Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Any updates on flex-fuel rebates?

Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:07 am
Posted by dwr353
Member since Oct 2007
2130 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:07 am
I was wondering if anyone had recent news on the review process on the rebates from the state. Any links for lawyers for a class action suit if not paid? Thanks
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14414 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:33 am to
You bought a truck between 2009 and 2011 and haven't claimed it yet?

Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:36 am to
I just want to know what law has changed to disallow it

I got it for my truck purchased in 2010

Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14414 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:46 am to
quote:

I just want to know what law has changed to disallow it I got it for my truck purchased in 2010


You can go for it. If you haven't yet, you should before the end of the year. They haven't issued a final ruling yet but odd's are you're going to get to keep it.

Btw, I hope that any of you that claimed the credit don't bitch about welfare abusers. I understand it'd be tough to turn it down, but you're really on the same side of those that exploit faulty Govt programs.

inb4frickemiftheydoitIwilltoo
Posted by dwr353
Member since Oct 2007
2130 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:10 am to
I claimed it in June. Just wondering when state was going to rule.
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14414 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:12 am to
quote:

I claimed it in June. Just wondering when state was going to rule


Last I heard the ruling was somewhere around the end of Dec. The 20th maybe?
Posted by dwr353
Member since Oct 2007
2130 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:37 pm to
thanks
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Btw, I hope that any of you that claimed the credit don't bitch about welfare abusers. I understand it'd be tough to turn it down, but you're really on the same side of those that exploit faulty Govt programs.


I think it's a little different

It's a tax loophole which a lot of higher income people are always looking for


Deliberately lying about income or masking income to qualify for govt assistance is a little different, especially when it's a lifestyle, not a one time bonus
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14414 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

It's a tax loophole which a lot of higher income people are always looking for Deliberately lying about income or masking income to qualify for govt assistance is a little different, especially when it's a lifestyle, not a one time bonus


You're right, its not lying. I should've been clearer with my intent there. I'm speaking more to those that could work but maybe choose not to or have more kids to get more welfare checks.

Regardless, I totally understand the temptation and am not judging, but to be honest if you are critical of those that take advantage of the system then you have to admit its pretty hypocritical to take the fuel credit.
Posted by SippyCup
Gulf Coast
Member since Sep 2008
6138 posts
Posted on 12/20/12 at 2:46 pm to
An emergency rule was issued by former Secretary of Revenue Cynthia Bridges on April 30, 2012, that expanded the scope of R.S. 47:6035 to allow Louisiana taxpayers to claim tax credits for the purchase of flex-fuel vehicles;



§ The emergency rule issued by former Secretary Bridges was not in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA);



§ Since the emergency rule was not issued in accordance with the APA, the rule was rescinded by the Governor on June 14, 2012;



§ Louisiana Department of Revenue (LDR) issued a statement on June 19, 2012 that indicated all claims under the Alternative Fuel Tax Credit Program postmarked on or before June 14, 2012, would be honored;



§ After the governor rescinded the previous emergency rule, LDR initiated the formal rule-making process in full accordance with all APA requirements, and in consultation with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR);



§ The published rule (effective today - December 20, 2012) clarifies the legislative intent of R.S. 47:6035 and reflects the legislative record of deliberations prior to final passage of the Act;



§ Between June 14, 2012, and December 17, 2012, all claims received and held by LDR total approximately $11.2M;



§ Of the $11.2M currently held by LDR, approximately $9M relates directly to flex-fuel vehicles.



§ No credits will be allowed for any claim related to flex-fuel vehicles received by LDR after June 14, 2012;



§ Vehicles that operate on both alternative fuel and petroleum based fuel from the same tank will be disallowed for the credit;



§ Flex-fuel vehicles are not eligible for the tax credit;



§ Claims that continue to qualify for the tax credit under the new rule (LAC 61:I.913) include:



o fueling stations

o vehicle conversions

o vehicles that operate on an alternative fuel from a separate tank that does not burn petroleum gasoline or petroleum diesel;



§ Analysis is ongoing regarding a final annual financial estimate to the state as to the number of applications received by LDR after June 14, 2012.

Posted by basiletiger
lafayette, la.
Member since Aug 2007
2141 posts
Posted on 12/20/12 at 8:41 pm to
If you haven't received it you won't be receiving it. This credit was the most insane tax credit in the history of insane tax credits. There was no cost associated with vehicles being "flex fuel vehicles". The state screwed up with giving out this and paid out entirely too much money for something that no one should have ever received. People didn't pay extra money for vehicles with "flex fuel capabilities". It was a joke. If you didn't get your money, you won't be getting it.
Posted by LSUTiger13
Morgan City
Member since Feb 2004
23 posts
Posted on 12/21/12 at 8:17 pm to
This was a very poorly written law which includes flex fuel vehicles based on the black letter of the law. The fact that LDR is saying that refunds will not be issued after the June date is completely absurd. This would lead to an inequitable treatment of individuals who have the same right to the credit as those individuals who filed returns prior to the June date. This will definitely be settled through the court system before it is all finished.
Posted by basiletiger
lafayette, la.
Member since Aug 2007
2141 posts
Posted on 12/21/12 at 9:41 pm to
There isn't any money left available for the credit. How they paid all that money in the first place blows my mind.
Posted by BallyHOO
Member since Oct 2005
6845 posts
Posted on 12/24/12 at 12:27 am to
Never got mine
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram