- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Talking heads/ media
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:01 pm
Why is no one asking why the SEC is not suing Ole Miss for circumventing rules by using an injunction to play an ineligible player. Why is no one bringing this up
5
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:02 pm to SaintLSU
KDS
Kiffin Derangement Syndrome
Kiffin Derangement Syndrome
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:03 pm to SaintLSU
We need to stop brining him up as much and start bringing up Bama’s boy more. They literally had none of this reaction for that.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:05 pm to Raging Tiger
quote:
We need to stop brining him up as much and start bringing up Bama’s boy more. They literally had none of this reaction for that.
They did react to this. They stopped him from playing. It took 5 games but they still managed to stop him from playing
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:09 pm to SaintLSU
Yea that’s fine, but for them to justify why no recourse? No retroactive punishments like they are attempting to do with us.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:11 pm to SaintLSU
Exactly. Ineligible. Local ole miss judge says he can play. He’s gonna play and is now eligible for a SIXTH year. No one cares. And he’s literally their best player vs our guys who were fringe or not even make rosters at next level. Selective outrage is infuriating
You’d think fricking chase and Jefferson came back with how they’re describing it
You’d think fricking chase and Jefferson came back with how they’re describing it
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:11 pm to SaintLSU
quote:
They did react to this. They stopped him from playing. It took 5 games but they still managed to stop him from playing
The SEC didn’t stop him. The judge denied an injunction, and the TRO expired.
The SEC’s reaction to a former pro actually playing in 5 games didn’t register a blip on the radar.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:11 pm to SaintLSU
Were there any repercussions? Did they go after Alabama like a spider monkey on Mountain Dew?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:11 pm to SaintLSU
Maybe we, and others haven't whined enough.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 5:18 pm to SaintLSU
The SEC never declared Chambliss ineligible. Like many other players, Chambliss filed a lawsuit challenging an NCAA eligibility ruling on a medical redshirt, got a home-town TRO, and will play based on that TRO.
The SEC has nothing to say about the Chambliss situation because the SEC does not have medical redshirt rules.
The SEC made a rule about "NFL players" that the SEC (stupidly) interprets to apply to players who participated in preseason camp but failed to make any NFL roster or practice squad. LSU has previously said it will play guys who violate this SEC rule. That is why the SEC sued LSU.
The SEC has nothing to say about the Chambliss situation because the SEC does not have medical redshirt rules.
The SEC made a rule about "NFL players" that the SEC (stupidly) interprets to apply to players who participated in preseason camp but failed to make any NFL roster or practice squad. LSU has previously said it will play guys who violate this SEC rule. That is why the SEC sued LSU.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News