re: Serious Question - What is a "true tiger?"

quote:

---

Nope. 541 points > 438 points

---

ranter. Even if looking solely at total points scored is the best method, you'd still be wrong. The net (offense points scored - defense points given up) still favors 2006.

2007: 541 scored, 279 given up = 262 net

2006: 438 scored, 164 given up = 274 net

2006 losses: #3 Auburn (finished #9); #5 Florida (finished #1)

2007 losses: #17 Kentucky (finished unranked); UR Arkansas (finished unranked)

I'm not sifting through all the bullshite of this thread, but the real answer to this question is not race like you seem to imply.

It's the fact that Keiland is a 5-star RB with great speed and quickness, yet he seemed to pussyfoot too much.

However, towards the end of the year, like in the Arky game though, he clearly should have been in over Scott. At that point he was hitting the holes hard unlike Scott and was just on another complete level in terms of explosiveness.

These sports related info/posting sites are good for us as fans collectively to get our message out. I honestly think that this board helped get the DC situation straight this season.

On other hand, it also allows douchebags rag on the players/coaches when it isn't called for. Douchebags will be douchebags.