- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So You Don't Know Why Miles Might Want to Start Jefferson?
Posted on 11/17/11 at 5:40 pm to just me
Posted on 11/17/11 at 5:40 pm to just me
% of drives led by ONLY Jefferson that have resulted in a score vs. % of drives led by ONLY Lee that have resulted in a score vs. % of drives led by both that have resulted in a score
I'm curious about this. Please consider providing such research within your next stats report. Thanks.
I'm curious about this. Please consider providing such research within your next stats report. Thanks.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 5:43 pm to Starchild
quote:
Yea, we looked good from about midway through the 3rd quarter on. What about before that? We looked like shite for the first half against a team that had no business on the field with us. We have totally destroyed some pretty good teams this year. Aside from Bama, first half of the Oregon game, and the 3rd quarter of WVU, games have not even been close. Against much better competition mind you. Now of course I think most of us were expecting a sluggish start after coming off the high of beating Bama, but not to the extent we saw.
Most of that was from letting WKU have long drives against us and not forcing any turnovers, coupled with a fumble on special teams.
We moved the ball ok on the first drive but a personal foul made it 2nd and 32 and we only made 26 of those yards back, we scored on the second drive, Sheppard dropped an easy pass on the third drive, we scored on the 4th drive, and we couldn't quite get into FG range when the half ended on the 5th drive. We scored on the 6th, safety on the 7th (that one sucked) and scored again on the 8th and 9th.
We scored TD's on 5 of JJ's 9 possessions, and of the four we didn't score on one was because of penalty, one because of a dropped pass, one because of the half ending, and one because of a safety due to shitty field position because our special teams uncharacteristically gave up a huge kickoff return and then our D uncharacteristically couldn't get a stop until 4th and goal at the one.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 5:44 pm to LSUlunatic
quote:
% of drives led by ONLY Jefferson that have resulted in a score vs. % of drives led by ONLY Lee that have resulted in a score vs. % of drives led by both that have resulted in a score
I'm curious about this. Please consider providing such research within your next stats report. Thanks.
laziness at its finest
Posted on 11/17/11 at 5:47 pm to crazyLSUfan
quote:
JJ started once and we scored 42 pts.
who was the opponent ?
until we play the same team with the same players and JL starts..these stats do not have meaning.
...may have served your purpose
Posted on 11/17/11 at 5:58 pm to Powerman
quote:
Some posters complain that Jordan Jefferson should not carry the ball because we have RBs who can carry the ball. There are only two RBs on the team who have more yards per carry that Jefferson: Ford and Blue. Meh. You always come up with these stupid poorly thought out arguments. I'm not a JJ hater but comparing a QBs rushing stats to RBs is stupid. If you're taking off on a pass play in man coverage you can get pretty large gains. If you had a stat that showed what he makes on designed runs then you might have something. Also what happens if the 6 yard rush takes away a 14 yard completion? Doesn't look so fricking great then does it?
Posted on 11/17/11 at 6:07 pm to JWill409
quote:
You would be suprised how many teams are actually interested in drafting him somewhere. A
lulz.
you people are insane
Posted on 11/17/11 at 6:16 pm to GeauxTigerTM
you frickers sure are miserable complaining about who plays QB. Does your life suck that much?
Posted on 11/17/11 at 6:34 pm to CptBengal
quote:
You would be suprised how many teams are actually interested in drafting him somewhere. A
holy shite did someone actually say that...i dont know whether to laugh or cry...OMG!!!!
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:02 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
Lee picked up a bad snap and threw it without looking at the defense.
I'm going to take flak for making this the first post I respond to, but you should rewatch the play.
He didn't "pick up" the snap. It was low, but he fielded it cleanly.
2nd, I don't see how your 2nd statement makes any sort of a positive case for Lee at all. Why do you want your QB throwing the ball without looking at the defense?
Lee made two mistakes on the play... 1) he panicked after the snap was thigh high rather than chest high. 2) This panic made him just throw the ball without thinking.
He should have thrown it away.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:03 pm to justustm2
quote:
The anger is exhibited over JJ starting and sometimes even playing. That brings about the sh@#$ing on JJ to justify the argument that JL should start. Then the JJ supporters or just fair play people feel obligated to support the notion that starting JJ is not the worst thing in the world, as some would argue. They bring out his positive qualities to justify why Miles might have chosen to start him over JL.
Some of us support which ever QB Miles chooses to start and do not feel the need to castigate his choice. Some of us do not support the denigrating any of the young men who chose to wear the Purple and Gold. We choose to support them regardless.
You nailed it.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:21 pm to OBUDan
quote:
he panicked after the snap was thigh high rather than chest high
This is accurate.
Some people just can't accept the fact that the team needs both QB's to reach its maximum potential. It's all or none.
IMO, they better get used to it, or find another team, as long as Miles is here. I think we'll see the same next year with Mettenberger and Randall. It is necessary to have a mobile QB against the best SEC defenses.
And it's actually better if that isn't in the form of a Tebow, or Newton. Because that load through the entirety of an SEC schedule is brutal, and better shared by 2, if for no other reason than insurance against injury.
And BTW, I've always been a fan of having a mobile QB, but never really warmed on the idea of a 2 QB system.
Until now.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:24 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You have spent an absurd amount of time defending Jefferson here.
He has a whole fan club.
It seems that you do this in every thread. You come in and try to put up a front of being level and fair and supportive, but you undoubtedly go out of your way to antagonize anyone who defends Jefferson.
I'm just surprised that you try to put up this "big picture" view of everything but then you can't acknowledge that about 75% (or more) of the JJ support on this board is reactionary to a lot of baseless attacks and criticisms.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:30 pm to deSandman
quote:
deSandman
You're bringing it in this thread.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:38 pm to lsufball19
quote:
I think every stat under crowton should be thrown out the window. Both QB's look like they have improved this year and I don't think it is because they are seniors.
not disagreeing but it does happen. see Jason Campbell
WUT?
Campbell is like THE case study for a guy improving with the right coaching.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:44 pm to OBUDan
quote:
WUT?
Campbell is like THE case study for a guy improving with the right coaching.
so they lost Bobby Petrino, a guy known for developing QBs, replaced him with Al Borges his senior year, and then miraculously got better because of coaching? c'mon man, really?
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:47 pm to TheDoc
quote:
10 INTs and 9 fumbles
So 19 turnovers can be attributed to JJ in 2010
I asked you yesterday and you disappeared.
Where you getting these fumble numbers from?
My impression is that you saw someone post it here once and took it as gospel.
Because those numbers aren't readily available on ESPN, LSUSports or CFB Reference...
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:49 pm to lsufball19
quote:
dude i'm just saying you said JL accounted for only 14 points in the Florida and TN games last year, which was false. i wasn't complaining about anything, just correcting a false statement
Your examples were a bit disingenous re: Florida IMO.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:52 pm to lsufball19
quote:
JL is the reason why we beat Florida last year, and even the biggest JJ homers will not back you if you don't think he was.
QBs don't win games, teams do.
JJ isn't THE REASON we beat Alabama, but he played a part.
Lee isn't THE REASON we beat UF last year. In fact, two of his biggest passing plays, including one of his TDs were 10 yard slants that TT made tremendous run after catch on.
Now, Lee gets tremendous credit for reading that blitz and beating and putting the ball in position for TT to do what he did.
But to act like Lee is the only reason we won that game is disingenuous.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:54 pm to JWill409
quote:
You would be suprised how many teams are actually interested in drafting him somewhere.
surprise me
Popular
Back to top


1





