Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Why is a blocked FG attempt that is advanced not considered a turnover?

Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:33 pm
Posted by DaddyGriff
Vidrine, LA
Member since Nov 2003
604 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:33 pm
Just wondering. Stats show that each team had two turnovers, the two interceptions. Why wouldn't the blocked FG attempt that we advanced be considered a turnover?
Posted by 985TigerSaint
Member since Mar 2009
1672 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:34 pm to
Thats a good question.
Posted by Kim Jong Ir
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2008
54066 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:35 pm to
Because the kicking team was going to lose possession after the kick anyway. Same reason a blocked punt is not a turnover.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38261 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:35 pm to
I would think its basically like a turnover on downs that just happens in the middle of the play.
Posted by charlottetiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Nov 2007
7965 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:36 pm to
valid point. possession was changed, hence the definition of the word turnover.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:36 pm to
Failed 4th down conversions aren't turnovers, so neither are failed FG attempts.
Posted by Myshkin
Wanderlust
Member since Jul 2011
2868 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:37 pm to
Hmmm. Using this logic, fumbles and ints on 4th down arent turnovers.
Posted by Kim Jong Ir
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2008
54066 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

valid point. possession was changed, hence the definition of the word turnover.



Possession was going to change anyway. Not a valid point.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Why wouldn't the blocked FG attempt that we advanced be considered a turnover?


because the kicking team did not have the possibility of a subsequent play...
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:40 pm to
You can't assume a failed 4th down conversion attempt, so those are still turnovers.
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21827 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

Failed 4th down conversions aren't turnovers, so neither are failed FG attempts.


Exactly. And neither are punts returned for TDs or large punt returns that bring the ball back to beyond the original LOS. In essence, a blocked FG becomes a punt once it crosses the LOS.
Posted by vjp819
South Sec. 414 / Alex Box Sec. 210
Member since Nov 2003
10882 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:43 pm to
Stands to reason that if your field goal attempt comes on a 3rd down and is blocked, the opponent recovers, that would be considered a turnover.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
5547 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

Hmmm. Using this logic, fumbles and ints on 4th down arent turnovers.
They are because the chance of getting a first and continuing the drive is still possible, on a fg that chance isn't there.
Posted by cleetus
Houston
Member since Nov 2010
4073 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:51 pm to
Good question. Got me curious too and this seems to be the line if thinking if most.

quote:

this is a kick from scrimmage -- the same rule as a punt. When it's blocked, it's live, and can be advanced. If the kicking team gets its kick blocked, miraculously recovers it, and still fails to advance it sufficient yards, then it's a turnover on downs.


Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Stands to reason that if your field goal attempt comes on a 3rd down and is blocked, the opponent recovers, that would be considered a turnover.


I think that once you attempt the kick, it doesn't matter who recovers behind the line of scrimmage. The defending team still gets the ball.

If you botch the snap and hold on 3rd down (before attempting the actual kick), you can still try again on 4th down.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 9:54 pm
Posted by Myshkin
Wanderlust
Member since Jul 2011
2868 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 9:55 pm to
But what if it is 4th and goal and you throw an INT or fumble?

You either score or turn the ball over. Same situation as the field goal.

Or there is a penalty and you get a first down, but that is still the same aas the field goal.

So it is inconsistent regardless.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 9:56 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram