Started By
Message

re: Pretty funny by Guilbeau

Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:23 pm to
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Then you are saying, "We definitely would have scored with Lee in, the QB didn't matter."



Links?




It's like two fricking posts up man:

quote:

To believe LSU couldn't have scored 6 pts with 2/3rds of the game left, with Lee at QB would take a herculean effort of moronic proportion.



Give it a break.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

You don't read him. You admitted it you dumbass

I admitted I STOPPED reading him, which means I at one time did read him. I know his schtick, and make no mistake, it is schtick. I doubt he honestly believes anything he writes. You probably think Skip Bayless is giving his honest opinion, too.

quote:

Find one that you have an issue with.

How about this one?

"It is a surprise that Miles did not somehow get Jefferson named homecoming king at halftime or have him ride out beforehand on top of Mike the Tiger's cage. Jefferson is in his last season, but do not be surprised if Miles somehow gets him some playing time next season."

Yes. Stunning wit. It's the standard Miles loves JJ line, which is just silly. I've got the good sense not to debate that on the merits -- it's a personal attack in the guise of a column. Red meat for the base, who already hate JJ.

quote:

Talking about something you haven't read. You are intellectually dishonest and not even good at it.

I did read this whole thread. I think I was able to pick up on the subtleties of Guilbeau's column from the quotes and the ensuing debate. Seriously, I can't believe anyone takes Guilbeau seriously. He's paid to troll the LSU fanbase. He's good at it, but a puppy dies every time someone reads one of his columns.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86461 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:23 pm to
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42192 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

Yes. Stunning wit. It's the standard Miles loves JJ line, which is just silly. I've got the good sense not to debate that on the merits -- it's a personal attack in the guise of a column. Red meat for the base, who already hate JJ.


It is straight up hack journalism and a personal swipe. I'm embarrassed for those that support comments like this.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297018 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Then you are saying, "We definitely would have scored with Lee in, the QB didn't matter."



Links?




It's like two fricking posts up man:

quote:
To believe LSU couldn't have scored 6 pts with 2/3rds of the game left, with Lee at QB would take a herculean effort of moronic proportion.







Give it a break.



Not only is your comp shitty, you don't now the meaning of "definitely."

WTF is wrong with you? Do you understand what "could" means? God damned you are either really drunk or just f'king stupid.
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 8:30 pm
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86461 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

How about this one?
It fit the scenario. I know you hate that it does. Guilbeau sucks donkeys. As I've posted before, I've even written the Town Talk about him. He nailed this one.
Posted by SECTiger1
Edinburgh, IN
Member since Jun 2011
199 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:35 pm to
Article is very accurate. JJ doesn't make the reads fast enough, misses open recievers and is erratic. JL is not perfect but he IS more efficient and knows where to put the ball and why. I hope JL starts v OM and AR.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86461 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Article is very accurate
Can't be. Baloo, dan and bees said so.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:45 pm to
I would love for any other poster to read what you are writing and say it makes sense.

Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42192 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:46 pm to
It doesnt. He just doesn't want to concede that JJ put us in a better position to win the game so he is using circular language and getting really upset.
Posted by Tyger1919
Pineville
Member since Sep 2009
1020 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:50 pm to
Why because someone thinks JL shouldnt have been benched, are JL lovers or JJ haters? I haven't seen one post saying JL should be the lone QB, they should both play like they have been why mess up the chemistry this team had?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297018 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

I would love for any other poster to read what you are writing and say it makes sense.




Yeah, it has big boy words like "could" and "bias" that you could have easily gone to your online dictionary and not made a fool of yourself.

Your link proved my point and you still don't know it...
Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9833 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:53 pm to
god that article is spot on...funny, and soooooo true...

It should be a crime what les is doing to lee....Jefferson doesnt deserve to start...
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297018 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

He just doesn't want to concede that JJ put us in a better position to win the game so he is using circular language




Really? Do you remember the original conversation? It was this, that LSU could have won the game with either QB since only 6 pts were scored in regulation. Does that remotely resemble what you just typed


quote:

and getting really upset.



Watching you eviscerate yourself is embarrassing, not driving anyone to anger.

Remember, I am the one saying that LSU could be undefeated with both.


This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 8:56 pm
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:55 pm to
This whole thread is fricking stupid.

Chicken needs to do something about this. Suspensions for posters or something.

We don't even know what's going on with the QB position. But instead of being rational, people are leaping to conclusions. It's freaking ridiculous.

We get it. You hate JJ. You love JL. STFU about it. The 10 people who keep harping about this shite are ruining it for the rest of us.
Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9833 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

You hate JJ. You love JL. STFU about it


OBUDAN???
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23332 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

It was this, that LSU could have won the game with either QB since only 6 pts were scored in regulation.
Hell roger in any game we COULD have done pretty much anything. With only 6 points in regulation we could have won with spencer ware at QB no?
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42192 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Really? Do you remember the original conversation? It was this, that LSU could have won the game with either QB since only 6 pts were scored in regulation. Does that remotely resemble what you just typed


I know what the original convo was. But there really isnt a reason to believe that lee was giving lsu a better chance to win that game. The coaches made that change because Jefferson was giving lsu a better chance to win.

I still don't see how you don't think this. This isn't a knock on lee. Just that he didn't have it that day. He has played well in all other games.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297018 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

Hell roger in any game we COULD have done pretty much anything. With only 6 points in regulation we could have won with spencer ware at QB no?


True. Which was kinda the point. LSU could still be undefeated with either or these guys flying solo.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297018 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

I know what the original convo was. But there really isnt a reason to believe that lee was giving lsu a better chance to win that game.


Who said this?????????


quote:


The coaches made that change because Jefferson was giving lsu a better chance to win.


This was never disputed.

quote:


I still don't see how you don't think this.


Think what?



quote:

This isn't a knock on lee. Just that he didn't have it that day. He has played well in all other games.



You don't even know what the conversation was, do you? Went into full bitch mode and forgot where you were.
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 9:09 pm
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram