Started By
Message

re: Why is it a problem to hold Scott Woodward accountable?

Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:03 pm to
Posted by TigerCub
Team Boxtard
Member since May 2006
22248 posts
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Seems like the people defending SW are more upset with Landry’s involvement, not because they think SW is great. Probably stems from a R vs D mindset. Political affiliation dictates everyone’s outlook on every decision nowadays


Or maybe they’re worried about who they might end up picking as Woodward’s replacement.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
44890 posts
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:27 pm to
Some of yall have short memories of the angry elves we’ve had in the past.
Posted by bayoubilly57
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
566 posts
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:29 pm to
HE WILL BE FIRED
Posted by Safety Blitz
The Backfield
Member since May 2022
3447 posts
Posted on 10/29/25 at 7:53 am to
He built it. It’s there now…Kelly had everything he needed.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
29661 posts
Posted on 10/29/25 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

These comments are almost too dumb to engage, but I can't resist. LSU revenue is up over the last 6 years, contrary to popular belief. The athletic department does not fund the buyouts. Nothing about BK affected your precious revenue. I didn't like BK. Didn't like his contract, but the fixation on the buzzword "revenue" is getting old.

what else doesn’t spend more money than it generates?
How much profit did the AD make last season? For years, athletics donated 10M back to the university.

I know who pays it. People like me. Those that actually pay more than just TAF fees.

I d
This post was edited on 10/29/25 at 8:06 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram