Started By
Message

re: The best way to change the SEC referee issues...

Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:56 am to
Posted by TG
Metairie
Member since Sep 2004
3061 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:56 am to
Having two of the most influential positions within the SEC held by BAMA alumni can be a factor in calls made. I'm not saying refs are being told what to call or who to call for or against. But the inference can't be overlooked. Decisions are made to please those who employ in all workplaces each and every day.
Posted by runningTiger
Member since Apr 2014
3029 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 10:57 am to
No one in the world is without bias

But we must do our best to lessen bias

Hiring head officials who graduated from bama or who have daughters attending bama is the opposite of trying to prevent bias

There is a conspiracy
It is not spoken but it occurs with a wink and a pat on the back
Posted by runningTiger
Member since Apr 2014
3029 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:00 am to
The fact
That the head of sec replay booth is a huge bama booster is a big problem

The fact that he was allowed anywhere near replay booth in 2009 LSU bama game was criminal

And we saw how that one call gave bama the win and allowed them to get to nc game
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:06 am to
quote:

No one in the world is without bias

But we must do our best to lessen bias


Agreed. even the most well meaning of us are subject to that reality. Whether it's believing our child is the prettiest or the smartest or most talented, to the fact that our idea is better than everyone else's, to having it effect our judgement when it comes to things which we're passionate about.

It's conformation bias, and in most cases we try and adjust for it.

In this case, we should be doing that by trying to take any and all potential bias out of the system. Instead, we seem to be pretending that in OUR case (the SEC that is) this very real phenomenon does not come into play.

Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
6772 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:07 am to
Geaux Tiger TM's points are not only rational, but essentially irrefutable. I fully agree with them and would like to expand on them. I think the biggest problem of Alabama grads being in influential positions within the SEC offices is best seen by the situation involving Mark Womack and scheduling the last few years.

As pointed out Womack is an Alabama grad (as well as a grad of Tuscaloosa High). He also, prior to becoming, essentially the number three guy in the SEC offices, worked in the Alabama Athletic Department. He was in charge of the committee that determined out of division conference scheduling, after Texas A&M and Missouri were added. After it was determined that teams would retain their permanent out of division opponent (certainly at the behest mostly of Alabama and Tennessee, and to a lesser degree Auburn and Georgia), each school had to be assigned one other out of division game. I've been unable to find exactly how this was done, other than knowing it was done by the committee headed up by Womack.

Long story short, Alabama (who was scheduled to play Georgia in a home and home rotation in 2012-2013) plays Missouri in 2012 and Kentucky in 2013. LSU was given South Carolina in 2012 and Georgia in 2013. No one, given the recent history of those teams and expectations placed on all those teams involved, could argue LSU was not given an unquestionably tougher road to navigate than Alabama. Now, there is no way of ever knowing if any "bias" toward his alma mater and former employer played any role in those decisions. But, to quote Geaux Tiger TM's earlier post "so long as there is this very open conflict of interest we, as other members of the conference, will ALWAYS have a reason to wonder if we're getting screwed."
This post was edited on 11/10/14 at 11:09 am
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45156 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:09 am to
The best way to not shite the bed is to not lose your cool and push another player after the whistle right in front of the ref or kick it out of bounds and set an offense who hasn't done shite all night in good field position

The Bama guy misses the game tying kick you guys aren't even whining about the refs. But we need something to point at since it didn't work out that way
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:16 am to
quote:

he Bama guy misses the game tying kick you guys aren't even whining about the refs. But we need something to point at since it didn't work out that way


because we were in it at that point and the game was in question once the fumble occurred. Then a judgement call came in. Can you admit that the PF was a judgement call?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39567 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:19 am to
You guys are just wrong on this. It's possible, and even likely given the SEC office is in Alabama, that Bama and Auburn get a little home cooking. But you guys are greatly exaggerating it.

In this recent game I hear a number of calls cited as evidence, but the calls were going both ways.

Interference against Chi on the last play? Go watch Jalen Collins mugging the Bama receiver on one of the sideline routes. I held my breath waiting for the flag. The truth is that when receivers start pushing off, the refs will let the DBs get away with a lot.

Personal foul on Vadal? Well, Bama got a critical personal foul in overtime. Also, Jamal Adams flopped twice in recent games to draw similar fouls.

We see the ones that go against us, but we gloss over the others. The refs didn't beat us guys; Bama did. In the closing minutes of the game Quinn dropped a critical pass, Jones dropped a critical pass, Vadal lost his composure, and our kicker botched a kickoff. Additionally, our defense quit. That's why we lost, not the referees.
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45156 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:19 am to
I think the ref called it because he pushed him after whistle, and throwing the flag on the guy who gets caught doing the shoving last is nothing new to football

Judgement call? Yes

A call to conspire against LSU and purposely help Alabama? No
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I think the ref called it because he pushed him after whistle, and throwing the flag on the guy who gets caught doing the shoving last is nothing new to football

Judgement call? Yes

A call to conspire against LSU and purposely help Alabama? No


that is always a call against both teams. Always offsetting.
So,what are you trying to say again?
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:24 am to
quote:

The best way to not shite the bed is to not lose your cool and push another player after the whistle right in front of the ref or kick it out of bounds and set an offense who hasn't done shite all night in good field position


For Christ sake, no one is suggesting otherwise. Regardless of how ridiculous BAMA acted there if none of LSU's players would have reacted at all, there would have been nothing to throw a flag at.

