Started By
Message

re: 401k vs roth 401K contributions

Posted on 2/1/19 at 10:44 am to
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20440 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

And for all the people saying "who knows where taxes will be in 20 years?" I'll give you a hint. Congress is trying to raise your taxes now.


Since taxes were invented, this has been said. I've heard this for 20 years since I started investing. They've gone up and down.

Again, even if they go up. How much is it worth to pay now instead of later?
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 10:50 am to
I mean it’s really 50/50. If taxes are the same then there’s no change either way correct?
Posted by CoachMoorGut
Member since Sep 2018
725 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Again, even if they go up. How much is it worth to pay now instead of later?


Depends on where you're at now, where you think you'll go, and where you tax rates will be. I'm personally under the opinion that young professionals should prioritize Roth. I believe this because I believe our government will continue the trend of expanding instead of shrinking, and will want more money eventually.

If you're retiring in a decade I think it's better to take it now. If it's in twenty years it's a decision, but I'd lean Roth.

I certainly agree with your earlier statement though, that you shouldn't put all your eggs in one basket.
Posted by juice4lsu
Member since Dec 2007
3695 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 11:18 am to
The more years you have until retirement the more beneficial the Roth option will be to you. Why? Because the more compounding/time your money will be invested.

Here's an example:

Let's say you are 35 and you will retire at 65. If you get a 7% annualized return your money will double every 10 years, or 3 times until you retire. So let's say you max at $19K. Would you rather pay tax today on $19K or pay tax on $152K ($19K doubled 3 times) later? If your money doesn't have the time to compound then this calculation isn't as impactful.

Another consideration is that taxes are essentially on sale for the next 7 years or so since the recent tax legislation.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20440 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 11:21 am to
quote:

I mean it’s really 50/50. If taxes are the same then there’s no change either way correct?


Not really. Because its not fair to say I'll put $15k in a roth or $15k in a regular 401k, as that makes no sense. If you are 25% tax bracket, then its $15k in Roth 401k or $18,750 in a 401k.

So now, 30 years down the road would you rather be taxed the same on 25% more money or have no taxes on 25% less money?

I just personally would rather more money that I have to manage the taxes on, then less money and no taxes. I understand where others prefer the other way though.

There's always going to be taxes, in some form or fashion.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 11:23 am to
LINK


The difference also lies in the fact that someone will most likely be investing different amounts TODAY between traditional and Roth options. You can’t say oh 5,000 in a Roth today vs 5,000 in a traditional account in a truly fair assessment.
This post was edited on 2/1/19 at 11:24 am
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20440 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 12:38 pm to
quote:


The difference also lies in the fact that someone will most likely be investing different amounts TODAY between traditional and Roth options. You can’t say oh 5,000 in a Roth today vs 5,000 in a traditional account in a truly fair assessment.


Exactly. On face without a doubt $19k in a roth is better than $19k in a trad 401k. BUt that's not an apples to apples comparison.

But I will say, for the average person myself included at times, we would be better off simply having that same amount pulled from our paycheck every 2 weeks then overthinking it and blowing it on some other crap we likely don't need.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14178 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 12:40 pm to
I know we can’t predict the future but I have a hard time thinking taxes in 10-20 years could be lower or even equal to where we are now. I don’t see how this could be possible given the trend with govt obligations and shifting political environment.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20440 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

I know we can’t predict the future but I have a hard time thinking taxes in 10-20 years could be lower or even equal to where we are now. I don’t see how this could be possible given the trend with govt obligations and shifting political environment.


Again though, my grandfather probably said this in the 60s.

Let's say they are higher though, I mean what's realistic? At what point is it worth paying your taxes now over keeping the money for 20 years? 5% higher? I'll keep my money. 10% higher? I'd still keep my money.

What are the chances taxes are 15% or more? I mean we really think the 20% tax rate now will be 35% in 20 years?

I'll tell you the only thing I know is guaranteed. If you pay your taxes now instead of in 20 years, you aren't getting that money back. So that's a big risk to take imo.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14178 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 2:12 pm to
I’ve never heard it put that way...makes a lot of sense.
Posted by Breadcrumbs
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2005
2982 posts
Posted on 2/2/19 at 1:37 am to
I don't know where taxes will be when I'm in retirement. But, I'd like access to a tax free pool of money (Roth) to use in retirement for big purchases like a new car, roof, a/c, vacation etc. I'll draw my regular living expenses from my taxable retirement account and then extras from Roth so I don't potentially raise my tax rates/bracket in the years I need to pay for those extras. Therefore, I save a little into the Roth 401k and will likely stop when I have say $100-150,000 saved. I also do a back-door Roth on top of my 401k and max out my health savings account which becomes a retirement account at age 65.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17979 posts
Posted on 2/4/19 at 8:53 am to
quote:

The difference also lies in the fact that someone will most likely be investing different amounts TODAY between traditional and Roth options. You can’t say oh 5,000 in a Roth today vs 5,000 in a traditional account in a truly fair assessment.


Yup. This often gets overlooked. If you are in the 22% tax bracket, you have to make $6,410 to actually invest $5,000 into a Roth.

The more I look at it, I think one factor that doesn't get enough attention is that all the money you put in to a Roth now gets taxed at your marginal rate before putting it in. The taxes you pay on a traditional in retirement will be your effective rate, not the marginal rate.

So many things to look at.
This post was edited on 2/4/19 at 8:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram