- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Most Logical Thing to Have Ever Been Typed on the Rant!!
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:24 am to LSU Red24
Posted on 11/18/09 at 8:24 am to LSU Red24
quote:
what do you want jefferson to do? the play calling fits our QBs style and im not sure why you complain. Stats dont lie. so yes, please look at stats. if we dont have a QB that can go deep a lot, then we're not going to go deep a lot. that makes perfect sense does it not? and jefferson has never had the opportunity to lead a 2 minutes drive so saying he cannot is pure speculation. with receivers like lafell and tolliver this year i dont see why he couldnt
I want him to change positions to TE where he belongs...The play calling doesnt fit his style it fits into the scared mentality of not wanting to throw the ball over the middle or deep for fear of pics (ala last year)...If you dont have a QB that can go Deep alot means you dont have a QB...you have an athlete that can throw a little bit...No it doesnt make sense, the play callings is meant to do one thing...Hide Jefferson...Well, if your hiding Jefferson your not focused on your real goal, scoring points... As for the two minute drill, Jefferson doesnt have a chance unless one of his recievers does it for him...
1
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:25 am to TigerFan55555
damn, im bored...
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:27 am to TigerFan55555
quote:
damn, im bored...
you misspelled "a flaming homosexual"
Posted on 11/18/09 at 9:48 am to Hot Carl
I have to admit i laughed when i saw this...
its funny how you can convince some idiot that you spew logic and have him post a thread about you and two others being rant of the year and then 20 or 30 others come on that board and laugh at you...Now thats funny...
arent you gay? like really?
its funny how you can convince some idiot that you spew logic and have him post a thread about you and two others being rant of the year and then 20 or 30 others come on that board and laugh at you...Now thats funny...
arent you gay? like really?
This post was edited on 11/18/09 at 9:50 am
Posted on 11/18/09 at 10:10 am to TigerFan55555
I don't think people are overlooking the impact of a new center and guard. What I think people are overlooking is the fact that the times we have been successful this year at running the football was when the starters at center and guard were replaced with backups.Examples are Tulane & La Tech(Lonergan)We have been unable to make 1/2 yard(Georgia) on third downs,thus, unable to sustain drives.Major problem not playing players that produce results.
Posted on 11/18/09 at 10:31 am to biglego
quote:
the "great" Danielson
This guy seems like he could/would make adjustments on the fly if he was any OC/DC. For the past few years I've listened/watched CBS broadcasts with GD and he's dead on. He recognizes bad formations, bad schemes, bad personel, and mismatches. I know he has the luxury of commenting on mis-haps after the fact, but many, many times he points out bad situations before the snap. I honestly believe his knowledge, personality, and overall resume would be enough to cancel out any coaching inexperience he has to take a risk at hiring him in any capacity on our staff. This guy would be a gem at either OC or DC if that would be his desire. Not sure of his salary, but if we could offer him better, I'd say do it.
Plan B....If Ricky Bustle is canned as ULL's HC this season, do we offer him our vacant OC position?
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:09 am to Choctaw
quote:
There is one BIIIIIIIIGGG issue missing....the QB situation the last couple of years. But ya'll keep covering your eyes and blame everything on the coaches....it's easier that way.
THIS
also
quote:
I nominate TireBiter for Poster of the Year!!! That fricker is sharp...
quote:
wish it were mine, cant remember the guys name i got it from, but he wrote out my thoughts better than i could!!
quote:
There he is!!!! TIRE Biter!!!,
damn , sit in his lap dude
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:19 am to LSU Red24
quote:
im still not sure how this qualifies for the most logical thing to have ever been typed on the rant.
we were down to essentially our fourth string QB last year (perrilloux, hatch, lee, jefferson). and coming into this year jefferson had 2 starts under his belt. 2. and yes i agree our offense is dismal but the defense has been solid with the exception of last year. and we made changes and look at us now. and think about the D next year. absolute studs. the offense will be much improved next year with 3 of the 5 olinemen staying, plus a returning QB, a great receiving core, and a lot of depth at RB. i cannot believe that one off year causes this much choas. this stuff happens to every good program. look at USC this year. Look at Oklahoma this year. Look at Ohio State this year. We're not alone. and honestly you can make a strong debate that LSU is the fourth best team in the country. Florida, Texas, Bama then who? Cinci? Boise? TCU? Considering that IMO we should have/could have beaten Bama we have a strong case for being the fourth best team in the nation. and people are still bitching. i dont get it
Agreed! Had Bama lost GMac,Ingram,and had their best def player play with cramps,I'm betting LSU wins that game.
