- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the deal with Montgomery?
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
its one thing to say he may not be high rated before the combine
but to say with a great combine that it wont vault his status up into the top half of the first round is kind of crazy.
if he is 250 and runs a great 40, 3-4 teams are going to drool about the possibility of putting him on the outside. He'd even have a strong appeal to 4-3 team as a DE.
but to say with a great combine that it wont vault his status up into the top half of the first round is kind of crazy.
if he is 250 and runs a great 40, 3-4 teams are going to drool about the possibility of putting him on the outside. He'd even have a strong appeal to 4-3 team as a DE.
0
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:05 pm to NastyTiger
quote:
Other will project higher.
based on what?
quote:
With more PT and game film on him he certainly could slip into the #1 spot next year.
1 year of domination wasn't enough?
and being the #1 DE is somewhat irrelevant. 9 DEs went in the first round last year. 10 if you count von miller (who is essentially a DE)
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
Like I said, bump this come draft day.
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:08 pm to NastyTiger
Lets say he measures 6'3" 250, and runs a 4.55
where do you think he goes?
where do you think he goes?
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:09 pm to NastyTiger
nobody is guaranteeing he's the #1 DE
you laughed at him going in the top half of the 1st
essentially SIX DEs (i'm going to change the term to pass rushers/DEs) went in the first 16 picks last year
miller
dareus
smith
watt
quinn
kerrigan
you laughed at him going in the top half of the 1st
essentially SIX DEs (i'm going to change the term to pass rushers/DEs) went in the first 16 picks last year
miller
dareus
smith
watt
quinn
kerrigan
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:40 pm to Brew Drees
As much as I love Sam we are very deep at end. We can make it without him as Rasco and Maclin have a similar frame/athleticism. Brockers on the other hand Im worried about. Most of our d tackles seem to have the smaller penetrating build not the mountain block eating DT type that brockers is.
I trust Brick (most underrated guy on our staff) but if we lose both of those guys we might have some trouble on the d line
I trust Brick (most underrated guy on our staff) but if we lose both of those guys we might have some trouble on the d line
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:44 pm to Adam Banks
i think brockers has the build of a 1-gap DT. he's only 300 lbs at 6-5. that's as big as tyson jackson
Posted on 12/24/11 at 4:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
he will have an incredible combine. I watched the Arkansas game earlier today and didnt see it at first but the 66 yard play Hamilton broke down the sideline Sonic Sam was almost matching him stride for stride and Hamilton is a speedster. I watched that play five times in a row i couldnt believe how fast Sam was, and thats off that freak injury last year.
Posted on 12/24/11 at 5:06 pm to ItTakesAThief
quote:
Posted by ItTakesAThief quote: I know he is already hands down a beast..Im just saying they could get him even BETTER The guy has already had one collegiate injury he has come back from. If he is healthy at the end of the year and a 1st or mid 2nd round pick he would be pretty smart to make the jump. No reason to risk a second injury.
Well said
Posted on 12/24/11 at 5:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
essentially SIX DEs (i'm going to change the term to pass rushers/DEs) went in the first 16 picks last year
Means absolutely nothing. Last year was loaded with DE, opposite this year.
Posted on 12/24/11 at 5:11 pm to Tigerfan56
i don't see a huge difference other than no von miller
it's a value thing. DEs are finally being seen as being more valuable, so more are getting drafted earlier
just like why ingram fell to the late 1st round. RBs are not valuable
it's a value thing. DEs are finally being seen as being more valuable, so more are getting drafted earlier
just like why ingram fell to the late 1st round. RBs are not valuable
This post was edited on 12/24/11 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 12/24/11 at 5:23 pm to Brew Drees
quote:
Why didn't he start vs. Georgia & Arkansas?
Was this question answered?
Posted on 12/24/11 at 5:31 pm to glassman
Brockers would be a bigger blow IMO
Posted on 12/24/11 at 6:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
1 year of domination wasn't enough?
He dominated last year before he got hurt also. Our D really wasn't the same after because Nevis was the only other guy that could pressure the QB.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News