- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU suspended their coach based on nothing but a Pete Thamel story.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:20 am to xiv
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:20 am to xiv
quote:
I want to fire the coach because of the thing I said.
Oh look, another opinion. If you hate Wade for some reason, just admit it and forget this garbage charade you've been doing.
quote:
I’ve never said he was guilty of anything
quote:
I want to fire the coach because of the thing I said.
You posted both of these statements.
2
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:20 am to FightingTigers138
quote:Already did. It was my first post in the thread. But you ignored it and went with your own fantasy, so I’ve no reason to repeat myself to you.
You have said a lot of things. Can you specify which thing your were referencing?
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:21 am to xiv
The second post wasn’t addressed to you
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:21 am to la_birdman
quote:That’s part of a sentence I said. The rest of the sentence is sort of important.
I’ve never said he was guilty of anything
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:22 am to Madking
quote:But it was a gift to me from God.
The second post wasn’t addressed to you
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:22 am to xiv
quote:
went with your own fantasy
The only "fantasy" going on is you going back and forth with "I never said he was guilty of anything" to saying "I want him fired because of what I said" in the span of an hour.
You're trolling and you know it.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:23 am to xiv
quote:
Already did. It was my first post in the thread. But you ignored it and went with your own fantasy, so I’ve no reason to repeat myself to you.
So "reporting for duty", or lack there of, is your reason for firing Will Wade?
What does "reporting for duty", mean to you in this situation?
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:23 am to la_birdman
So he confirmed what was said about him earlier, he has a personal axe to grind with Wade. He just said he hasn’t been proven guilty of anything but he still wants a coach who won an SEC title 2 years after our worst season ever. The rest of his commentary should make obvious sense to everyone after reading that.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:24 am to xiv
quote:
quote:
I’ve never said he was guilty of anything
That’s part of a sentence I said. The rest of the sentence is sort of important.
Ok. Here's the rest of the sentence:
quote:
I’ve never said he was guilty of anything (other than not reporting to work when told).
Yet you want him fired because of this?
This is your first post in this thread:
quote:
Factually incorrect. They suspended him because he didn’t report for duty when told.
It’s pathetic how devoted to this fantasy so many of y’all are.
Also:
quote:
I want him fired because of what I said
Correct?
This post was edited on 4/14/19 at 2:27 am
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:24 am to xiv
I immediately corrected it and if that’s what gets your rocks off, then buddy you’ve got a condition.
This post was edited on 4/14/19 at 2:25 am
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:26 am to 00 Tech Grad
quote:
You already lied when you said he refused to meet with his boss.
He agreed to meet with them, until they attempted to ambush him at the last minute by bringing in the NCAA and their attorney without letting him have his attorney present.
They are Wade's employer not a court, they can make the rules for a meeting whatever they want them to be within the terms of Wade'd contract. Wade didn't like the conditions they set, and on the advise of his attorney at the time refused to meet which was the correct thing to do. They then suspended him which they had every right to do as stated in Wade's contract. Both parties acted in their best interest using the information they had at the time.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:27 am to la_birdman
People who can’t defend their position usually talk in circles which is what he’s doing. Any further conversation with this joke of a human being is a waste of time. He’s outted himself and his motives to be purely subjective and agenda driven.
This post was edited on 4/14/19 at 2:28 am
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:28 am to la_birdman
quote:you’re misrepresenting what I’ve said, so yeah, I’m definitely trolling you . Also any wuss who takes personal shots gets trolled. Why wouldn’t they?
You're trolling and you know it.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:28 am to Madking
quote:
o he confirmed what was said about him earlier, he has a personal axe to grind with Wade
Exactly. Just say he hates Wade or whatever, it's blatantly obvious but he continues pissing people off for kicks.
He knows full well his argument holds no water. It's just how he feels about Wade. It's that simple.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:28 am to FightingTigers138
Already covered this.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:29 am to Madking
quote:fantasy
he has a personal axe to grind with Wade.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:29 am to xiv
quote:
you’re misrepresenting
I'm not misrepresenting anything you say.
The word you're looking for is misconstruing or misunderstanding.
I'm not representing what you say in any way, shape or form.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:30 am to Madking
quote:I really enjoyed it.
I immediately corrected it and if that’s what gets your rocks off, then buddy you’ve got a condition.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:31 am to Madking
100% true.
What a habit to have on a Saturday night.
But whatever floats his boat, like I stated earlier.
What a habit to have on a Saturday night.
But whatever floats his boat, like I stated earlier.
Posted on 4/14/19 at 2:31 am to EA6B
quote:This. All things considered, there’s no reason to begrudge either party for the moves they’ve made. There’s also no reason to begrudge anyone siding with his alma mater in the standoff.
Both parties acted in their best interest using the information they had at the time.
Page 6 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News