Please tell me if you think Bama would have won.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:22 am to aglandry
quote:
don't think people are overlooking the impact of a new center and guard. What I think people are overlooking is the fact that the times we have been successful this year at running the football was when the starters at center and guard were replaced with backups.Examples are Tulane & La Tech(Lonergan)We have been unable to make 1/2 yard(Georgia) on third downs,thus, unable to sustain drives.Major problem not playing players that produce results.
Which SEC teams have weaker DLs than Tulane and Tech?
Another flute player who thinks she knows more than the coaches!
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:51 am to Bert Lyons 716
I haven't read all of this thread so someone may have mentioned this
We are 107th in the nation in total offense.
We have top-10 talent and don't give me this young QB struggles crap. I'm certain several of the 106 teams above us have new or inexperienced QBs as well. ITS POOR COACHING!!! especially at OC.
We are 107th in the nation in total offense.
We have top-10 talent and don't give me this young QB struggles crap. I'm certain several of the 106 teams above us have new or inexperienced QBs as well. ITS POOR COACHING!!! especially at OC.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 6:02 am to TigerFan55555
I don't want to agree but it sure looks good when you read it!
Posted on 11/19/09 at 6:24 am to 756
Florida has a dysfunctional offense, but controlled the ball vs LSU well. Not going to say they toyed with LSU, but the score isn't indicative of the way the two teams played. Ditto vs Alabama. LSU's problem is usually the second half. Has been all season long.
I support Coach Miles, basically because there are no potential replacements that I feel certain would do better at this time. I do have a feeling the Ole Miss and Arkansas games could spell doom for him if the team continues to look dysfunctional. Still he would not get shown the door, but would lose even those who refuse to see what is occurring. In the past two seasons, the only above average team LSU has beaten has been Georgia Tech.
Its pretty much the consensus that LSU has talent coming in as good as anyone. Elite talent on the college level. Go get em Coach Miles. Show the world that we are wrong down the homestretch. I hope you do.
I support Coach Miles, basically because there are no potential replacements that I feel certain would do better at this time. I do have a feeling the Ole Miss and Arkansas games could spell doom for him if the team continues to look dysfunctional. Still he would not get shown the door, but would lose even those who refuse to see what is occurring. In the past two seasons, the only above average team LSU has beaten has been Georgia Tech.
Its pretty much the consensus that LSU has talent coming in as good as anyone. Elite talent on the college level. Go get em Coach Miles. Show the world that we are wrong down the homestretch. I hope you do.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 9:47 am to 756
quote:
Had Bama lost GMac,Ingram,and had their best def player play with cramps,I'm betting LSU wins that game.
quit making excuses, fact is we were out coached on both sides of the ball...we were running a 50 look (instead of bringing pressure) injuries are apart of the games...Bama already had one of its best linebackers out and if your comparing Scott to Ingram your not very intellient...Hell there QB is better than ours as well...
Posted on 11/19/09 at 10:51 am to waldo2112
quote:
they scored enough to win....and put up a ton of yardage
Yes and no. Enough to win but 21 points under their average and the fewest in any game this season by 10 points. 2nd fewest yardage total on year,(4 more than UT) and 102 ypg less than average.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:06 am to TigerFan55555
quote:
quit making excuses, fact is we were out coached on both sides of the ball...we were running a 50 look (instead of bringing pressure) injuries are apart of the games...Bama already had one of its best linebackers out and if your comparing Scott to Ingram your not very intellient...Hell there QB is better than ours as well...
