- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:12 pm to bisonduck
It def could lead to more investigation that could lead to more violations. And I'm not really a homer on this board.
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:12 pm to bisonduck
quote:
You see this as a major violation?
I think we are just saying that it could easily be more than nothing...
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:12 pm to bisonduck
quote:
You see this as a major violation?
As in losing scholarships and postseason ban? No, I doubt anyone thinks that. But to say this is a non-issue is just as bad, this isn't a good thing
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:14 pm to bisonduck
quote:
most likely Cliff will play.
So Oregon doesnt believe there are consenquences for breaking the rules? Or possibly suspending a kid for a few games for repeat offender issues?
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:16 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
So Oregon doesnt believe there are consenquences for breaking the rules? Or possibly suspending a kid for a few games for repeat offender issues?
This could be a Tony Joiner moment.
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:19 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
So Oregon doesnt believe there are consenquences for breaking the rules? Or possibly suspending a kid for a few games for repeat offender issues?
No. I believe there are consequences for breaking the rules. I also don't speak for Oregon. We'll see what rules were broken. I would support a suspension as a fan. I just don't know if a citation is going get him suspended. That is what we know so far.
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:21 pm to Tigerfan7218
quote:
As in losing scholarships and postseason ban? No, I doubt anyone thinks that. But to say this is a non-issue is just as bad, this isn't a good thing
This.
No one is saying Oregon will get hammered.
We are saying this might force Chip's hand in suspending Cliff.
Hell, the NCAA might suspend Cliff for one or two games. That's what Oregon should be worried about.
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:27 pm to 7thWardTiger
The girl says she has bank statements showing payment. CBS is now reporting that Oregon will probably not get a violation - an opinion though.
However, that being said, CK needs to lower the boom. Our program has been too clean for too long to let a few guys give it a black eye.
Oregon can handle losing Harris for a couple of game.
I really didn't think we were winning anyway. However, we are a couple recruiting classes away from being there. Losing to LSU isn't the end of the world.
Harris shouldn't be that big of a factor anyway.
However, that being said, CK needs to lower the boom. Our program has been too clean for too long to let a few guys give it a black eye.
Oregon can handle losing Harris for a couple of game.
I really didn't think we were winning anyway. However, we are a couple recruiting classes away from being there. Losing to LSU isn't the end of the world.
Harris shouldn't be that big of a factor anyway.
This post was edited on 6/13/11 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:32 pm to bisonduck
quote:This is how they start.
You see this as a major violation?
Something like this gets the NCAA into your compliance office. . .sniffing.
This may not be a major, but who knows what they find when they start turning over stones?
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:35 pm to bisonduck
I usually would never post this image but in this instance, I think it is needed. You are mad.
This post was edited on 6/13/11 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:37 pm to chilld28
Might want to resize that bad boy, it's a monster
ETA: Guess you read my mind? It was fixed after I hit submit
ETA: Guess you read my mind? It was fixed after I hit submit
This post was edited on 6/13/11 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:40 pm to Tigerfan7218
quote:Yeah, I posted it and was like
Might want to resize that bad boy, it's a monster
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:43 pm to bisonduck
quote:
Harris shouldn't be that big of a factor anyway.
which is it...is this dude the best thing since sliced bread or is he a non-factor?
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:46 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
which is it...is this dude the best thing since sliced bread or is he a non-factor?
He is a bad arse cover corner. If we're playing Foles and AZ, I would be more concerned. Since our #1 priority is stopping the run, not as a big. Troy Hill is a much better tackler.
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:47 pm to bisonduck
Do you take LSU coaches as dumb or something? Do you honestly believe that if your best CB is not going to be on the field they aren't going to go right after his backup? It's called adjustments and they happen all the time
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:51 pm to Tigerfan7218
quote:
Might want to resize that bad boy, it's a monster
twss
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:55 pm to CFBfan80
quote:
However, we don't need need him for game 1. We have several guys that can return the ball well and we are stacked at CB like LSU.
Not to mention LSU runs the ball like 75% of the time and our backup corners weigh more and would be better against the run.
quote:You can't use the word "we" when describing a team when you claim 6 teams as your favorites.
Fan of: Ohio State, USC, Bama, Oregon, Oklahoma, Texas A&M
Popular
Back to top


4









