do that for me and I'll never be a dick to you on TD again. Thanks.


hmmmm. pretty enticing.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39629 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

If I needed a sedan and had $25k to spend, this what I'd buy. 2014 Camry SE V6



Ya, I've been intrigued by their 0% APR for 72 months deal.

I really hate spending money on cars, so saying I have 25k "to spend" is sort of a misnomer. I just want a reasonable payment per month and not get shat on.

Of course, I lean towards getting used for the common perception they are better deals, but if they aren't, they aren't. I'm keeping the car for 20 years if new.

quote:

hmmmm. pretty enticing.



Reeling them in. I'm not even that dickish, but its the comfort in knowing I won't be that I hope makes all the difference.
This post was edited on 3/10/14 at 4:53 pm
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Got a loaded F150 FX2 SuperCrew for $29,300. Sticker was $43,xxx. After almost 3 years, I still could sell it for around $25,000.


$29.3K after or before rebates? How much down? assume 0%?

Sounds like a badass deal.....
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17116 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

but it is mathematically impossible to spend more on the used, depreciated cars - per mile - that it is on new cars - all other things being equal


No, it isn't.

If I buy a used car for 20k, finance it over four years at 4% and put 100k miles on it, I am paying roughly 21.7 cents/mile

The break even point under that scenario for buying a new car at 30k at 0% is ~138k miles...far from "mathematically impossible".

Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

No, it isn't. If I buy a used car for 20k, finance it over four years at 4% and put 100k miles on it, I am paying roughly 21.7 cents/mile The break even point under that scenario for buying a new car at 30k at 0% is ~138k miles...far from "mathematically impossible".


Wait what? $20K in financing, 4% financing and four year loan is a $460.59 per month assuming you didn't put anything down.

The present value of 4 years of monthly payments a 0% rate is $22,108.12. In other words it gets you $2,108.12 more over 4 years. That =/= $10,000 more in purchasing power.

That being said, there are other variables to consider: MPG, Scheduled maintenance (often times a newer vehicle comes with free maint) trim level etc; It's definately not mathematically impossible for it to work out more positive especially if you're working with a dealer that is about to get a $1M bonus from the manufacturer for hitting your volume commitment and he is 10 cars short of meeting that commitment.

Also depends on what type of car you want, and what used car inventory is in your area.

Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17116 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Wait what?


I am talking about buying a used car for 20k (two years old 25-45k miles) vs. brand new for 30k.
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:03 pm to
Yeah, I know that's what you were saying.

I think your math is off: $20k financed over 4 years at 5% is $460.59 per month. At 0% it would be $22,108.12.

$30k financed over 4 years is $625.00 per month.

One is $7,500 a year and one is $5,527 a year?

Are you saying that the value at which you can sell the car you bought new which now has 100k miles on it is worth $16,891 and the car which you could have bought used has 130k miles on it would be worth $9,891?

Just as a check, here's a couple of 2010 models that were worth $30k at sale:
1) Ford mustang GT: I could only find two within 200 miles of my area with 90k miles on them, and they ranged from $12k to $14k
2) Honda Accord V6 Coupe: Same deal, range from $11k to $12k


The difference in $10K in additional cost and 5% less on financing is $7,891. I'm confused by your post because if I'm paying $20k for a used car, and a 2010 model that sold for $30k is now worth $12k, that means that in 2010, if I decided to buy a 2008 model, it would only be worth $4,108. This is assuming that I bought it with 30k miles on it.

I'm confused because you appear to be stating that you are comparing 2 equal cars, one brand new and one a few years old, but the math doesn't match what I found in reality.

Even with $1000 in additional maintenance each year it only closes the gap by 1/2. I could buy your argument if you were saying that you basically break even and a 2008 accord in 2010 was worth $20k, but you spent $30k on the new one, and the one with 130k miles on it is worth 8k and the one with 100k miles on it is worth 12k. That said, that doesn't appear to be what you're saying? What am I missing?



Posted by matthew25
Member since Jun 2012
9425 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:42 pm to
Why not a Pathfinder for $15,000 or so?

Check ebay or autotrader.com
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram