re: We running it Back with Matt Mcmahon

Its Jimmy's and Joe's and Xs and Os. McMahon has flatly refused to do any fundraising efforts and when you combine that with being a poor X and O coach it's a disaster. He should have been fired the first time he told Fat Scott that fundraising wasn't part of his job but Fat boy was too lazy to do it!

quote:

---

Ok so you’ve inverted what the argument actually was. Guys like PK and the rest of your lot kept telling us in year 2 when he was redshirted that Chest was the missing link, the rebounder we were missing on that 9-9 team. The next season he started off playing well, getting up to 8.7 rebounds per game when he was getting regular minutes. Those same posters were saying it was part of McMahon’s plan and that Chest was an NBA player then when he and McMahon fell out and his minutes went to nothing the same posters claimed he was shite. This is where you jumped in and started calling him trash. After the season when you were claiming Tugler was an AA I pointed out that Chest had better numbers in almost every category which is when you started spurging out and trying to lie about what actually took place on this topic. Now that we’ve got that straight we can talk about underachieving players and players who’ve performed much better without McMahon than with which includes just about all of them.

---

none of this happened and unless you have quotes I don't care.

do you think chest should played more under beard?

quote:

---

we are all poo

---

Sorry for your loss

Im not sure the greatest agent in history could get Mcloser a job even at a mid -major!

Basketball has very few big donors.....just the way it is....a much harder road.

Mcmahon's system may be okay on offense but the defense and rebounding this year were abysmal. Here is a list of what he lacked.

1. Defensive schemes which could be adjusted both for different teams and also in game adjustments. How many times did we work hard for a score only to give up an open shot or easy layup on the other end?
2. I don't suppose it can be taught so we will chalk up to bad talent evaluation that our players universally had bad hands on rebounds and catching passes.
3. His rotations and timeouts were weird and inefficient.
4. He recruited talent that would work at the small college level but not in the SEC. Sutton was a perfect example. MVP of the Summit League. Can you even name a school in this league. Overpowered on defense and intimidated on short shots.
So his eye for talent was bad. They had flashes but little consistency. I will give the team credit for never quitting and playing hard but with the injuries and McMahon refusing to play anyone but six or seven players for the most part, they were tired by the end of games.