- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/26/11 at 9:44 am to LSURussian
$79 income from operations / $10,876 net sales
pg 4 10q
pg 4 10q
Posted on 10/26/11 at 9:46 am to Tiger JJ
That will teach those frickers to not give me the $75 credit that went into effect the day after I bought a XBox 360 Kinect bundle.
How does my arse taste now, Bezos?
How does my arse taste now, Bezos?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 9:48 am to Gorgeous
Don't they make something like 50% of their net income in the fourth quarter?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 10:14 am to Gorgeous
quote:
No business model should strive for a 0.7% operating margin. Margins were pathetic compared to historical performance and other e-commerce corporations(though Amazon has no true comp). A company with the branding and scale of Amazon shouldn't be fighting to break even.
What other e-commerce corporations are you comparing it to? Seriously, this is not a facetious question. While it is pathetic compared to historical performance, I don't understand why you don't agree that its been totally beaten down in this particular quarter by the things that management stated. Obviously if you scale up your costs and the revenues don't follow as expected, that's one thing, but given the holidays AND the Fire, it seems clear to me on an operational basis why this would occur this quarter, and why you would not expect it to be ongoing. Since it seems you feel like this might be an inflection point of some sort, I'd definitely like to hear why you think that. Again, not facetious, I want to know what it is you're seeing that I am not.
quote:
Shipping costs and revenue are broken out on page 21 of the 10-Q. Of course, Amazon's shipping costs are always going to be higher than shipping revenue due to the myriad of promotions they run (Free shipping for $25+, year-long student and mother trials for Amazon prime, etc). But net shipping costs as a % of revenue increasing nearly 30% YoY is concering.
:shakesfist: The Q wasn't up when I looked yesterday, just the 8-K. Thanks. I don't have any disagreement with that point at all, that is definitely something to focus on in the future.
quote:
Cash flow is definitely more important than income. But to explain why it dropped 10%+, the market is severely punishing momentum stocks (Netflix, First Solar, Green Mountain) that aren't meeting revenue and growth estimates.
Netflix = because their subscriber base blew up when its supposed to be skyrocketing quarter over quarter, and their CEO is a scatterbrained box of rocks.
First Solar = I know absolutely nothing about whatsoever.
Green Mountain = two words, David Einhorn. Doesn't matter if he is right or wrong, he definitely has enough influence to move markets.
At least in the case of the first and the last, there's clearly something affecting those stocks other than purely financial performance.
I'm not disregarding that they fell slightly short of analyst estimates for revenue growth, but missing by a mere $60M out of $11B doesn't seem to augur for a 15 percent rip, especially given that the estimates in FY12/13 are significantly lower than current period estimates. I also don't follow AMZN so I have no idea what their history is in terms of beats, so I have no frame of reference for that other than my personal outlook. If they're AAPL like in their projections and beats, I would have to agree with you.
eta: Great conversation btw, you should post more often.
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 10:18 am
Posted on 10/26/11 at 10:36 am to Gorgeous
quote:
A company with the branding and scale of Amazon shouldn't be fighting to break even.
They have that brand and scale because their margins are so thin. I find myself buying more and more stuff from Amazon lately, both personal and business.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 10:45 am to TigerinATL
I buy pretty much everything off of Amazon, but that's just out of habit. The name of the game is volume, to be the low-cost provider, just like WMT. The structure is different, but the concept is the same (and so are the margins).
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:52 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
They have that brand and scale because their margins are so thin.
And because most people can avoid sales tax on their purchases.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:56 pm to tims0912367
Down another 12 percent today, forward P/E to 63. 
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 12:59 pm to kfizzle85
quote:
Down another 11 percent today.
Still over $200 though. It was down from a recent high of $220 to around $180 just a few weeks ago before zooming to $240.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 1:06 pm to tims0912367
I'm not a technicals person, Baylor is your guy for that.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 2:32 pm to kfizzle85
Some of the comps I looked at range from eBay (e-Commerce) to Barnes and Nobles (Books) to Google (Internet Company).
None are anywhere near perfect as Amazon seems to be the amalgamation of all three. But what I'm trying to say is the margins are already slim in a normalized operating environment (~3-5% historically) and no amount of fulfillment and marketing costs should justify such thin margins.
The point I'm trying to make it that sales and earnings have been diverging over the past few quarters. Eventually (and I think that time is now), investors will start to focus on earnings gains rather than revenue gains. No more passes for outsized investment spend that isn't translating into profits.
In short, Amazon is accelerating investment spending faster than revenue growth. Not my type of company even if the spending is somewhat justified for the buildout of Kindle Fire. I love both Netflix and Amazon as a consumer; hate them as companies.
Yeah I'll try to post more often but banking is killing me
None are anywhere near perfect as Amazon seems to be the amalgamation of all three. But what I'm trying to say is the margins are already slim in a normalized operating environment (~3-5% historically) and no amount of fulfillment and marketing costs should justify such thin margins.
The point I'm trying to make it that sales and earnings have been diverging over the past few quarters. Eventually (and I think that time is now), investors will start to focus on earnings gains rather than revenue gains. No more passes for outsized investment spend that isn't translating into profits.
In short, Amazon is accelerating investment spending faster than revenue growth. Not my type of company even if the spending is somewhat justified for the buildout of Kindle Fire. I love both Netflix and Amazon as a consumer; hate them as companies.
Yeah I'll try to post more often but banking is killing me
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:18 pm to Gorgeous
quote:
The point I'm trying to make it that sales and earnings have been diverging over the past few quarters. Eventually (and I think that time is now), investors will start to focus on earnings gains rather than revenue gains. No more passes for outsized investment spend that isn't translating into profits.
In short, Amazon is accelerating investment spending faster than revenue growth. Not my type of company even if the spending is somewhat justified for the buildout of Kindle Fire. I love both Netflix and Amazon as a consumer; hate them as companies.
Can't argue with that, operating margin has definitely been on a downward trend for the past couple of quarters, and it appears any cash flow metric I look at it is so all over the place its pretty useless for any kind of analysis. I wasn't aware of this, as I said, I don't really follow them, so I have to agree with your position. It will certainly be interesting to see if all that investment translates into something. I don't think its a great company, it just seemed like the drop-off was unjustified, but it looks like I was wrong.
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:32 pm to Gorgeous
quote:
Yeah I'll try to post more often but banking is killing me
In NY.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:38 pm to kfizzle85
Depends on your group really. The first year is literal torture. I'm in my second year and it's not that bad. You get faster and progress up the learning curve pretty quickly after 6 or so months.
If you're still working 100+ hours weekly in your second year as an analyst, you're either in a severely understaffed group, an incredible economic climate (which will make it all worth it come bonus time), or just flat-out slow.
If you're still working 100+ hours weekly in your second year as an analyst, you're either in a severely understaffed group, an incredible economic climate (which will make it all worth it come bonus time), or just flat-out slow.
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:51 pm to Gorgeous
Yeah that's not my style, I'm trying to work my way into a research position, not IB. Keep hustlin bro. 
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 3:54 pm to kfizzle85
Nice. I'm trying to get out of here in June and get to a hedge fund. 
Posted on 10/26/11 at 4:29 pm to Gorgeous
I was going to ask what your exit plan was, what sector are you in?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 6:01 pm to Gorgeous
I really appreciate the input, man. I'd love to hear some of your thoughts on the healthcare sector when you find some time to post. 
Popular
Back to top


1



