- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So how about Sankey not having read the new 5 for 5 rule…..
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:03 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:03 am
Boy that’s not a good look
Making rules for your conference and not even knowing the rules of the whole league.
These turds at the top of these institutions must surround themselves with yes men.
Making rules for your conference and not even knowing the rules of the whole league.
These turds at the top of these institutions must surround themselves with yes men.
1
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:05 am to PunchdrunkLPdaddy
Herb Vincent attempted to clarify.. says Stankey's comments are being misrepresented
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:08 am to Honkus
I saw that last night. What was the actual question where he decided to respond with seeing a rule on a newly printed booklet as opposed to actually discussing the rule. Sounds like he was being intentionally flippant.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:09 am to Honkus
Him not having seen the rule in the ncaa rule book is still noteworthy, no ?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:10 am to Kennerkarl
What I read claimed the book was released either yesterday or the day before.
Basically he was being a dick and said he hadn’t seen the rule in the 2026-27 rule book (which was released in the last few days).
Basically he was being a dick and said he hadn’t seen the rule in the 2026-27 rule book (which was released in the last few days).
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 7:11 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:16 am to St Augustine
quote:
Basically he was being a dick and said he hadn’t seen the rule in the 2026-27 rule book (which was released in the last few days).
I don’t think he was being a dick. I think he was trying to be very technical and thoughtful of what he was saying. Attorney’s like to ask questions that trip people up so they can use their words against them. This “quote” is likely being blown way out of proportion, as Herb Vincent noted.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:17 am to St Augustine
quote:
Basically he was being a dick
He deserves it being portrayed as it is.
These guys have millions on the line and he didn’t even wait to hear their testimony
Posted on 9/4/26 at 7:18 am to St Augustine
quote:
Basically he was being a dick and said he hadn’t seen the rule in the 2026-27 rule book (which was released in the last few days).
It's notable because the published/codified rulebook does not have any language excluding the Class of 2022.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News