- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stop making the “the play was non reviewable “ argument.
Posted on 5/26/24 at 2:18 pm to 1609tiger
Posted on 5/26/24 at 2:18 pm to 1609tiger
quote:
Stop making the “the play was non reviewable “ argument.
Correct, but it is so rare to see a dead ball spot call overturned 2 or 3 minutes after the play that is makes the stupidity of the situation magnify.
If you see it, immediately call it since the ball is dead. If not, move on. You make yourself look foolish by saying I didn’t see it when it happened but after talking together suddenly I did see it.
0
Posted on 5/26/24 at 3:03 pm to 1609tiger
Every part of a play is not reviewable
Posted on 5/26/24 at 3:19 pm to 1609tiger
Umps talking things over is not reviewing anything
Posted on 5/26/24 at 3:19 pm to paulb52
Why are we still talking about this shite. We are playing in the championship
Posted on 5/26/24 at 11:18 pm to 1609tiger
quote:
even if you think he was the batter had clearly backed out and given up on swinging meaning you can’t call catcher interference!
False. The rule has been posted. Read it.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 8:04 am to 1609tiger
So I hate to do this but according to this youtuber it was a good call and isn't reviewable. The broadcasters were focusing on the wrong rule.
Why trust this youtuber? She well he, is very spot on the rulebook. There are plenty of other videos posted by her that are spot on. You may disagree but the explanation makes it clear, it was a good call.
Why trust this youtuber? She well he, is very spot on the rulebook. There are plenty of other videos posted by her that are spot on. You may disagree but the explanation makes it clear, it was a good call.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 8:24 am to fastlane
quote:
Wait what happened?
You have to be trolling
Posted on 5/27/24 at 8:32 am to KennabraTiger
quote:
it was a good call
yes, had the judgement been correct
The judgement call was in correct
Not one of the crew members has come forth and definitively claimed the saw the catcher on or in front of the plate without the ball. If you disagree please provide a link for us.
Head Ump plainly stated it was a judgement call. It was wrong
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:01 am to Number2
quote:
When there is an attempted steal of home and the catcher steps on or in front of the plate without the ball, it is automatic interference.
The rule is written to prevent blocking - not for when the catcher is moving to catch the ball in order to then make the tag.
Otherwise a catcher would almost never be able to stop a steal of home. This is all so stupid over an obvious blown call.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:27 am to DaBike
What is to keep teams from using this as a “trick” play, now that it has been ruled legitimate? Batter could step away but keep his toe on the edge of the batter’s box. I really do think it has to be explained what the catcher should have done.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 11:15 am to catholictigerfan
Neal was totally behind home plate until he turned his body to tag the runner.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News