- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember all the OSU fans that trash talked Burrow after he transfered? Oh wait
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:53 am to Buckeye Jeaux
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:53 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
I see you have 27 posts on this site. Try treating these guys like adults for 2700 post, then I may heed your advice.
Bullfrickingshit. I was overly cordial with you in the beginning even though I figured you as an alter and an extremely weird person. You went off the rails in the discussion about the one particular 40 yard pass that you then extended to every pass made from 40 to 99 yards to try to prove your point. You changed the way people talk to you, it's not the others that changed. Don't try to play the victim now.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 5:58 am to BuckeyeLew
quote:
Until this fall all we have is opinion and hype. I do believe you to be correct in your opinion. I also see that from an outsiders perspective our opinion seams based in fiction.
This guy gets it 100%. We all hope Burrow hits those numbers, but until we see what this new offense looks like, a large number of LSU fans will remain skeptical. We've heard this same stuff for over a decade and that includes Orgeron's first two seasons. Even in his interim year, he did an on field interview after the Missouri game where he said "I wish we could have scored more points. That's how we're gonna play. Pedal to the metal. Go, go, go." And we've yet to see that again.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 6:00 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
They demand to be bitch slapped every now and again. And then they're tolerable.
You have never bitch slapped one person on this board. You take it on the chin in every debate like....

Posted on 7/27/19 at 8:18 am to TigerLunatik
quote:I recall. I mentioned that "underthrows" are often intentional on long passes (whether the WR is in front of, or behind the DB), and provided links all the way back to the 60's or 70's from NFL QBs.
You went off the rails in the discussion about the one particular 40 yard pass
Your little group unanimously disagreed (which in your tiny football minds is the same thing as being right)
This post was edited on 7/27/19 at 8:20 am
Posted on 7/27/19 at 8:29 am to TigerLunatik
quote:No one buys your bullshite. The O-Bashers attack EVERY poster who posts positive comments. Lew has had fewer than 30 posts and he is already being attacked - and he is being a complete gentleman.
You changed the way people talk to you, it's not the others that changed. Don't try to play the victim now.
And I'm sure you think your juvenile horseshite is powerful stuff. It is not. It is a pathetic attempt to appear tough - it ain't working. Not even a little bit.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 8:47 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
I mentioned that "underthrows" are often intentional on long passes (whether the WR is in front of, or behind the DB), and provided links all the way back to the 60's or 70's from NFL QBs.
Then the conversation changed to how difficult a 40 yard throw to a receiver covered man to man with a step on the DB would be. You decided it was hard and when everyone else said that's an easy throw for an NFL QB, you started listing percentages for ALL passes thrown 40+ yards. You used a large number of data points to try to disprove one specific data point. It was the one the most ridiculous discussions I've seen on here in quite some time. It was probably worse than the jugs machine nonsense.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 8:49 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
And I'm sure you think your juvenile horseshite is powerful stuff. It is not. It is a pathetic attempt to appear tough - it ain't working. Not even a little bit.
If I was seriously trying to appear tough, I would just tell you to go frick yourself and call you a pussy. But, I'm not about all that vulgarity and nastiness. Even though we disagree A LOT, that doesn't mean I don't think you have the right to post what you want to post. I respect your right to do that. Trust me, I am in no way trying to act like a tough guy to someone that supposedly lives 1000s of miles from me. That's ridiculous.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 8:49 am to TigerLunatik
BTW, your gif of Tyson brings up a case in point on false narratives from hack sportswriters (like Haskins beat out Burrow for the starting QB slot - or Haskins has a "bigger arm" - he doesn't).
The case in point - Matt Baranski was one of Tyson's trainers - he was mainly Tyson's S&C guy during Tyson's best years and he was in Tyson's corner in all of Mike's fights before Don King F'ed up Tyson's career. Baranski was also Tyson's first trainer, while Tyson was still in reform school.
Some hack writer once described Matt as Tyson's "cut man". Tyson almost never had a cut, and never needed a corner cut man. But to this day, almost every article that mentions Baranski calls him, "Tyson's cut man". That pissed Baranski off til the day he died.
The case in point - Matt Baranski was one of Tyson's trainers - he was mainly Tyson's S&C guy during Tyson's best years and he was in Tyson's corner in all of Mike's fights before Don King F'ed up Tyson's career. Baranski was also Tyson's first trainer, while Tyson was still in reform school.
Some hack writer once described Matt as Tyson's "cut man". Tyson almost never had a cut, and never needed a corner cut man. But to this day, almost every article that mentions Baranski calls him, "Tyson's cut man". That pissed Baranski off til the day he died.
This post was edited on 7/27/19 at 9:12 am
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:07 am to TigerLunatik
quote:Please. Again the fact that a dozen non-players agree that something is wrong, does't make that agreement a fact.
Then the conversation changed to how difficult a 40 yard throw to a receiver covered man to man with a step on the DB would be. You decided it was hard and when everyone else said that's an easy throw for an NFL QB, you started listing percentages for ALL passes thrown 40+ yards. You used a large number of data points to try to disprove one specific data point. It was the one the most ridiculous discussions I've seen on here in quite some time. It was probably worse than the jugs machine nonsense.
The intentional underthrow goes all the way back to Unitas and Berry. Denying this is beyond absurd. And Jugs machine reps (100 a day minimum) is an absolute staple for elite WRs. Any guy who has ever been around NFL receivers knows how pathetically silly the Bashers are being on this point.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:11 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Any guy who has ever been around NFL receivers knows how pathetically silly the Bashers are being on this point.
YOU are the one bashing Moffitt and Orgeron here. In fact, I believe that you are the only one continually bashing them for this.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:17 am to Buckeye Jeaux
Also, since I'm in a great mood today, I would like to repeat that I respect that we can have disagreements without the nastiness and vulgarity. I also appreciate that you're one of the only ones (if not the only one) of people that call me hater but still respond to my positive posts about Coach O. I do thank you for that.
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:21 am to TigerLunatik
quote:Not bashing, pressuring. There are a few old guys (Oregeron, Moffitt, and E) who seem to be well behind the times on WR training needs.
YOU are the one bashing Moffitt and Orgeron here. In fact, I believe that you are the only one continually bashing them for this.
HUGE wasted opportunity here to get LSU's WRs up to the "hands level" of Bama, Clemson, and Ohio State.
No full-access to Jugs? That would be like wanting an elite golf team but refusing to provide a practice range and putting greens. (where guys could go out hand hit shots for a couple hours a day - whenever they can squeeze it into their schedule).
This post was edited on 7/27/19 at 9:25 am
Posted on 7/27/19 at 10:11 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Not bashing, pressuring.
Sounds good. Then everyone is pressuring him to win the division. I'm so glad we found a middle ground here!


Posted on 7/27/19 at 2:15 pm to Monkey business
how about all the LSU fans trashing Joe? I was the first one on here touting him and multiple "his only school interest is cincinnati not LSU material" soon followed
This post was edited on 7/27/19 at 2:16 pm
Back to top
