- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Woodward gives his opinion on how Compliance should work...
Posted on 5/2/19 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 5/2/19 at 10:22 pm
Starting around 10 min mark. Excuse Kaare Johnson’s stupidity. We Ridin
LINK
quote:
I have a philosophy. We’re here to follow the rules but as a compliance dept I want the first attempt to be “Yes”.
quote:
Any lawyer can tell you something is against the law or regulations. A good lawyer can tell you how to get to yes.
quote:
We’re in a service business. We’re not here just to say no or take the easy way.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/2/19 at 11:31 pm
18
Posted on 5/2/19 at 10:24 pm to covtgr
Let the players smoke weed!
Posted on 5/2/19 at 10:32 pm to covtgr
That’s Alleva reincarnated right there. frick
Posted on 5/2/19 at 10:53 pm to ScaryClown
quote:
That’s Alleva reincarnated right there. frick
Obvious troll.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 10:54 pm to covtgr
Perhaps some cliffs 
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:07 pm to covtgr
If that doesn’t get you fired up as an LSU alum or fan, then you are a fricking retard. This dude is next level. We in good hands. Let’s ride 
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:10 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
Perhaps some cliffs
He feels that if a coach goes to compliance with something they should work towards getting them an answer of yes. If they can't give an answer of yes then they should be able to give the reasons why.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:33 pm to Hot Carl
Notes added. Woodward isn’t interested in your typical compliance horse shite.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:35 pm to covtgr
quote:
We’re in a service business. We’re not here just to say no or take the easy way.
fricking FINALLY.
Our AD gets it. Do what's best for the school and programs FIRST.
How far would the Tigers have gotten in the tourney if SW had been hired before the season?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:36 pm to covtgr
this is absolutely fantastic 
Posted on 5/3/19 at 6:19 am to covtgr
Damn right. The compliance Dept should work WITH the coaches not against them
Posted on 5/3/19 at 6:32 am to covtgr
I just got morning wood.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 6:33 am to covtgr
He's absolutely right. This is what any sort of compliance department should be doing. Saying No is easy for them. They don't risk anything that way. Too often they are allowed to take the easy way out. Leaders who are too disengaged, cowardly and/or incompetent (Alleva) allow them to get away with it. But it doesn't help the organization as a whole to just shut things down all the time.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 6:38 am to covtgr
This guy gets it
Posted on 5/3/19 at 6:39 am to covtgr
they are drastically over the top, if the NCAA/ SEC does not require it why are being so extra
Posted on 5/3/19 at 6:51 am to ScaryClown
quote:
ScaryClown
Why do you go somewhere else and go bother some other people?
Posted on 5/3/19 at 6:53 am to Shiftyplus1
quote:
How far would the Tigers have gotten in the tourney if SW had been hired before the season?
As far as they did without Woodward.
Look, I'm excited as hell to have Scott Woodward. I'm glad Alleva is gone, I want FKA out yesterday, and I want the compliance people out last week. But LSU wasn't getting past Michigan State with Phil Jackson on the bench.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 7:04 am to covtgr
It may seem like a small change in perspective but it's actually a huge deal. Most corporate lawyers save themselves work, time and reputational risk by being conservative and saying no to any internal proposals that even slightly impact the status quo.
What you really need, and Woodward seems to get this, is a lawyer that is willing to take risks and do the work/research to define what's allowable. It takes more effort and a lawyer fully committed to the success of the larger organization. It is not a lawyer/administrator who's primary concern is CYA.
What you really need, and Woodward seems to get this, is a lawyer that is willing to take risks and do the work/research to define what's allowable. It takes more effort and a lawyer fully committed to the success of the larger organization. It is not a lawyer/administrator who's primary concern is CYA.
This post was edited on 5/3/19 at 7:06 am
Posted on 5/3/19 at 7:14 am to TigerWoodlands
I do not believe that is a small change in perspective. I only base my opinion on several years of history reviewing the actions of our compliance department. It needs a serious overhaul, and it looks like the job is in progress.
Posted on 5/3/19 at 7:23 am to ScaryClown
quote:
That’s Alleva reincarnated right there. frick
You're out of your mind, Alleva's position is never yes, it might be no but hurry up and suspend just in case its maybe
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News