I think you're mistaking someone's take on factual lamentations as excuses. 'Bama won the game and they certainly played well enough to deserve the win. However only someone in strictest denial who observed the game could say they did not have the majority of game-changing breaks. Their on players acknowledged this in post-game, commenting on PP being out of the game on Julio's td play as well as their QB's admission that from his perspective the officials missed the INT call. "Sometimes you just get the breaks" per Mr. MCElroy. They also acknowledged that Scott was the toughest back to bring down they had faced all year. He will play in the NFL so it's ridiculous to downplay his talent. Ingram is a fantastic player and I would personally rate him slightly higher than Scott. But Scott was headed to well over a 100 yards that day if not for the injury, against a supposed juggernaut of a defense. As for the QB, JJ has more of an upside and will probably be the higher rated QB when there college days are over. BTW, the perspective of coaching decisions are always enhanced when given the benefit of game-changing breaks and calls that have nothing to do with scheme or play call.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 1:55 pm to RANDY44
quote:
think you're mistaking someone's take on factual lamentations as excuses.
No, they still sound like excuses to me, never said that we didnt the breaks, but theres a difference between being lucky and making your own luck (called being good)
quote:
commenting on PP being out of the game on Julio's td play as well as their QB's admission that from his perspective the officials missed the INT call.
Doesnt matter, (I know how it happened, but Championships are won by teams, if one player goes down someone has to step up) Did you see how their coaches saw that our best defender was out and who did they throw the ball too?!...When was the last time our coaches did that.? Were too busy worrying about our own problems because we have no confidence in what were doing...
quote:The guy dominated the game, we couldnt stop him and they knew it and they were smart enough to continue to run him, have we done that all year? NO!
Ingram is a fantastic player and I would personally rate him slightly higher than Scott.
quote:Pure speculation.
But Scott was headed to well over a 100 yards that day if not for the injury
quote:BIG TIME SPECULATION, I agreed his phyical attributes gives him an "upside" Tall, thick, good arm...Some would say the same about Ryan Leaf, Jamarcus Russell. Upside dont mean shite if you cant get the job done...I can tell you this right now, JJ will never be a Championship caliber qb...if you want to go 9-3 and hide behind a defense for that record be my guest, but JJ isnt gonna win the games he's not suppose too..(not attacking him, I'm sure he is a fine young man personally)
As for the QB, JJ has more of an upside and will probably be the higher rated QB when there college days are over.
quote:Signed, Les Miles, 2005-2007
the perspective of coaching decisions are always enhanced when given the benefit of game-changing breaks and calls that have nothing to do with scheme or play call.
"Luck dont last forever lawn-boy"
At some point, you just have to be good...Were not.
This post was edited on 11/19/09 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 11/19/09 at 1:57 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
Pure speculation
Anyone that watched that game could tell you that Scott was finally hitting his stride, as he does in most games. Wear them down in the first half, break the big runs in the second half. Your hatred of Miles and this team is blinding you.
quote:
Were not.
It takes a truly shitty team to be ranked in the top 10 nationally.
This post was edited on 11/19/09 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:19 pm to Rickety Cricket
quote:
Anyone that watched that game could tell you that Scott was finally hitting his stride, as he does in most games.
Actually I was quite surprised to see him run well. And thats not a good sign to be surprised when someone runs well.
quote:Kind of like your love of him? first off I dont hate him, but I dont like him either, dont think he is elite, nor would I fire him (for now)...
hatred of Miles and this team is blinding you
quote:You were the one that said we were a shitty team, I simply stated that I didnt think we were that good based upon our talent... The next two games will say alot...
It takes a truly shitty team to be ranked in the top 10 nationally.
And this year I believe the Top 10 is a Little over rated anyway, when you have the likes of TCU, Cinncy, Iowa, Boise ST, GA Tech all in the Top Ten, does that sound like a typical year? Sounds like to me there are a lot of teams that are young or building..
+ the bad part is, I believe Boise St and TCU would beat us...
This post was edited on 11/19/09 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:37 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
The next two games will say alot...
I'm sure you also said that the UGA and Auburn games would say a lot
Posted on 11/20/09 at 10:36 am to Rickety Cricket
quote:
I'm sure you also said that the UGA and Auburn games would say a lot
As I did with Florida and Bama..
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News