But can anyone honestly look at that play in particular and say what Vadal did was egregious enough to come down on him as doing something outrageously stupid? Before I saw the replay at home, I'll admit to being pissed at him for the call. I could not imagine a call like that being made with him throwing a god damn punch or something.

then I looked at it, and realized he did nothing that warranted the flag. If anyone in that entire play deserved a flag (and honestly no one did as far as I'm concerned) it would have been #90 Jarren Reed who pushed Pocic once in the face mask and then again, harder than anyone in the scrum, in the chest. Vadal simply pushed a guy off of him while he was yanking on his thoigh.

Has Alexander open hand punched a guy, or done something egregious I'd agree and would be begrudgingly saying so. That's just not what happened.

What should have happened was the refs stepping in, telling both team to settle the frick down, and get on to second down. At worst what we should have seen was offsetting penalties given the nature of the pushing and shoving that had taken place. I don't fault the official for throwing it on Vadal if that's all HE saw, but I do fault the rest of the crew for not setting it straight given someone else could have certainly seen the rest of the fracas.
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:27 am to
quote:

I don't fault the official for throwing it on Vadal if that's all HE saw, but I do fault the rest of the crew for not setting it straight given someone else could have certainly seen the rest of the fracas.


they won't listen to you. they're delusional and proud of their team and their cheat refs
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45156 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Always offsetting
Youve never seen a pushing match in a football game and the last guy getting caught (retaliating) being the last one to do to the shoving be the only one penalized?
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27667 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:29 am to
Look, we all know there is corruption in SEC football. WE know it has been going on for years and the proof is been demonstrated especially since the 2006 Auburn game. We know that having the SEC offices in Birmingham is problematic. Here is my solution as to how to beat the GUMPS:

Develop a competent offense where the receivers actually catch the balls thrown to them by a mediocre , at best, QB.

Star developing a QB that can both rn and throw and does not need to go with a "check with me" thing before every snap.

Inform the TE that he is a receiver and as such is expected to try to get open for passes and also catch said passes.

Teach DB' that when you have the lead and the other team has no time outs with less than a minute left, that tackling the receiver in bounds actually gives you a better shot at winning the game.

I know we are still smarting after this because it always seems that Bama can pull a win out of its arse perhaps with the help of the guys in stripes, but we let up late.

In two years with the players we have now at the skill positions LSU WILL be in a position to knock the living crap out of Bama. I just hope that if Miles gets an opportunity to humiliate the Gumps that he takes advantage of it.

Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45156 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:30 am to
I do believe Vadal's pushing was probably warranted. But like I said, the retaliator getting the flag is nothing new to football..it sucks, but it is what it is

Vadal should've known better and kept his cool
Posted by Swm323
Pace,FL
Member since Mar 2013
1360 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:35 am to
quote:

because overtime should have never happened. Alabama got free football because of the dirt Personal foul after the fumble. Judgement call right?


You are assuming a lot. You are assuming that LSU scores a TD. You are assuming that Alabama doesn't score a TD at the end of regulation. You are ignoring the kick out of bounds.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:38 am to
quote:

In this recent game I hear a number of calls cited as evidence, but the calls were going both ways.

They're not stupid. They'll make some calls/non calls against Bama to try and make it look somewhat fair, but they'll always give Bama the break whenever possible when it's down to the wire.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:40 am to
quote:

I do believe Vadal's pushing was probably warranted. But like I said, the retaliator getting the flag is nothing new to football..it sucks, but it is what it is


No doubt...but would agree that in most cases you'd never see that flag thrown for what amounted to s shove in the chest and not a punch thrown in that instance? We're told all the time that officials DO, in fact, take into account how much a particular foul affects the play before calling it. I quoted Tom Ritter himself last week talking about how holding is the hardest call to make because you could throw it on every play but don't and therefore have to DECIDE when a hold really effects a play.

So I really don;t fault the official who threw it for throwing it. Maybe form him angle he simply did not see anything but what looked like some egregious shove by Vadal. But not either waving it off or calling it offsetting given the entirety of the play after getting together for nearly a minute to discuss it with the rest of the crew is simply not acceptable and I'd argue unjustified.

Did it cost LSU the game? As with most things, we'll never know. What we do know is it cost LSU two legit shots at at least going for a TD on that series. No coach in the country, even Miles, tempts fate and plays for a TD after being moved back to the 21 there. 2nd and goal from the 6 gets you two more shots running down BAMA's throat...something LSU had done all night.

quote:

Vadal should've known better and kept his cool


I really would love to agree here, but I just don;t think what he did was bad enough to come down on him. We've had LSU played do exactly that in the past, and I've been pissed about it. I want to say Tyson Jackson did this at least once. Was Rasco the last do cost us doing this? I forget. Both in both of those cases what they did absolutely warranted the flag and it was clear they did something dumb and let their emotions get the better of them. Alexander did not even appear to being going after the guy or pushing him in anger. More like, "Get the frick off of me."

I see your point...I do. I just disagree.
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:41 am to
quote:

You are assuming a lot. You are assuming that LSU scores a TD.
from the 5 yard line which is where the play was stopped on the run o n1st down. Yes i do assume that LSU would have scored a touchdown. You are assuming not. Why? What are my odds vs. yours since you decided to make a post about it?

quote:

You are assuming that Alabama doesn't score a TD at the end of regulation.
they barely had enough time to kick the field goal.They had no more plays.That was it.

quote:

You are ignoring the kick out of bounds.
no i'm not. Even with the kick out of bounds bama still barely had enough time to get in fieldgoal range. What are you trying to say?
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45156 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 11:42 am to
Solid post
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram