- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/8/19 at 10:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Some of them seem to not want to see success. It goes against the narrative that coach orgeron is a bumbling idiot that they made when he was hired.
I don't know why it is so hard for some of them to see and/or admit the positives that are going on with this program right now.
I don't know why it is so hard for some of them to see and/or admit the positives that are going on with this program right now.
Posted on 4/8/19 at 10:56 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
Some of them seem to not want to see success
Right on. Not all, but some fit the bill. It kills them to acknowledge things could be better next year
Posted on 4/8/19 at 10:56 pm to boxcar willie
The argument has nothing to do with 0, Roger says the 2018 offense was more productive than the 2013 offense. It’s a fact vs fantasy argument and as usual roger is on the fantasy side. That’s what the argument is about.
This post was edited on 4/8/19 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 4/8/19 at 10:58 pm to Madking
quote:
Roger says the 2018 offense was more productive than the 2013 offense.
Link?
I've got time. Let me see it.
But ÿoure lying yet again, so you cant
This post was edited on 4/8/19 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:00 pm to Madking
That's the kind of stuff I really don't care about nor do I see the point of getting dragged into such conversations. I used to get dragged into it but it's just a lot of wasted time and energy for myself personally so I try to avoid it though not always successfully but I do appreciate posters like Roger, ben coleman, and topwater trout and all the others for not letting the false narratives go unchecked
This post was edited on 4/8/19 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:04 pm to boxcar willie
He's making stuff up, so it's not worth paying attention to
It's his MO.
It's his MO.
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
But we didn’t have almost as many yards as 2013
Almost as many passing yards, more total yards from the QB position.
's a far better parallel than 2013. I believe this offense also has a higher ceiling.
You’re argument is if Burrow would’ve had an extra game that didn’t exist he might’ve passed Mett who only played in 12 games
Your response
Weird considering we just threw for 394
Seems logical to me. And everyone else who isn't xtremely biased.
Lmao but keep lying it’s funny to watch
But we didn’t have almost as many yards as 2013
Almost as many passing yards, more total yards from the QB position.
's a far better parallel than 2013. I believe this offense also has a higher ceiling.
You’re argument is if Burrow would’ve had an extra game that didn’t exist he might’ve passed Mett who only played in 12 games
Your response
Weird considering we just threw for 394
Seems logical to me. And everyone else who isn't xtremely biased.
Lmao but keep lying it’s funny to watch
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:07 pm to Madking
Nope. You lied
Link to me saying 2013 was less productive. Do it
Without leaving out quotes, with proper spelling and grammar.
Here's my unedited quote
Link to me saying 2013 was less productive. Do it
Without leaving out quotes, with proper spelling and grammar.
Here's my unedited quote
quote:
quote:
Almost as many passing yards, more total yards from the QB position. Less total yards overall.
it was more similar to 2012, but A little more productive.
There was a huge production increase from 12-13.
This post was edited on 4/8/19 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Lol I just proved you’re lying which is what I said.
You said you weren’t talking about 2013, I proved you’re lying about that.
You said it was logical to believe that in an imaginary extra game that Burrow would’ve thrown for over 370 yards and anyone who said different was biased. That is also a lie
You said you weren’t talking about 2013, I proved you’re lying about that.
You said it was logical to believe that in an imaginary extra game that Burrow would’ve thrown for over 370 yards and anyone who said different was biased. That is also a lie
This post was edited on 4/8/19 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Lol they were your posts and your grammar stupid
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:15 pm to Madking
Let me see the link to where I said 2018 is less productive than 2013
You can't. You're lying again
You can't. You're lying again
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Lol melt you loser
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:16 pm to Madking
You lied again
That's what you do
Link it
That's what you do
Link it
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:17 pm to Madking
quote:
Lol they were your posts and your grammar stupid
Was the only correct grammar in your post
Baw
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:20 pm to Madking
Thanks for proving my point

Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:21 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:26 pm to Madking
quote:
Lol single all my life? I have 3 children, one who’s already accomplished more than you in life and the other 2 smarter than you before the ages of 10. Honestly do you have anything in your repertoire besides lies and personal attacks? Any football knowledge at all? Because all I’ve seen you do is state fantasies while attacking anyone who produces hard facts. You’re a joke dude
No one believes that. "Life long batchelor" and "creepy uncle" that chases small kids around playgrounds.
You've lied multiple times in this thread, this is just another.
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:27 pm to Madking
quote:
Roger says the 2018 offense was more productive than the 2013 offense
quote:
Less total yards overall.
Derp
This post was edited on 4/8/19 at 11:29 pm
Popular
Back to top


0


