- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:11 pm to Korkstand
It's the triple option of defense. It's effective because teams may gameplan for it once all year.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:14 pm to Korkstand
quote:
I thought so. All that says to me is they don't have guys with size that are also athletic,
We have a 6'5", 225 pound safety, that can cover, AND bring the wood.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:16 pm to ChineseBanditSlayer
JJ will easily figure that Defense out, and just pick them apart. 
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:16 pm to ChineseBanditSlayer
frick, we have a CORNERBACK over 200 lbs. that's the size of some WR's.
PP is nothing but a faster better version of your "safety"....now THAT'S scary.
PP is nothing but a faster better version of your "safety"....now THAT'S scary.
This post was edited on 9/22/10 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:18 pm to ChineseBanditSlayer
quote:
LSU has a 6'3", 220 pound corner, that can cover, AND bring the wood.
FIFY
ETA: And returns punts.
This post was edited on 9/22/10 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:21 pm to Suntiger
quote:
I don't remember seeing it that many times
Crowton hates play action passes because they're extremely effective.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:26 pm to ChineseBanditSlayer
quote:
We have a 6'5", 225 pound safety, that can cover, AND bring the wood.
I don't see anybody on the roster matching that description. What's his name? Anyway, I just don't see this scheme being effective against LSU for more than a quarter.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:36 pm to Korkstand
I do think it will call some cofusion in the passing game.
But we're winning games right now without throwing the ball.
But we're winning games right now without throwing the ball.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:36 pm to Korkstand
Robert Sands
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:41 pm to boonecountyman
quote:
Robert Sands
I see him now, Rivals has him 6-0, 211, but everybody else has him at 6-5. Weird.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:43 pm to boonecountyman
"JJ will easily figure that Defense out, and just pick them apart."
I hope this is sarcasm
I hope this is sarcasm
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:46 pm to boonecountyman
quote:
"JJ will easily figure that Defense out, and just pick them apart."
I hope this is sarcasm
Yep, thats what the little green man, with the eyes rolling upwards, means.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 4:51 pm to Mike Linebacker
quote:
I do think it will call some cofusion in the passing game.
Luckily that's only a dozen plays a game.
I know it can cause some confusion, and it will probably be effective against the screens that we like to throw so damn much. However, I think pounding up the middle will be extremely effective.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 5:05 pm to Korkstand
quote:
I don't see anybody on the roster matching that description. What's his name? Anyway, I just don't see this scheme being effective against LSU for more than a quarter.
Robert Sands.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 5:13 pm to ChineseBanditSlayer
Yeah, that other guy told me and I said:
Anyway, do they have 4 or 5 of him? Only then will I be worried.
quote:
I see him now, Rivals has him 6-0, 211, but everybody else has him at 6-5. Weird.
Anyway, do they have 4 or 5 of him? Only then will I be worried.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 5:17 pm to ChineseBanditSlayer
Look's like the mountaineers have found tepper's drop linebacker--------LOL
Posted on 9/22/10 at 5:18 pm to HARRY3740
quote:
3-3-5 is not as bad against the run as you may think.
this. 3-4; 4-4 etc. people assume that you have a 3 man DL all the time. not true. you still have a minimum of 3, but with the backers you have 6 to commit to the run and can commit 2 others easily. it leaves the D in a position to cover the pass as well. also, they will be preparing for LSU this week; i will guarantee they will load up the box a lot with guys that are designed to stuff the run. there is no magic; we have to pass to open up the run and vice versa.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 5:23 pm to DrTyger
A 3-3-5 defense is NOT a good defense against our offense. We cannot pass worth a damn, and we love to try to establish the run at no end. So, if can run the ball on the teams we have played so far, we definitely will be able to on the smaller 3-3-5 of WVU.
I don't think this will reduce our ability to pass much at all. It will still suck.
I don't think this will reduce our ability to pass much at all. It will still suck.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 5:31 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
3-4; 4-4 etc. people assume that you have a 3 man DL all the time. not true. you still have a minimum of 3, but with the backers you have 6 to commit to the run and can commit 2 others easily. it leaves the D in a position to cover the pass as well. also, they will be preparing for LSU this week; i will guarantee they will load up the box a lot with guys that are designed to stuff the run.
I get that, and I would expect it to be effective against teams that you have an athletic advantage over. LSU is not one of those teams.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News