- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Two Golden Eras of LSU Football: 1958-1973 & 1995-2010
Posted on 1/15/11 at 8:33 am to Doc Fenton
Posted on 1/15/11 at 8:33 am to Doc Fenton
1969, the year of grand theft Notre Dame. F the Irish and NBC.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 8:36 am to CITWTT
quote:
1969, the year of grand theft Notre Dame. F the Irish and NBC.
Has there every been a one loss team from a big conference that was left out of the bowls?
Little queenie decides she now wants to play in the bowls, and the cotton falls all over themselves.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 8:36 am to CITWTT
quote:
1969, the year of grand theft Notre Dame. F the Irish and NBC.
thank you, we could have had another NC when we had beaten Texas ......
This post was edited on 1/16/11 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 1/15/11 at 8:37 am to EricB
quote:
No one can give LSU credit for 1958 decade of LSU football when they wouldn't even allow blacks to play in the SEC. As I recall, thats around the same time Bear Bryant had his arse handed to him by USC... those titles had absolutely nothing to do with who is the best team and everything to do with southern racial politics. Southern would have kicked LSU's arse back then, just look at who was sending more players to the NFL. LoL what a joke
thanks Eric. Now could you explain to us how Billy Cannon paid off the Heisman voters. This has always bothered me and FINALLY, FINALLY, FINALLY your expert knowledge on this era is enlighting. What would the rant be without people like you.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 8:39 am to MsGulfCoastTigerFan
quote:
What would the rant be without people like you.
A better place?
Posted on 1/15/11 at 8:43 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
A better place?
nailed it!!!!
Posted on 1/15/11 at 9:40 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
Has there every been a one loss team from a big conference that was left out of the bowls?
We weren't left out; we chose not to go to a lesser bowl.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 9:45 am to Indiana Tiger
Posted on 1/15/11 at 9:48 am to Doc Fenton
How 'bout a third Golden Era of LSU football: 1933 - 1946
Alabama 98-21-7 (80.56%)
Tennessee 103-24-5 (79.92%)
Georgia 100-41-6 (70.07%)
LSU 92-38-10 (69.29%)
That's a better winning percentage than the 1995-2010 period.
Alabama 98-21-7 (80.56%)
Tennessee 103-24-5 (79.92%)
Georgia 100-41-6 (70.07%)
LSU 92-38-10 (69.29%)
That's a better winning percentage than the 1995-2010 period.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 9:56 am to nedped
quote:The reason why tiger fans bitch about no "respect" is because most of the sports anchors and talking heads can only back to their recollected memories which probably goes back to their high school days in the mid to late seventies or later. That's why teams like Miami and FSU are considered national powers with tradition. When LSU was good, teams like Miami and FSU didn't even exist in the national spotlight.
If so, everyone needs to stop playing the r-e-s-p-e-c-t card,
Posted on 1/15/11 at 10:08 am to La Place Mike
I don't think I have a problem with including 95-99 in this current era. Those years started our current bowl dominance. Prior to the DiNardo era, we absolutely sucked in bowls from 74-88. And of course we went six years after without sniffing a bowl game from 89-94. We've doubled our bowl win total since the 1995 season.
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:32 pm to blueridgeTiger
quote:
How 'bout a third Golden Era of LSU football: 1933 - 1946
That's a difficult era to judge for several reasons: (1) because the CFB world was still very regionalized back then, and it was more difficult to matchup the best teams against each other, resulting in a lot of inflated W-L records; (2) because it's hard to fit the pre-1936 era into the mix because the AP poll didn't yet exist; (3) because the bowl system was still in its infancy, and national titles were disorganized at best; & (4) because the disruption of WWII throws an additional monkey wrench into trying to judge things.
That being the case, I think I can argue that the era from 1931 to 1946 represents the classical era of LSU football. It fits the 16-year standard that I created after the very sharply defined era from 1958-1973, and is sandwiched between seasons in 1930 & 1947 & 1948 in which LSU had losing conference records.
Really, this is the era where LSU football as we know it was created. Tiger Stadium was built in 1924. The LSU campus transitioned to its current location from 1925 to 1932. Huey P. Long was inaugurated as governor of Louisiana in May 1928. LSU played its first night game in Tiger Stadium in 1931. LSU played its first season in the SEC in the fall of 1933. LSU played its first non-Cuban bowl game against TCU in the Sugar Bowl of January 1, 1936. Etc., etc., etc.
I would like to call this the "Classical Era" of LSU football, when LSU produced top notch NFL draft picks like Abe Mickal, Gus Tinsley, Ken Kavanaugh Sr., Young Bussey, Steve Van Buren, Alvin Dark, Red Knight, and Y.A. Tittle.
Let 'er rip...
Posted on 1/15/11 at 11:33 pm to Doc Fenton
THE CLASSICAL ERA
[Season, Record (SEC Record), Final AP Ranking]
1931, 5-4 [3-2 in SoCo], N/A ( 1931; #49)
1932, 6-3-1 [4-0 in SoCo], N/A ( 1932; #21)
1933, 7-0-3 (3-0-2), N/A ( 1933; #5)
1934, 7-2-2 (4-2), N/A ( 1934; #6)
1935, 9-2 (5-0), N/A ( 1935; #4)
1936, 9-1-1 (6-0), 2
1937, 9-2 (5-1), 8
1938, 6-4 (2-4), NR
1939, 4-5 (1-5), NR
1940, 6-4 (3-3), NR
1941, 4-4-2 (2-2-2), NR
1942, 7-3 (3-2), NR
1943, 6-3 (2-2), NR
1944, 2-5-1 (2-3-1), NR
1945, 7-2 (5-2), 15
1946, 9-1-1 (5-1), 8
TOTAL, 103-45-11 (48-27-5 in SEC; 7-2 in SoCo)
XXX
SoCo Standings for 13 Future SEC Teams in 1931
Tulane, 8-0
Tennessee, 6-0-1
Alabama, 7-1
Georgia, 6-1
Kentucky, 4-2-2
LSU, 3-2
Auburn, 3-3
Sewanee, 3-3
Vanderbilt, 3-4
Florida, 2-4-2
Georgia Tech, 2-4-1
Ole Miss, 1-5
Miss. State, 0-5
SoCo Standings for 13 Future SEC Teams in 1932
LSU, 4-0
Tennessee, 7-0-1
Auburn, 6-0-1
Alabama, 5-2
Vanderbilt, 4-1-2
Tulane, 5-2-1
Georgia Tech, 4-4-1
Kentucky, 4-5
Ole Miss, 2-3
Georgia, 2-4-2
Florida, 1-6
Miss. State, 0-4
Sewanee, 0-6
SEC Regular Season Records, 1933-1946
(Team, Record, Winning Pct., Conference Titles)
1. Tennessee, 57-13-3, .8014, 4
2. Alabama, 59-16-6, .7654, 4
3. LSU, 48-27-5, .6313, 2
4. Georgia, 38-29-5, .5625, 2
5. Tulane, 37-32-5, .5338, 2
6. Georgia Tech, 39-35-5, .5253, 3
7. Miss. State, 34-32-3, .5145, 1
8. Vanderbilt, 32-39-4, .4533, 0
9. Auburn, 31-39-7, .4481, 0
10. Ole Miss, 23-36-4, .3968, 0
11. Florida, 16-45-4, .2769, 0
12. Kentucky, 13-47-3, .2302, 0
13. Sewanee, 0-37, .0000, 0
TOTAL, 427-427-0
NOTE: JHowell’s site does not include Vanderbilt win at Sewanee in 1940 as a legitimate conference game.
NOTE2: Auburn, Georgia, & LSU never played Sewanee in a conference game. Sewanee’s 37 SEC opponents included: Vanderbilt (8); Tulane (7); Florida (5); Ole Miss (4); Miss. State (4); Tennessee (3); Alabama (3); Georgia Tech (2); & Kentucky (1).
XXX
National Leaders Ranked Subjectively, 1931-1946
(Team, Record, Top 20 Seasons, Top 10 Seasons, Nat’l Titles Officially Claimed)
1. Minnesota, 94-35-6, 6, 5, 5 (1934; 1935; 1936; 1940; 1941)
2. Notre Dame, 110-29-10, 10, 9, 2 (1943; 1946)
3. Tennessee, 121-24-7, 9, 5, 2 (1938; 1940)
4. Army, 108-36-8, 4, 3, 3 (1944; 1945; 1946)
5. Southern California, 103-48-15, 4, 3, 3 (1931; 1932; 1939)
6. Alabama, 115-24-7, 6, 4, 2 (1934; 1941)
7. Michigan, 94-39-5, 9, 7, 2 (1932; 1933)
8. Pittsburgh, 91-50-8, 3, 3, 4 (1931; 1934; 1936; 1937)
9. Ohio State, 94-34-7, 6, 2, 1 (1942)
10. TCU 108-55-10, 3, 1, 2 (1935; 1938)
11. LSU, 103-45-11, 4, 3, 0
12. Duke, 114-35-4, 8, 4, 0
13. Georgia, 110-48-8, 4, 2, 2 (1942; 1946)
14. California, 91-68-7, 2, 1, 1 (1937)
15. Fordham, 72-25-10, 6, 2, 0
16. Tulane, 91-54-7, 2, 1, 0
17. Duquesne (of Pittsburgh), 71-22-2, 3, 2, 0
18. Texas A&M, 96-57-11, 3, 3, 1 (1939)
19. SMU, 90-70-12, 0, 0, 1 (1935)
20. Santa Clara, 75-32-9, 5, 2, 0
21. Texas, 94-56-7, 5, 2, 0
22. Boston College, 97-37-8, 2, 2, 0
23. Holy Cross (of Worcester) 104-36-13, 3, 1, 0
24. Mississippi State, 90-51-5, 3, 1, 0
25. North Carolina, 89-51-3, 2, 1, 0
26. Stanford, 76-41-11, 2, 1, 0
27. Nebraska, 84-55-6, 3, 2, 0
28. UCLA, 84-66-11, 3, 2, 0
29. Rice, 91-73-6, 2, 1, 0
30. Tulsa, 104-40-10, 4, 1, 0
HONORABLE MENTIONS: Cornell; Dartmouth; Georgia Tech; Hardin-Simmons (of Abilene); Missouri; Northwestern; Oklahoma; Penn; Princeton; & Villanova.
XXX
1931-1946 --> 68.2% overall; 64.6% in conf.; 6 Top 10 finishes; 0 NC
1958-1973 --> 76.3% overall; 71.4% in conf.; 10 Top 10 finishes; 1 NC
1995-2010 --> 71.4% overall; 62.9% in conf.; 6 Top 10 finishes; 2 NC
[Season, Record (SEC Record), Final AP Ranking]
1931, 5-4 [3-2 in SoCo], N/A ( 1931; #49)
1932, 6-3-1 [4-0 in SoCo], N/A ( 1932; #21)
1933, 7-0-3 (3-0-2), N/A ( 1933; #5)
1934, 7-2-2 (4-2), N/A ( 1934; #6)
1935, 9-2 (5-0), N/A ( 1935; #4)
1936, 9-1-1 (6-0), 2
1937, 9-2 (5-1), 8
1938, 6-4 (2-4), NR
1939, 4-5 (1-5), NR
1940, 6-4 (3-3), NR
1941, 4-4-2 (2-2-2), NR
1942, 7-3 (3-2), NR
1943, 6-3 (2-2), NR
1944, 2-5-1 (2-3-1), NR
1945, 7-2 (5-2), 15
1946, 9-1-1 (5-1), 8
TOTAL, 103-45-11 (48-27-5 in SEC; 7-2 in SoCo)
XXX
SoCo Standings for 13 Future SEC Teams in 1931
Tulane, 8-0
Tennessee, 6-0-1
Alabama, 7-1
Georgia, 6-1
Kentucky, 4-2-2
LSU, 3-2
Auburn, 3-3
Sewanee, 3-3
Vanderbilt, 3-4
Florida, 2-4-2
Georgia Tech, 2-4-1
Ole Miss, 1-5
Miss. State, 0-5
SoCo Standings for 13 Future SEC Teams in 1932
LSU, 4-0
Tennessee, 7-0-1
Auburn, 6-0-1
Alabama, 5-2
Vanderbilt, 4-1-2
Tulane, 5-2-1
Georgia Tech, 4-4-1
Kentucky, 4-5
Ole Miss, 2-3
Georgia, 2-4-2
Florida, 1-6
Miss. State, 0-4
Sewanee, 0-6
SEC Regular Season Records, 1933-1946
(Team, Record, Winning Pct., Conference Titles)
1. Tennessee, 57-13-3, .8014, 4
2. Alabama, 59-16-6, .7654, 4
3. LSU, 48-27-5, .6313, 2
4. Georgia, 38-29-5, .5625, 2
5. Tulane, 37-32-5, .5338, 2
6. Georgia Tech, 39-35-5, .5253, 3
7. Miss. State, 34-32-3, .5145, 1
8. Vanderbilt, 32-39-4, .4533, 0
9. Auburn, 31-39-7, .4481, 0
10. Ole Miss, 23-36-4, .3968, 0
11. Florida, 16-45-4, .2769, 0
12. Kentucky, 13-47-3, .2302, 0
13. Sewanee, 0-37, .0000, 0
TOTAL, 427-427-0
NOTE: JHowell’s site does not include Vanderbilt win at Sewanee in 1940 as a legitimate conference game.
