- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would the Sugar Bowl take ND over LSU???
Posted on 11/6/12 at 2:25 pm to TigerKnights
Posted on 11/6/12 at 2:25 pm to TigerKnights
quote:
What about Bama losing to A&M. Then winning the SEC. Then Bama vs LSU rematch for the Sugar Bowl.
Florida HAS TO LOSE to FSU for any discussion of LSU in the BCS to mean anything
1
Posted on 11/6/12 at 2:26 pm to Tiger Voodoo
I wouldn't mind the Fiesta, just don't want the Sugar or Orange. Really hoping we meet Nebraska in the Rose. 
Posted on 11/6/12 at 2:31 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
The SEC does NOT have to take an SEC school if they lose the SEC Champ, which they would with Alabama being #1.
This. Look at last year. LSU is a conservative pick if you're the Sugar Bowl--you fill seats but not necessarily hotel rooms and everything else. ND would make more money if the choice was between the two.
Posted on 11/6/12 at 2:57 pm to Rouge
quote:
Florida HAS TO LOSE to FSU for any discussion of LSU in the BCS to mean anything
Absolutely. This whole thread is assuming UF loses to FSU, and Bama beats Georgia in SECCG.
Also, A&M has to lose to Bama. If A&M beats Bama, but Bama goes to Atlanta and beats Georgia, I think A&M would be very attractive to the Fiesta Bowl and the Sugar Bowl as an at large.
Either of those bowls would very much consider A&M over LSU. WOuld be interesting.
That said, I would gladly take a Cotton Bowl or Cap 1 bid if it meant A&M beat Bama on Saturday
Posted on 11/6/12 at 3:31 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
quote:
This. Look at last year.
The Sugar Bowl could not take an SEC last year since 2 SEC teams were in the BCS CG. But no, they don't have to take an SEC team to replace Bama.
Posted on 11/6/12 at 3:42 pm to H-Town Tiger
Rose Bowl would be so awesome. impossible i know, awesome to dream.
Posted on 11/6/12 at 4:15 pm to Tigerbiscuits
quote:
Rose Bowl would be so awesome. impossible i know, awesome to dream.
Agreed. The Rose Bowl is so committed to keeping their "traditional rivals" together. I would assume the highest ranked PAC12 team would be Oregon St playing Nebraska though.
Posted on 11/6/12 at 4:19 pm to TigerScratch
The Rose Bowl can only take an eligible Pac 12 team to replace Oregon if the Ducks are in the BCS CG. They have to be in the top 14 or 16 i forget, to be eligible. If OSU loses to Oregon and 1 other game they will not be in the top 14/16
Posted on 11/6/12 at 5:09 pm to Tiger Voodoo
in a heartbeat. their mission is and always has been to fill new orleans hotels and restraunts. they would not be doing their job if they don't.
Posted on 11/6/12 at 5:10 pm to namvet6566
quote:
In my opinion there is no stupid question,
Correct ... no stupid questions, only stupid people.
Oh, and I don't know about the Sugar, but I know the Cotton Bowl would take ND over LSU.
Posted on 11/6/12 at 5:16 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
I usually don't get so fired up but he just so so wrong.
Not only was he clearly wrong, as anyone who watched last years' Sugar Bowl would know, but he was a complete a-hole about it
Posted on 11/6/12 at 5:54 pm to ZereauxSum
Yeah that was the reason I snapped and was a total dick in my reply.
Nice and dumb, I can deal with.
Dick and dumb, you get blasted
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News