- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: whats the deal with Stevan Ridley's injury?
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:10 pm to csand12
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:10 pm to csand12
quote:
has the rant forgotten miles' love affair with older players?
No, but they're all the same age, except for murphy. He can't play the age card this year, I don't think. Maybe it'll come down to months and days instead of class.
1
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:13 pm to csand12
quote:
No, but they're all the same age, except for murphy.
murphy, scott, and keiland all came in the same year. they're all the same age in terms of years at LSU
why would ridley get any PT over 3 older players?
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:13 pm to csand12
And how do you know that he wouldn't? Slowflowpro is right...as evidenced by recent history, Miles plays his older backs over younger ones this isn't to say that Ridley is any less talented than any of the other guys.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:18 pm to NatchezTiger17
quote:
murphy, scott, and keiland all came in the same year. they're all the same age in terms of years at LSU
Except for the fact that Ridley is two years younger than Scott and Keiland. Murphy is a year younger than scott an Keiland as well. Your argument in Ridley's favor doesn't have basis here.
This post was edited on 3/16/09 at 11:19 pm
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:19 pm to csand12
quote:
Except for the fact that Ridley is two years younger than Scott and Keiland. Murphey is a year younger than scott an Keiland as well.
scott, keiland, and murphy all came to LSU in the same class. that's a fact, brotha
quote:
Your argument in Ridley's favor doesn't have basis here.
who has been at LSU longer? Ridley or any of these 3 backs: Murphy, Scott, or Keiland?
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Are you sure? I think you should check your information because I checked and LSUsports says Murphy is a Jr and Keiland and Scott are Seniors while Ridley is a sophomore
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:21 pm to csand12
Didn't we hear that Murphy was to be converted as a receiver this year.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:22 pm to csand12
How doesn't the argument favor Ridley? We are merely arguing that Ridley is buried in the depth chart behind older backs that have seniority which Miles tends to favor over his younger ones. 
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:23 pm to JohnLSU
quote:
Didn't we hear that Murphy was to be converted as a receiver this year.
I hadn't heard that yet. Where'd you hear that?
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:24 pm to NatchezTiger17
Weren't you saying Ridley was the older back? and you've completely changed your argument now since Slo has come in.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:25 pm to csand12
quote:
Are you sure? I think you should check your information because I checked and LSUsports says Murphy is a Jr and Keiland and Scott are Seniors while Ridley is a sophomore
have you ever heard of a redshirt?
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:25 pm to csand12
No, moron. I know Ridley personally. Why in the hell would I say that? I was saying that Miles favors older backs and Ridley is the youngest of all of them. Go back and read the thread. Nice try, my friend.
This post was edited on 3/16/09 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
I didn't think he was reshirted. Ok I looked again, my bad.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:29 pm to csand12
quote:
No, moron. I know Ridley personally. Why in the hell would I say that? I was saying that Miles favors older backs and Ridley is the youngest of all of them. Go back and read the thread. Nice try, my friend.
Look no need to get mad. Go back and read your own posts. You never said anything about age until Slo came in.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:31 pm to csand12
I never said he was older only that I felt strong about his chances this year as getting some quality PT. I then agreed with SFP's assessment that Miles has in the past given the nod to the older backs despite the fact that a younger RB could be more talented.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:33 pm to NatchezTiger17
quote:
I never said he was older only that I felt strong about his chances this year as getting some quality PT. I then agreed with SFP's assessment that Miles has in the past given the nod to the older backs despite the fact that a younger RB could be more talented.
Ok alright. I'm not being antagonistic but I'm just curious why you think he is more talented? It's just a question, not an attack on him or his character so please don't take it that way.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:37 pm to csand12
quote:
I hadn't heard that yet. Where'd you hear that?
I can't remember, But I read about it somewhere.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:38 pm to JohnLSU
quote:
I can't remember, But I read about it somewhere.
Oh ok, just curious. I'd heard plenty about Russell Sheppard being put at receiver, as everybody has, but not Murphy yet. That's why I asked.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:53 pm to csand12
quote:
Based on what?
7.7 YPC
Now bring the excuse "It was only against.. & Their defense was Worn down in the 4th quarter and..and"
This post was edited on 3/16/09 at 11:55 pm
Posted on 3/16/09 at 11:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
has the rant forgotten miles' love affair with older players?
Patrick Peterson & Richard Dickson among others, have proven this to be bullshite. Your arguments are very stale & boring.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News