NOTE2: Auburn, Georgia, & LSU never played Sewanee in a conference game. Sewanee’s 37 SEC opponents included: Vanderbilt (8); Tulane (7); Florida (5); Ole Miss (4); Miss. State (4); Tennessee (3); Alabama (3); Georgia Tech (2); & Kentucky (1).
XXX
National Leaders Ranked Subjectively, 1931-1946
(Team, Record, Top 20 Seasons, Top 10 Seasons, Nat’l Titles Officially Claimed)
1. Minnesota, 94-35-6, 6, 5, 5 (1934; 1935; 1936; 1940; 1941)
2. Notre Dame, 110-29-10, 10, 9, 2 (1943; 1946)
3. Tennessee, 121-24-7, 9, 5, 2 (1938; 1940)
4. Army, 108-36-8, 4, 3, 3 (1944; 1945; 1946)
5. Southern California, 103-48-15, 4, 3, 3 (1931; 1932; 1939)
6. Alabama, 115-24-7, 6, 4, 2 (1934; 1941)
7. Michigan, 94-39-5, 9, 7, 2 (1932; 1933)
8. Pittsburgh, 91-50-8, 3, 3, 4 (1931; 1934; 1936; 1937)
9. Ohio State, 94-34-7, 6, 2, 1 (1942)
10. TCU 108-55-10, 3, 1, 2 (1935; 1938)
11. LSU, 103-45-11, 4, 3, 0
12. Duke, 114-35-4, 8, 4, 0
13. Georgia, 110-48-8, 4, 2, 2 (1942; 1946)
14. California, 91-68-7, 2, 1, 1 (1937)
15. Fordham, 72-25-10, 6, 2, 0
16. Tulane, 91-54-7, 2, 1, 0
17. Duquesne (of Pittsburgh), 71-22-2, 3, 2, 0
18. Texas A&M, 96-57-11, 3, 3, 1 (1939)
19. SMU, 90-70-12, 0, 0, 1 (1935)
20. Santa Clara, 75-32-9, 5, 2, 0
21. Texas, 94-56-7, 5, 2, 0
22. Boston College, 97-37-8, 2, 2, 0
23. Holy Cross (of Worcester) 104-36-13, 3, 1, 0
24. Mississippi State, 90-51-5, 3, 1, 0
25. North Carolina, 89-51-3, 2, 1, 0
26. Stanford, 76-41-11, 2, 1, 0
27. Nebraska, 84-55-6, 3, 2, 0
28. UCLA, 84-66-11, 3, 2, 0
29. Rice, 91-73-6, 2, 1, 0
30. Tulsa, 104-40-10, 4, 1, 0
HONORABLE MENTIONS: Cornell; Dartmouth; Georgia Tech; Hardin-Simmons (of Abilene); Missouri; Northwestern; Oklahoma; Penn; Princeton; & Villanova.
XXX
1931-1946 --> 68.2% overall; 64.6% in conf.; 6 Top 10 finishes; 0 NC
1958-1973 --> 76.3% overall; 71.4% in conf.; 10 Top 10 finishes; 1 NC
1995-2010 --> 71.4% overall; 62.9% in conf.; 6 Top 10 finishes; 2 NC
This post was edited on 1/15/11 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 1/16/11 at 12:53 am to Tigerpaul1969
You have to keep 95-99 out because not much was accomplished. You had two solid seasons, '96 (10-2) and '97 (9-3), but you had two really bad years, '98 (4-7) and '99 (3-8).
Out of these five seasons, you had no National Championships, no SEC Championships, not even an SEC West Championship. If we would have won an SEC title during this stretch, I could justify throwing these years into the mix, even with the combined 7-15 in the last two years.
So if we didn't accomplish anything, why compromise 2000-2010, when we did win 2 national titles, 4 SEC West Titles, and 3 SEC Championships? 1995-99 wasn't terrible, but these years did not enjoy any real accomplishment. We won three bowl games, sure, but no titles.
You don't need 16 seasons to qualify as an era, so let's focus on the 11 consecutive quality seasons we did accrue. And the many more that have yet to come...
Out of these five seasons, you had no National Championships, no SEC Championships, not even an SEC West Championship. If we would have won an SEC title during this stretch, I could justify throwing these years into the mix, even with the combined 7-15 in the last two years.
So if we didn't accomplish anything, why compromise 2000-2010, when we did win 2 national titles, 4 SEC West Titles, and 3 SEC Championships? 1995-99 wasn't terrible, but these years did not enjoy any real accomplishment. We won three bowl games, sure, but no titles.
You don't need 16 seasons to qualify as an era, so let's focus on the 11 consecutive quality seasons we did accrue. And the many more that have yet to come...
Posted on 1/16/11 at 1:42 am to Doc Fenton
Doc I would have a large problem with putting 1931-46 together:
1st 1931 Coach Russell T. "Russ" Cohen last season.
1932-34 Coach Lawrence M. "Biff" Jones
1935-46 Coach Bernie H. Moore his final season is 1947.
Coach Russell T. "Russ" Cohen 1928-1931
Coach Lawrence M. "Biff" Jones 1932-34
Coach Bernie H. Moore 1935-47
2nd There is two losing seasons in the span 1939 and 1944. With 1941 a break even year between the losing seasons.
3rd Biff Jones is the first major recruiter at LSU since Wingard and his years added to the recruits Sr. year is a span of 1932-36 covering a span of one of the greatest in LSU history.
4th The Y.A. Tittle years are 1944-47 and that last season is left out of the span.
5th Coach Cohen span is broken into 2 parts vs his real span of 4 season, with a record of 23-13-1.
6th The Bowl game split, the 3 Sugar Bowl of 34-35-36 are based mainly on the Jones recruits, with a WWII being the major factor of the 44 Orange and 47 Cotton Bowl teams.
Just a few notes, the 1939 team is the weakest of the pre war teams on the list, with the 1944 team being the weakest on the list. The 1941 team was very young a rebuilding year for LSU.
The 1947 team left off the list is the strongest or 2nd strongest of the span with 1934 team being loaded 3 deep in an Iron man era of football. 1947 is the hard luck LSU team.
1st 1931 Coach Russell T. "Russ" Cohen last season.
1932-34 Coach Lawrence M. "Biff" Jones
1935-46 Coach Bernie H. Moore his final season is 1947.
Coach Russell T. "Russ" Cohen 1928-1931
Coach Lawrence M. "Biff" Jones 1932-34
Coach Bernie H. Moore 1935-47
2nd There is two losing seasons in the span 1939 and 1944. With 1941 a break even year between the losing seasons.
3rd Biff Jones is the first major recruiter at LSU since Wingard and his years added to the recruits Sr. year is a span of 1932-36 covering a span of one of the greatest in LSU history.
4th The Y.A. Tittle years are 1944-47 and that last season is left out of the span.
5th Coach Cohen span is broken into 2 parts vs his real span of 4 season, with a record of 23-13-1.
6th The Bowl game split, the 3 Sugar Bowl of 34-35-36 are based mainly on the Jones recruits, with a WWII being the major factor of the 44 Orange and 47 Cotton Bowl teams.
Just a few notes, the 1939 team is the weakest of the pre war teams on the list, with the 1944 team being the weakest on the list. The 1941 team was very young a rebuilding year for LSU.
The 1947 team left off the list is the strongest or 2nd strongest of the span with 1934 team being loaded 3 deep in an Iron man era of football. 1947 is the hard luck LSU team.
This post was edited on 1/16/11 at 1:45 am
Posted on 1/16/11 at 5:18 am to TexanPete
I think a lot of people are totally missing the point of the comparison. The 16-season spans were constructed to answer a particular question related to whether or not the current stretch of good seasons has surpassed all past stretches throughout LSU history.
