Started By
Message

re: Stuff plus metric for d1 college pitchers

Posted on 5/31/23 at 5:29 pm to
Posted by brett408
Member since Jan 2005
2426 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 5:29 pm to
It is interesting that Wake Forest’s #1 isn’t in the top 60. He is really good.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
80074 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 6:38 pm to
Yeah, i thought lowder would be up there. Whats funnier, is seeing multiple college pitchers ask this dude for their stuff metrics openly on twitter, i saw a citadel and washington pitcher ask for it. Pretty terrible their coaches dont provide it
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
22174 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

It is interesting that Wake Forest’s #1 isn’t in the top 60. He is really good
We have 3 guys ranked ahead of the first from WF based on this metric.

we have more guys on this list than any other team in fact. I’ve seen so many people shite on CJJ for not bringing in any pitchers yet he landed the best pitcher in college baseball and we’re down 3 really good ones to injury. May have been able to run coast to coast #1 had those guys been available.
Posted by brett408
Member since Jan 2005
2426 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 7:33 pm to
Had Shores and Edwards been available, we would be the #1 overall seed. We would not have lost to Kentucky once, we would have swept State and won at least 2 at Auburn.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram