- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We need to bring back Doug Mallory and Bradley Dale Peveto
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:32 pm to LSUNO
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:32 pm to LSUNO
quote:
You're saying you're not totally sold on Chavis, and maybe we should let Malveto gameplan and coach some. Not for an entire game, but maybe just a half to see what they have?
Just to see what they've learned in the offseason. We're just curious.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:33 pm to saintsfan22
That's not my point at all. I'm completely serious. Like last year, do you remember when we gave up 52 points at home against georgia, now i know it might seem like we did better this year just because we only gave up 13, but that's just what actually happened in real life. obviously, if we had kept the co coordinators around we would have had a shut out this year, this is indisputable. 
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:34 pm to longwayfromLA
quote:
obviously, if we had kept the co coordinators around we would have had a shut out this year, this is indisputable.
Because Malveto wouldve had all spring and summer to improve?
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:36 pm to biglego
I wouldn't mind seeing them comes back as say co-DCs of Florida or Bama.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:38 pm to TIsuGGER
No, he did a great job of satirizing your viewpoint.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:39 pm to biglego
I agree completely. Who knows when Chavis is going to get hurt. He will inevitable, without a doubt get injured like Charlie Weis did last year, so we've got to make sure we have Malveto ready to go if, and when, Chavis gets hurt. It would be foolish not to get them more experience. Yes they sucked last year, but it wasn't their fault, and they owned up to sucking, which means they are now 100% awesome and last year means nothing.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:40 pm to TIsuGGER
quote:
Huge fail on trying to make a Lee comparison
Tell me where is our current D ranked? When it ranking is at 100 (like our offense), then you have a point. Until then, you just look rantarded.
i agree with you. now last year we did give up more "touchdowns" and "points" but look at this year, we have way less tackles as a team. tackles show heart. we need to go back to the Cos
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:41 pm to NaturalBeam
quote:
Who knows when Chavis is going to get hurt. He will inevitable, without a doubt get injured like Charlie Weis did last year,
Malveto had so much heart! Never skipped out on a press conference! Always happy to acknowledge suckage!
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:41 pm to longwayfromLA
quote:
longwayfromLA
Stay a longwayfromLA PLEASE
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:41 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
No, he did a great job of satirizing your viewpoint.
No he didnt. He made himself, and now you look like an idiot. Trading Malveto for Chavis gave us the #15 D in the nation.
Trading JLee for JJ gave us the 100th ranked offense. Anyone seeing a comparison is that has a stupid sign draped around their neck.
Oops, I see yours now. Sorry I responded.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:42 pm to RobbBobb
I knew Robbbob would be on this one!
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:43 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Anyone seeing a comparison in that has a stupid sign draped around their neck.
Oops, I see yours now. Sorry I responded.
I dont think this thread is going as well as the OP had hoped
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:45 pm to TIsuGGER
Considering the majority find it amusing, and only you, RobBobbforJLsPole, and SG get defensive, I would say it went exactly how the OP intended
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:46 pm to TIsuGGER
quote:
I dont think this thread is going as well as the OP had hoped
It probably sounded much better in his head. Now he'll always be known as the guy who wanted Malveto back.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:47 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
No he didnt. He made himself, and now you look like an idiot. Trading Malveto for Chavis gave us the #15 D in the nation.
Trading JLee for JJ gave us the 100th ranked offense. Anyone seeing a comparison is that has a stupid sign draped around their neck.
Oops, I see yours now. Sorry I responded.
all this talk about satire, i'm just saying i really wish we can go back to the good ole days of the Cos. Do you remember that one time, they blitzed real hard, yeah that was awesome. i think they got robbed. when les hired them, i'm sure they took that to mean that they would have the job for life. Just because they were really bad at coaching, they got fired. what's up with that? shouldn't they get to keep sucking, over and over and over indefinately?
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:48 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
It probably sounded much better in his head. Now he'll always be known as the guy who wanted Malveto back.
And whats amazing are the tards that think its a valid point. Their posts need to be always linked as also wanting Maslveto back, when they are debating other points.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:50 pm to longwayfromLA
quote:Really...it's not that funny dude.
longwayfromLA
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:50 pm to TIsuGGER
quote:
And whats amazing are the tards that think its a valid point. Their posts need to be always linked as also wanting Maslveto back, when they are debating other points.
Do you seriously not understand that nobody wants Malveto back, but it mocks the JL-cockgobblers like you instead? You really don't get that?
Posted on 11/2/09 at 2:50 pm to longwayfromLA
quote:
what's up with that? shouldn't they get to keep sucking, over and over and over indefinately?
No way. They should get to prove to us how much better they got during the summer when they didnt have to worry about all those meaningless "games" which do nothing but get in the way of real coaching development and in no way reflect the effectiveness of the coach.
Popular
Back to top


1