The main bearer of the standard here, without question, is the sharply defined era from 1958 to 1973. Everything else must be measured from that. So if you are going to answer the question, "Has what LSU done recently surpassed all past stretches of good years in terms of sustained success over a long time period?", then you must compare periods having the same length of time. Hence, the comparison of 1958-1973 with 1995-2010.
Moreover, there was very obviously a sharp break in LSU's degree of success on the field from pre-1995 to 1995-and-beyond, whereas it's not really clear as to whether the years 2000 to 2002 were all that different from the years 1995 to 1997. Whatever.
Obviously, you can't put the starting and ending points of an era in stone while the era is still in progress. Without a doubt, if LSU continues on its current trajectory through to 2016, we will likely be talking about 2001 to 2016 rather than 1995 to 2010. I'm just saying, if this current era is to surpass all others going before it, you must do a 16-year comparison so as to see whether it measures up to 1958-1973.
As for the 1931-1946 time frame, yeah, that was obviously kind of forcing things a bit to call it a cohesive era. There is a point to it, though, and that point was to show that no 16-season period before 1958-1973 could compare to it. I put together the best 16-year period that was conceivably possible, and it still didn't measure up. So there you have it. I'm just providing measuring sticks here, people.

The main bearer of the standard here, without question, is the sharply defined era from 1958 to 1973. Everything else must be measured from that. So if you are going to answer the question, "Has what LSU done recently surpassed all past stretches of good years in terms of sustained success over a long time period?", then you must compare periods having the same length of time. Hence, the comparison of 1958-1973 with 1995-2010.
Moreover, there was very obviously a sharp break in LSU's degree of success on the field from pre-1995 to 1995-and-beyond, whereas it's not really clear as to whether the years 2000 to 2002 were all that different from the years 1995 to 1997. Whatever.
Obviously, you can't put the starting and ending points of an era in stone while the era is still in progress. Without a doubt, if LSU continues on its current trajectory through to 2016, we will likely be talking about 2001 to 2016 rather than 1995 to 2010. I'm just saying, if this current era is to surpass all others going before it, you must do a 16-year comparison so as to see whether it measures up to 1958-1973.
As for the 1931-1946 time frame, yeah, that was obviously kind of forcing things a bit to call it a cohesive era. There is a point to it, though, and that point was to show that no 16-season period before 1958-1973 could compare to it. I put together the best 16-year period that was conceivably possible, and it still didn't measure up. So there you have it. I'm just providing measuring sticks here, people.
This post was edited on 1/16/11 at 5:24 am
Posted on 1/16/11 at 6:18 am to Doc Fenton
quote:
there was very obviously a sharp break in LSU's degree of success on the field from pre-1995 to 1995-and-beyond
1994.....4-7
1998.....4-7
Not very obviously. In fact, not even obviously.
Posted on 1/16/11 at 6:54 am to EricB
quote:
Two Golden Eras of LSU Football: 1958-1973 & 1995-2010
No one can give LSU credit for 1958 decade of LSU football when they wouldn't even allow blacks to play in the SEC. As I recall, thats around the same time Bear Bryant had his arse handed to him by USC... those titles had absolutely nothing to do with who is the best team and everything to do with southern racial politics. Southern would have kicked LSU's arse back then, just look at who was sending more players to the NFL. LoL what a joke
Your an uneducated dumbass...get Pete Finneys book...and read it..then do some more history on the black athlete in the SEC...
Posted on 1/16/11 at 2:53 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:
I can argue that the era from 1931 to 1946 represents the classical era of LSU football.
My dad was a student at LSU in the mid-1930s, and growing up I was fascinated with the tales he told of Tiger football from that period. Really interesting stuff as you point out - Huey Long's total involvement in Tiger athletics. Always fun to read of that period.
Posted on 1/16/11 at 3:38 pm to EricB
quote:
No one can give LSU credit for 1958 decade of LSU football when they wouldn't even allow blacks to play in the SEC. As I recall, thats around the same time Bear Bryant had his arse handed to him by USC... those titles had absolutely nothing to do with who is the best team and everything to do with southern racial politics. Southern would have kicked LSU's arse back then, just look at who was sending more players to the NFL. LoL what a joke
I'm going to hope that you're young and ignorant. If not, then you are some kind of stupid.
Popular
Back to top


2







