- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:35 pm to LeagueCityTiger
That's ridiculous. Even if you made the bobble argument...he can and still could make a play.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:35 pm to supadave3
quote:
....He dropped his shoulder and took his arse out
Sholl did lol!

Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:36 pm to LeagueCityTiger
quote:
No, but I know the rules of baseball and that was NOT intereference. I am glad we won, but I am just pointing out that we got a break on the call. Watch the replay and slow it down and you will see what I am talking about.
Ok, still. It'd be 1st & 3rd with 2 outs and the next guy up grounded out. We still win coach. Oh, and it makes up for the blown call at first. We're even.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:36 pm to LeagueCityTiger
quote:
Posted by LeagueCityTiger
Watching the replay, Jacoby had already misplayed the ball and then the collision occured. This is not intereference. The baserunner did not impede the fielder's ability to make a play. I would bet my bottom dollar that is what Serrano was arguing about.
ITS OK, IM A LIMO DRIVER.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:37 pm to Tigerdew
quote:The next guy doubled, but it still would have been 7-6 Tigers with a runner on 2nd and 2 outs.
the next guy up grounded out.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:37 pm to LeagueCityTiger
Ok dude, I did watch the replay.
In fact here it is. LINK
Now YOU watch it. Jones is still able to make a play even after he bobbled it but the runner interferes.
In fact here it is. LINK
Now YOU watch it. Jones is still able to make a play even after he bobbled it but the runner interferes.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:38 pm to WHATDOINO
nola never tagged the runner but he definitely had the opportunity had the ump not ruled the runner out.....you call it what you want but i say its just baseball
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:38 pm to lsutigermall
quote:
That's ridiculous. Even if you made the bobble argument...he can and still could make a play.
Wrong again. Once the fielder is given right to field a ball cleanly (which he had) and boots it then there is no longer interference. God you people seriously don't know the rules of baseball.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:38 pm to Xenophon
quote:
Nola picked up the ball and tagged the runner on the ground, so he was still out..
Not in the video he didn't unless he did that after the dude got up.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:41 pm to LeagueCityTiger
quote:
Wrong again. Once the fielder is given right to field a ball cleanly (which he had) and boots it then there is no longer interference. God you people seriously don't know the rules of baseball.
What would have been the correct call, in your opinion? No interference called, two players lying motionless in the infield. What next?
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:41 pm to LASPORTSBABE
Why are we even arguing? Enjoy the win.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:42 pm to LeagueCityTiger
Did you stay at a holiday inn express last night?
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:42 pm to LASPORTSBABE
Now YOU watch it. Jones is still able to make a play even after he bobbled it but the runner
NO, NO, NO, NO...HE KICKED THE DAMN BALL. The intereference ceases at that point!!! Ask any umpire. The field umpire didn't see the kick or he wouldn't have called it. I swear that is the rule. Look it up.
quote:
interferes.
NO, NO, NO, NO...HE KICKED THE DAMN BALL. The intereference ceases at that point!!! Ask any umpire. The field umpire didn't see the kick or he wouldn't have called it. I swear that is the rule. Look it up.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:45 pm to LeagueCityTiger
quote:
What would have been the correct call, in your opinion? No interference called, two players lying motionless in the infield. What next?
Baseball invalids....Have you ever watched a homeplate collision when both guys are knocked senseless and the pitcher picks up the ball and tags the baserunner???? There you go.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:45 pm to xXLSUXx
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/30/23 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:46 pm to LeagueCityTiger
even if it did go under his glove, 9 times out of 10 the ump would rule interference on that. it was bang/bang in real time
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:46 pm to LeagueCityTiger
quote:jump
LeagueCityTiger
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:46 pm to LeagueCityTiger
He clearly bobbled the ball before the collision as it looks like he misplayed it, but it is very likely that he saw the runner in his periphial. I think the ump had to default to interference on this one, since it was bang bang.
Posted on 3/11/11 at 10:46 pm to LeagueCityTiger
quote:
Rule 7.08(b) Comment: A runner who is adjudged to have hindered a fielder who is attempting to make a play on a batted ball is out whether it was intentional or not.
If, however, the runner has contact with a legally occupied base when he hinders the fielder, he shall not be called out unless, in the umpire’s judgment, such hindrance, whether it occurs on fair or foul territory, is intentional. If the umpire declares the hindrance intentional, the following penalty shall apply: With less than two out, the umpire shall declare both the runner and batter out. With two out, the umpire shall declare the batter out.
Popular
Back to top
