re: The rule that should have been put in place after OU in 2003

quote:

---

I agree. Even though the true #1 and #2 would turn out to be LSU-Bama, there should not be a re match.. they had there shot, at home.... and lost. no way do they deserve another shot.. Is a compliment to the SEC and our style of football if we would end up with rankings as such, but no.... Bama would have done nothing to deserve a re-match

---

The system calls for 1v2.

You think if Alabama is number 2, they don't deserve to play for the national championship?

That's dumb. I don't want to play bama, but you should take it up with the system if you don't like it.

What if every other school had two loses except bama? The two loss team should go before bama just because they "had their shot?"

The bcs isn't in place to ensure the "fairness" to a team that had already beat someone somewhere. It is set up to match 1v2

It sucks, but if bama is really the next best, we should play them