- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We will win 22-25 basketball games next year in the regular season...
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:27 pm to WDE24
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:27 pm to WDE24
LSU coulda/shoulda/woulda had that record this season!
Finished 18 - 14
Losses that come to mind that should be a W:
South Alabama
Coastal Carolina
Virgina (ranked at time)
Ms St (ranked at time)
TN
Be at 23 - 9 right now and in the NCAA Tourney.
Here's to hoping it does actually happen next year!
Finished 18 - 14
Losses that come to mind that should be a W:
South Alabama
Coastal Carolina
Virgina (ranked at time)
Ms St (ranked at time)
TN
Be at 23 - 9 right now and in the NCAA Tourney.
Here's to hoping it does actually happen next year!
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:28 pm to TopWaterTiger
quote:Almost every .500 or slightly better team can play this game though. Including Auburn who wasn't very good this year.
LSU coulda/shoulda/woulda had that record this season!
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:30 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:I do, but I also understand the game of basketball, the positions/role those two play for Bama and how they are currently (especially early) deferring to talented upper class-men.
So why does Hickey have better numbers than Lacy? What about Hamilton? You do realize his numbers are far better than the players you're bringing up right?
quote:No need to be a douche, I was just discussing the topic of the thread and responding top a post.
ETA: run back to the SECr
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:31 pm to WDE24
quote:
Almost every .500 or slightly better team can play this game though. Including Auburn who wasn't very good this year.
He's right about the early season games when our entire team was made up of new faces for the most part.
And again, despite his effort today, the players you named on Alabama's team aren't necessarily better than players on LSU's. You can qualify it all you want and say that you were talking about "talent" but that's just bullshite. JOB has more upside than any of the players listed but who knows if he'll realize it.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:33 pm to Tiger Authority
so you guys hang with Kentucky...and all of a sudden your going to win 25 games next year....jesus christ...
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:33 pm to WDE24
quote:
I do, but I also understand the game of basketball, the positions/role those two play for Bama and how they are currently (especially early) deferring to talented upper class-men.
This is a total non-answer. I can't argue with anyone that wants to hold onto the thought that a player is more talented, despite what the numbers say. I can't prove to you that JOB has more upside than anyone, even if I believe it to be true. Doesn't make it right. All we have right now is the numbers indicating Hamilton is more productive than anyone you named.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:34 pm to thatdude1985
quote:
so you guys hang with Kentucky...and all of a sudden your going to win 25 games next year....jesus christ...
I guess one poster saying it should apply to the entire fanbase. Good to know Updyke, teabagger, cheater.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:36 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:I was talking about talent. That is what I said. I have no dog in this fight. I would be happy for Alabama to suck at everything. However, they are likely to be better than AU, MSU, OM and LSU next year. Anything can happen, especially in basketball where one player can make a huge difference, but those two freshmen for Alabama are very talented.
You can qualify it all you want and say that you were talking about "talent" but that's just bullshite.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:38 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:This is just dumb. Numbers matter, but they aren't the only thing that matters. I watch basketball, so I can offer opinions on which players are more talented than others.
All we have right now is the numbers indicating Hamilton is more productive than anyone you named.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:39 pm to WDE24
quote:
I was talking about talent
I know. And I was saying I can't argue against something this subjective. I think JOB has more talent than everyone we've discussed. But it really doesn't mean anything if he doesn't prove it on the court.
quote:
I would be happy for Alabama to suck at everything. However, they are likely to be better than AU, MSU, OM and LSU next year. Anything can happen, especially in basketball where one player can make a huge difference, but those two freshmen for Alabama are very talented.
I don't think the difference between LSU and Alabama is sizeable at all. Alabama making the tourney this year will put them above us next year, but I don't see a big difference next year without them having Green.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:40 pm to WDE24
quote:
This is just dumb. Numbers matter, but they aren't the only thing that matters. I watch basketball, so I can offer opinions on which players are more talented than others.
Of course you can. I can offer the same opinions because I watch basketball too. I think JOB is the most talented, and I guess I don't need to prove it with anything but saying that I've watched basketball. So there.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:41 pm to Tiger Authority
And we have a difference of opinion. Not a big deal. I'm simply superior at evaluating college basketball talent. 
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:43 pm to WDE24
quote:
And we have a difference of opinion. Not a big deal. I'm simply superior at evaluating college basketball talent.
No, you just provided us with why the SECr can be so intolerable at times. Because you don't actually have to prove anything to make an opinion unfounded by any factual proof. All you need is the ability to watch a sport and that is enough.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:44 pm to WDE24
quote:
Trevor Lacy and Levi Randolph
Randolph is pretty good. Lacy is one of the worst 5-stars I've seen. I wouldn't trade Hickey for either one of them.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:45 pm to Bubba Hotep
quote:
Randolph is pretty good. Lacy is one of the worst 5-stars I've seen. I wouldn't trade Hickey for either one of them.
Hickey's better production doesn't matter because he watches basketball.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:52 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:It's not like Hickey's numbers are significantly better than Lacey's. Given that he gets significantly more minutes with less senior talent on his team, they should be somewhat better.
Hickey's better production doesn't matter because he watches basketball.
This post was edited on 3/9/12 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:52 pm to tuptiger
quote:
We will win 22-25 basketbal
Well then I say we are making the final four
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:54 pm to WDE24
quote:
It's not like Hickey's numbers are significantly better.
Hickey doesn't pass the eye-ball test for you? He wasn't a heralded recruit? He's undersized? Has an ackward stroke? Well, all these things still made him more productive, and one of the real bright spots on this year's LSU team. And he was a true freshman.
Like I said, I can't argue with you about who you "feel" is more talented, because you can't be wrong. And one day, you may even be proven right. But all we have right now is production, and he produced.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:56 pm to WDE24
quote:
Given that he gets significantly more minutes with less senior talent on his team, they should be somewhat better.
Alternatively, with less senior talent, he has less talented players, making him less effective because he can't rely on others as much. Works both ways.
Posted on 3/9/12 at 4:56 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:I like Hickey, I just think Lacy and Randolph are more talented.
Hickey doesn't pass the eye-ball test for you?
Popular
Back to top


1




