Victry4LSU

What if Clemson never would have brought up or mentioned anything about safety A.J. Haulcy's suspension prior to the game and A.J. actually started and played the first half. What ruling would come about, if Clemson, sports media, or anyone for that matter, broadcast on all media outlets that LSU just won a game with an ineligible or illegal player. Does the NCAA penalize LSU with a loss or a forfeit? LSU just recently had to vacate 37 wins from 2012-2015 because of an ineligible player. (LSU should fight to get those wins back, just for the same reasons Michigan recently was allowed to keep their wins and just pay a fine instead.)

Blame the saints all you want. Referees won the game for Carolina. Prove me wrong. Two defensive pass int. Counts for 1 team not the other. As expected, EVERY penalty in last 5 minutes went against one team. Obvious horse collar in the open just ignored. Easy holding calls not called on panthers. How does one team get every favorable call in last 5 minutes? Blatant cheating.

9-10

quote:

---

They played Oklahoma, Georgia 2x, Ole Miss, and Florida. That’s 5. If you go by game rank, you just swap Florida and Auburn.

---

I did confuse Florida and Auburn's ranking at respected times. I still stand by my argument if you may that one team played one hell of a lot of AP ranked teams than the other, 4 to 1 before the bowls or 5 to 2 after the bowls.

quote:

---

How am I exaggerating


By claiming they played 7 games against ranked opponents when they only played 5.

---

Playing ranked opponents at a 4 to 1 or 5 to 2 ratio is not exaggerating sos.

quote:

---

We agree they were wrong in that evaluation, but it wasn’t inconsistency or a conspiracy.

---

I remember hearing the Kansas City sports writer on ESPN claiming LSU was better but voting for USC. I still don't get where one team has NO argument, 11-1 vs 12-1 before bowl or 12-1 vs 13-1 after bowl, or SOS(BCS), SOS(polls), or worst loss, or common opponents, etc. The team that can't win any of these arguments was chosen over the team that wins everyone of these arguments.

quote:

---

The AP Poll

---

Team A) Final record 12-2 Played 5 AP ranked teams, 3-2 vs AP, 0 losses vs unranked, SOS #11 (BCS)
Team B) Final record 13-1 Played 6 AP ranked teams, 5-1 vs AP, 0 losses vs unranked, SOS #29
Team C) Final record 12-1 Played 2 AP ranked teams, 2-0 vs AP, 1 loss vs unranked, SOS #37

AP chooses Team C as their champion, The team that played less AP ranked teams, the team that beat less AP ranked teams, the team that lost to an unranked team, the team that played the easiest schedule of the 3 according to their poll and the BCS formula. Seems to me they disrespected and showed how worthless their AP poll was.

quote:

---

Oklahoma lost to K-State 35-7. USC was peaking in December and had a fluke loss to Cal in September. It was just a ridiculous outcome.

---

1) OU 12-1 had a better record than USC 11-1
2) OU's SOS was better than USC's.
3) OU's lost was to a RANNKED CONFERENCE CHAMPION. USC lost to an UNRANKED team.
What criteria would allow USC over OU?

quote:

---

This is such bull shite coping nonsense. USC was #1 in the AP going into the bowls and won, why would they drop?

---

Maybe if the AP voters RESPECTED their own poll, then they could of USED their poll and chose their champion based on the team that played 7 AP ranked teams and beat 6 AP ranked teams instead of giving it to a team that played 3 AP ranked teams and lost to a NON RANKED team. They SERIOUSLY IGNORED THEIR POLL

Mondo Duplantis

As someone mentioned earlier, we’re devolving instead of evolving. A great tradition taken away because of ridiculous claims. Yeah I’ll say it. Texas, Colorado, Florida St, Auburn, USC, Oklahoma, UGA, and everyone else can keep their traditions with their animals entertaining thousands of people, but LSU can’t. It was fine before. It’s still fine at other schools. If the concern is fireworks, get rid of the fireworks. If it’s noise from the crowd, put him in a soundproof enclosure. Problem is, people or groups that have no business speaking for how the majority thinks are having their way. You know these people. Statues are offensive. Male athletes can win 1st place in women’s events. Border protection are important for other countries, not ours. How bout this, I’m sure 99% of Americans were not offended with the pretty little Indian girl on “Land O Lakes” butter, but she’s no longer there because some how it was offensive. Kudos to Florida St for not caving in to name change. The Seminole Indians love it. Get this, [The Washington Commanders are being sued by The Native American Guardians Association, which has been trying to get the Commanders to change the name back to Redskins.
The lawsuit states:
“The logo on the Redskin’s helmet is an actual person, it’s Chief White Calf. Every time they go out on that field, they were honoring Chief White Calf and they were battling on the football field with the same honor and integrity and courage. They should continue to honor that.”]. My point again, people or groups making wrong decisions for the majority shouldn’t have their way. What’s right at Colorado should also be right at LSU. What’s right at FSU should also be right at Washington DC.

I just have the feeling if it was LSU in this scenario, the talking heads would make it a talking point of taking a playoff spot from FSU or LSU shouldn't be allowed to play with a possibility of vacating the 3 wins they were accused of spying on. If the investigation is no longer ongoing, then just ignore this post.