- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Orgeron: It's going to look different, because it is different
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:43 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:43 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
In 2017 we outgained them and was was within 7 until the 4th
Were we?
1 2 3 4 T
LSU 0 3 7 0 10
ALA 7 7 7 3 24
FIRST QUARTER
TD 6:08
Irv Smith Jr. 4 Yd pass from Jalen Hurts (Andy Pappanastos Kick)
9 plays, 90 yards, 4:10
LSU ALA
0 7
SECOND QUARTER
TD 14:17
Bo Scarbrough 9 Yd Run (Andy Pappanastos Kick)
4 plays, 37 yards, 0:51
LSU ALA
0 14
FG 8:38
Connor Culp 21 Yd Field Goal
13 plays, 71 yards, 5:39
LSU ALA
3 14
THIRD QUARTER
TD 2:55
Jalen Hurts 3 Yd Run (Andy Pappanastos Kick)
7 plays, 56 yards, 2:22
LSU ALA
3 21
TD 1:48
Darrel Williams 2 Yd Run (Connor Culp Kick)
4 plays, 67 yards, 1:07
LSU ALA
10 21
FOURTH QUARTER
FG 13:25
Andy Pappanastos 40 Yd Field Goal
11 plays, 52 yards, 3:23
LSU ALA
10 24
Bama scored their second TD with 14:17 left in the second quarter to go up 14-0. We never got closer than 11 points after that.
As a matter of fact, we were down 21-3 until Darrel Williams scored a TD with 1:48 left in the 3rd quarter.
We were down 21-10 going into the fourth.
You are aware there are ways to look this stuff up to make sure what you're claiming is correct, right?
I got all this from ESPN. Check it out Roger. Make sure I'm correct. Don't take my word for it.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 3:12 am
1
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:45 am to earl keese
Never mind
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 2:54 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:47 am to la_birdman
quote:
I get it. You just don't want to blame O for any wrongdoings.
BINGO!
But to fair, Roger isn't alone as far as that's concerned.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:54 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
rodger is trying to explain that a coach being on the hotseat DOES NOT mean that coach is close to getting fired.
Only in Rodger's world.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:59 am to la_birdman
quote:
I used to think Roger was a good poster,
I did too. There was a time I use to enjoy most the stuff Roger posted. Things have changed.
quote:
He more often than not comes across like an arrogant and condescending jerk.
These days he does. It's sad. I use to consider him a really good poster.
quote:
He wants everyone to think his answer to every concern is correct, which couldn't be more incorrect.
Correct again birdman. I've come to the conclusion that Roger thinks he's better than the rest of us and that's why he acts the way he does. And again, I don't know why or when he changed.
RIP old Roger.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:07 am to la_birdman
quote:
You call it being negative, I call it being concerned with the head coach's ability to win
Roger's been on my arse since last fall for the exact same thing. I think it's really funny.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:09 am to earl keese
I don't get it., man. I just don't get it.
"There can be no legitimate concerns of the football team. How dare you question O or have concerns. Every thing is hunky dory."
I do think we have a ton of talent returning but there are still areas that need improvement.
OMG if you have concerns, you hate the team and the coach and wish for it to fail. You're no LSU fan!
Geez.
"There can be no legitimate concerns of the football team. How dare you question O or have concerns. Every thing is hunky dory."
I do think we have a ton of talent returning but there are still areas that need improvement.
OMG if you have concerns, you hate the team and the coach and wish for it to fail. You're no LSU fan!
Geez.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 3:14 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:20 am to la_birdman
I hear ya. Roger's started in with me last October I believe. He keeps telling me all my posts are negative and bash o.
Now, I'll admit that I've said a few things negative about o, but most my posts are fact filled and roger still deems them negative and bashing.
Hell it's not my opinion that our 2018 offense was the worse ranked offense since the 2014 season. That's just a fact. But to Roger, that's bashing.
Now, I'll admit that I've said a few things negative about o, but most my posts are fact filled and roger still deems them negative and bashing.
Hell it's not my opinion that our 2018 offense was the worse ranked offense since the 2014 season. That's just a fact. But to Roger, that's bashing.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:27 am to earl keese
quote:
roger still deems them negative and bashing.
I couldn't care less about how Roger deems the posts. Roger has to be right, he has to be. He'll go on and on for hours until the other person just gives up. Even if the other poster has made a very good point.
I've seen your posts about it, they are similar to mine.
It's a reasonable concern but certain posters who I won't name consider just even voicing those concerns equals wanting to see the O fail and the team and so forth.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 3:33 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:30 am to la_birdman
quote:
It's completely illogical
Truer words were never spoken.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:33 am to earl keese
Can't help everyone I guess.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:33 am to la_birdman
quote:
I've seen your posts about it, they are similar to mine.
Yes they are similar. I think you're more level headed than me and you word your posts more clearly than I do. But we usually seem to be on the same page concerning the football team.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:36 am to earl keese
quote:
you word your posts more clearly than I do
One thing I try to do, it's actually important to me to do it, is to try remain respectful. The old, "treat people as you'd want to be treated" saying.
In a nut shell, just be nice. Not kiss arse, but just be nice.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 3:42 am
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:43 am to Jack Crevalle
Dear God. Why did you start this thread?
It's the same kids, googling wins, losses, percentages, strength of schedule, humidity, start time, concession prices and Saban's underwear brand.
All to "win" a battle of anonymous posters. Very strange.
It's the same kids, googling wins, losses, percentages, strength of schedule, humidity, start time, concession prices and Saban's underwear brand.
All to "win" a battle of anonymous posters. Very strange.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 6:00 am to Goldrush25
quote:
No one is clinging to anything. We just expect all of this potential energy to be turned into kinetic energy. To do that we have to at least be competitive vs Bama this year.
Last year’s potential energy was 6-6 to 7-5 but the kinetic energy produced 10-3. Your post in no way answers why a handful of y’all are relentless in your negativity.Posted on 5/7/19 at 6:10 am to earl keese
quote:
Hell it's not my opinion that our 2018 offense was the worse ranked offense since the 2014 season. That's just a fact.
Sure it’s a fact. Just like it’s a fact that the 2018 team’s junior class was the 2016 recruiting class. Here’s another fact, the 2016 offensive recruiting class produced one regular offensive starter.
Hmmmmm.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 7:07 am to The First Cut
quote:
the 2016 offensive recruiting class produced one regular offensive starter.
Who was responsible for developing that class?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 7:11 am to Damone
quote:
Who was responsible for developing that class?
As I’ve said before, I appreciate your trolling for what it is. There’s no way someone is that dumb. Freshmen and sophomores passed up those juniors on the depth chart. Development isn’t the problem. Good try though.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:25 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
your logic says an AD would be unhappy with recent results but then not having a problem with those same results the next year.
Ricky, I don't know what years you guys are arguing over (I can only stand to go back so far and read your "retard" posts), but expectations factor tremendously in what an AD would deem "acceptable".
If the expectations for a firm in a given year is $6MM in earnings and the firm has a $9MM earnings year, does the board of directors sack the CEO? Of course they don't.
If the expectations for the same firm in another given year is $12MM in earnings and the firm has a $9MM earnings year, does the board of directors sack the CEO? Quite possibly.
It's all about expectations.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:30 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
could spit in your food and youd blame the food
No I'd beat his arse if he spit in my food or even came close to it just like I would do you. You go too far on here.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 8:52 am
Page 50 of 66
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News