- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Never ending thread arguing about Coach O
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:41 am to RB10
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:41 am to RB10
quote:
I'm not trying to change anyone's point ben. I'm laughing at his proclamation that he's not cherry picking anything, when that's exactly what he's doing.
I'm completely shocked that this all went over your head. COMPLETELY SHOCKED I TELL YOU
His point obviously went over your head or you wouldn't still be arguing dumbshit.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:42 am to bencoleman
quote:
Was the only regular starter on the 2018 team.
Stephen Sullivan was the 2nd leading receiver on the team. Would you like to take a guess which class he was a part of ben?
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:43 am to RB10
quote:
Stephen Sullivan was the 2nd leading receiver on the team. Would you like to take a guess which class he was a part of ben
How many games did he start troll?
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:45 am to bencoleman
He started one. Dee Anderson started four. But in the land of intellectually dishonest hacks their numbers only count if they got the official start on the first play.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:45 am to bencoleman
quote:
How many games did he start troll?
As many as any receiver not named Justin Jefferson. Again ben, he was the 2nd leading receiver on the team. Sounds like a starter to me.
This post was edited on 5/13/19 at 11:46 am
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:46 am to RB10
quote:
As many as any receiver not named Justin Jefferson. Again ben, he was the 2nd leading receiver on the team. Sounds like a starter to me
That's because you are a shitty troll
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:47 am to bencoleman
quote:
That's because you are a shitty troll
Me pointing out that Sullivan is the 2nd leading receiver is trolling?
I guess troll is your go to when you can't call someone a liar because you know they're right.
This post was edited on 5/13/19 at 11:48 am
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:47 am to RB10
Miles didn't leave O with an entire roster full of starters from one single recruiting class, you can't expect Poor Ol' O to win with an empty cupboard like that!
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:51 am to bencoleman
quote:
We're simply pointing out why there was a shortage of upperclassmen along the offensive line in 2018.
thats probably because there was 5 offensive linemen who left the program before the 2017 season.
but again, don't let facts get in the way of you and The First Cut's silly narrative.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 11:55 am to RB10
quote:
Sounds like a starter to me.
no sorry. Cushenberry was the only offensive starter from the 2016 class. don't bother meticulously breaking this down into a nuanced conversation with analysis of the 2018 season. 140 characters or less please!
Posted on 5/13/19 at 12:06 pm to RB10
quote:
Me pointing out that Sullivan is the 2nd leading receiver is trolling?
I guess troll is your go to when you can't call someone a liar because you know they're right
No you calling him a regular starter is a troll but don't let a little thing like honesty get in your way.
The guy stated a fact and you've been busy trying to say a fact is not a fact for quite some time now. That makes you a shitty troll.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 12:07 pm to RMcWill1
quote:
RMcWill1
Now explain to me why I should even acknowledge your existence.
You're an alter and shouldn't be allowed here to begin with.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 12:09 pm to bencoleman
quote:
No you calling him a regular starter is a troll but don't let a little thing like honesty get in your way.
So he's the 2nd leading receiver on the team, but because he didn't play the first snap of every game he's not a starter?
quote:
The guy stated a fact and you've been busy trying to say a fact is not a fact for quite some time now. That makes you a shitty troll.
When something is factually incorrect, it's not a fact ben.
I know your grip on reality is loose, at best, but this is just ridiculous.
This post was edited on 5/13/19 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 5/13/19 at 12:13 pm to bencoleman
quote:
Now explain to me why I should even acknowledge your existence.
You want me to explain to you why you addressed me personally asking me why you should acknowledge me?
I don't think I can do that. that sounds like some metaphysical philosophical shite that I would need to smoke a couple of marijuana cigarettes to get on that level.
I'm just here to talk LSU football and chew gum, and I am all out of gum.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 12:40 pm to Damone
quote:
But in the land of intellectually dishonest hacks their numbers only count if they got the official start on the first play.
How is it intellectually dishonest to say a starter should start?
Posted on 5/13/19 at 12:42 pm to RMcWill1
Orgeron chose to live by the Political-Sword........he will face the consequences sooner than later. It is politics that got him the job, very little else
Posted on 5/13/19 at 12:52 pm to bencoleman
quote:
You're an alter
Wonder who got banned?
Posted on 5/13/19 at 1:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
When it comes to skill position players specifically, citing starts is kinda silly when there are so many other quantifiable statistics.
But you already know this. I know you do because I don't think you are dumb. I think you can be intellectually dishonest at times, but you seem to be smart enough to know what you are talking about.
But you already know this. I know you do because I don't think you are dumb. I think you can be intellectually dishonest at times, but you seem to be smart enough to know what you are talking about.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 1:20 pm to RMcWill1
quote:
I think you can be intellectually dishonest at times,
Listen, call them contributors or starters.
There's a group of 54 receivers plus one TE last season with 20-23 catches. They aren't all starters. With WRs I know that's hard but none of that group separated from the others.
I do expect huge things from Sullivan and Anderson this year though and they are quality contributors. We have incredible depth at WR.
Posted on 5/13/19 at 1:47 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We have incredible depth at WR.
see, there are things we can agree on :)
Popular
Back to top


0




