- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:01 am to rtgr
Stingray. Then don't post on a thread you think sucks because you in fact are endorsing it.
rtgr - you come on here and flame with no substance to your argument. You obviously have little knowledge of LSU football history or tradition. Probably because you are too young to even know enough of it to matter. So you just try to bash other people to make your own lame self feel better. I still haven't heard a logical statement regarding football yet. I've heard about your goats and personal relationship with goats but nothing pertaining to your thoughts regarding if the history of LSU football was positively or negatively influenced by RP which is what this discussion was all about. Go feed your goat.
rtgr - you come on here and flame with no substance to your argument. You obviously have little knowledge of LSU football history or tradition. Probably because you are too young to even know enough of it to matter. So you just try to bash other people to make your own lame self feel better. I still haven't heard a logical statement regarding football yet. I've heard about your goats and personal relationship with goats but nothing pertaining to your thoughts regarding if the history of LSU football was positively or negatively influenced by RP which is what this discussion was all about. Go feed your goat.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:08 am to TigerWilson88
Wilson, it's the rant man don't take everything so dam personal, gotta have thick e-skin.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:11 am to missloutiger
lsu wins the title this year with rp at the helm
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:18 am to TigerWilson88
In 08 lsu would have been better with him, in 09 it remains to be seen
We are probably better in 2010 because of his early departure though
We are probably better in 2010 because of his early departure though
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:20 am to rtgr
quote:
BTW, your goat is just fine and grazing in my back pasture.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:20 am to Ron Mexico
quote:
lsu wins the title this year with rp at the helm
would jefferson or lee have played during the 3 game suspension??
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:25 am to TigerWilson88
quote:
Then don't post on a thread you think sucks because you in fact are endorsing it.
It was obvious that we should have gotten rid of RP, and Coach Miles really does not need any of the fans' second guessing on this issue.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:26 am to ForeLSU
quote:
would jefferson or lee have played during the 3 game suspension??
Jefferson was playing high school football at the time, so Lee or Hatch would have had to play in the SEC championship game.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:30 am to Stingray
quote:
Coach Miles really does not need any of the fans' second guessing on this issue
it's a message board that's what it's for, they f'ing question every move miles makes on here. He is beating a dead horse but shite who doesn't on the rant.
This post was edited on 11/4/09 at 10:35 am
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:38 am to Stingray
quote:
It was obvious that we should have gotten rid of RP
I agree. I think he served his purpose during 07 and positivley influenced the history of LSU football. Had he had better self control, I think we win 2 more games last year (defense was just too bad) and this year we might be competing for the NC.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:42 am to missloutiger
Second guess Miles when he recruits a bad player, when the game plan is bad, when the 2 minute offense sucks, or when he says something doumb to the media.
Don't second guess the RP decision.
1.RP was given multiple chances.
2.Miles did not want to screw this kid, nor did he want to screw his team's chances, not to mention getting rid of RP could put Miles on the hot seat. Don't you think Miles put some thought into this decision?
Don't second guess the RP decision.
1.RP was given multiple chances.
2.Miles did not want to screw this kid, nor did he want to screw his team's chances, not to mention getting rid of RP could put Miles on the hot seat. Don't you think Miles put some thought into this decision?
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:47 am to Stingray
Miles did perfectly. RP needed to go. He served his purpose in 07 but you just can't let that behavior ruin the rest of the team. RP could have Positively influenced Tiger football history twice...but just couldn't control himself... 
Posted on 11/4/09 at 10:51 am to TigerWilson88
Our program has 3 national titles in over 100 years of playing football. Hard for me to see how the Tigers beat Tennessee without him (and he played a very good game, by the way - check the stats for one thing). This alone does it for me.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 11:34 am to Stingray
Stingray - The issue posited in the original post is NOT whether RP should have been booted. Rather, the issue raised in the original post is whether LSU had a net benefit from RP's presence at all.
Now quit being an a-hole.
FTR - I think the '07 MNC is worth the '08 record and the '09 record whatever it might be.
However, if we never had RP, would we have recruited a different QB in his place that year?
Now quit being an a-hole.
FTR - I think the '07 MNC is worth the '08 record and the '09 record whatever it might be.
However, if we never had RP, would we have recruited a different QB in his place that year?
Posted on 11/4/09 at 11:40 am to just me
Just Me, I have figured that out now.
Maybe this could have been worded differently:
That statement makes no damn sense.
And this. Which is just another example of how this question can't be answered and is better off not being brought up.
Maybe this could have been worded differently:
quote:
Were we better off with him or without him.
That statement makes no damn sense.
quote:
However, if we never had RP, would we have recruited a different QB in his place that year?
And this. Which is just another example of how this question can't be answered and is better off not being brought up.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 11:41 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
the qb even though he inexplicably was the mvp.... did not win the game for us..... we beat tennesse because of the Defense...
FIFY
He was a talented QB and could have done great things, but he was a cancer that couldn't be cured here. He set us back 2 years, but I believe the Team is better without him now.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 11:44 am to just me
quote:
However, if we never had RP, would we have recruited a different QB in his place that year?
if not a QB in 05 (Colt?), we almost definitely woulda gotten another talented kid in 06 (Snead?).
Posted on 11/4/09 at 11:45 am to TigerWilson88
quote::beatdeadhorse: :beatdeadhorse: :beatdeadhorse:
RP.
Posted on 11/4/09 at 11:48 am to Jrv2damac
Short term(2008) = better with him
Long term(2009-) = better without him
Long term(2009-) = better without him
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News