- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USC AD: decision to move LSU game to come in the next 24 - 36 hours
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:05 am to BayouBengals03
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:05 am to BayouBengals03
quote:
lol Clemson isn't a conference game, so that's irrelevant.
It is on par with a SEC road game when Clemson is good.
4
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:05 am to GetCocky11
quote:
And if you don't switch, South Carolina gets 5 away games in 2020.
Conference games, jackass
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:05 am to GetCocky11
quote:
@ Clemson
Not SEC, thats on yall.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:05 am to skullhawk
quote:
That changes to guaranteed loss if you bring it to TS.
Have you seen them play? It's a guaranteed loss anywhere, including Columbia.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:05 am to GetCocky11
quote:
It is on par with a SEC road game when Clemson is good.
Irrelevant.
4 conference home games, 4 conference away games. That's all this is about.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:05 am to GetCocky11
quote:
And if you don't switch, South Carolina gets 5 away games in 2020
But USCe had that anyway.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:06 am to tigamike
quote:
the next 24 - 36 hours by tigamike
Not a dick move at all. If we host this game I'm sure all proceeds over expense will be given to USC for relief efforts
Actually from what was said on radio thus am. The money would all go to SC as this would still be considered their home game.
I would guess after expenses of course but gate would go to them
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:06 am to skullhawk
quote:
jackass
Nice.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:06 am to GetCocky11
quote:
It is on par with a SEC road game when Clemson is good.
That's on yall for playing them. It has no bearing on the SEC schedule.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:06 am to MorbidTheClown
You aren't very smart
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:07 am to MorbidTheClown
quote:
yeah , frick y'all. we know you're flooding and people are dying and shite is all fricked up. But, frick y'all if you think you can lose YOUR home game and we gain one and then help you out the next time...
Serious question, are you retarded?
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:07 am to GetCocky11
quote:
And if you don't switch, South Carolina gets 5 away games in 2020.
@ Fla, @ Vandy, @ Kentucky, @ LSU, @ Clemson
That is a schedule that you guys made. That is on you.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:07 am to TigerDat
quote:
The money would all go to SC as this would still be considered their home game.
yeah, no. The gate would but no way concessions would.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:07 am to OneMoreTime
quote:
You aren't very smart
same can be said about 99% of the people in this thread.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:07 am to ell_13
The safety of the people (of Columbia, first responders, players, coaches and fans) should be the FIRST priority. If there is no running water and there is no electricity and the police/first responders are stretched thin, that should be the answer right there. Take money completely out of the equation and the answer is simple. People are the number one priority.
I am a life-long LSU fan/alum - living on the East Coast. We bought tickets for the game. Of course, we were looking forward to driving down to Columbia and enjoying our weekend there- just like everyone else who has or bought tickets. It isn't about the money, it is about the people and the safety. If it isn't safe, it should NOT be there. Period. If the tables were turned (and it has been) I would say the same. Safety first. Yes, they should try to move to to a neutral site in the vicinity of SC. I agree. However, if they can not, they need to say where it will be so that everyone can plan. I am sure that there is a contingent of USC fans who wouldn't mind doing the drive to BR. I am sure they would appreciate being able to return to some resemblance of "normalcy", albeit, for a few mere days. Above all, this is about the game and the people. If they continue on with the plan to play in Columbia- I would find it to be selfish just to play it there. It isn't safe and it isn't the right thing to do. Praying for the people of SC! Keep your chins up!
I am a life-long LSU fan/alum - living on the East Coast. We bought tickets for the game. Of course, we were looking forward to driving down to Columbia and enjoying our weekend there- just like everyone else who has or bought tickets. It isn't about the money, it is about the people and the safety. If it isn't safe, it should NOT be there. Period. If the tables were turned (and it has been) I would say the same. Safety first. Yes, they should try to move to to a neutral site in the vicinity of SC. I agree. However, if they can not, they need to say where it will be so that everyone can plan. I am sure that there is a contingent of USC fans who wouldn't mind doing the drive to BR. I am sure they would appreciate being able to return to some resemblance of "normalcy", albeit, for a few mere days. Above all, this is about the game and the people. If they continue on with the plan to play in Columbia- I would find it to be selfish just to play it there. It isn't safe and it isn't the right thing to do. Praying for the people of SC! Keep your chins up!
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:07 am to GetCocky11
Nobody cares about your nerdy OOC schedule.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:08 am to LMfan
It doesn't make sense for both fan bases to have to travel to the game on short notice.
Really don't see any neutral site as a viable option.
Really don't see any neutral site as a viable option.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:08 am to More beer please
quote:
yeah, no. The gate would but no way concessions would.
You don't think LSU would donate at least some of the concession profits to SC?
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:08 am to BilJ
quote:
the neutral site at some of the places named makes no sense. The attendance will be beyond poor and USC will stand to lose even more money. Columbia or BR should be the only options.
that is my feeling as well. if it comes down to money, which all college athletics essentially do, then Baton Rouge makes the most sense. the stadium can be filled, a majority of the profit can go towards relief efforts or USC. if it comes down to the integrity of the competition, then play at an empty WB in SC.
Neutral sites, on this short of notice will lose money.
Posted on 10/7/15 at 9:08 am to LNCHBOX
Yall think tanner had the balls to call up the mayor, state police chief, and actually ask them if they had any deputies/troopers to spare for saturday? Seems like a dick move IMO
Page 58 of 75
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News