- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU crossed midfield three times
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:12 am to TheDrunkenTigah
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:12 am to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
You're demonstrating you have a fundamental misunderstanding of college football. Just stop.
Yea, conceding any attempt at scoring with almost 3 minutes and two timeouts with college clock stopping rules while down 11 with supposedly nothing to lose is just really the smartest play.
1
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:13 am to Brazos
quote:
Brazos
Miserable frick you are. Your entire existence is surfing this site and all post so you can interject negativity at every turn. Is LSU a playoff contender? Nope. Is this a team that is getting better after a horrible start? Yep. Did this team show an effort that was better than years past against Bama? Yep. Can this team win 10 games despite huge holes on the roster? Yep. Are you a keyboard loser who has never competed for anything as evidenced by your post history? Yep
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:14 am to Tiger Voodoo
"We saw nothing Saturday night that we haven’t seen in every game in this series for a decade."
Utterly untrue. You're looking at little more than the score. We attacked them in different ways, forced them to play the entire field laterally, and were able to utilize blocking schemes that created some holes. We also set up pass plays that worked in terms of creating separation for big gains but the players couldn't make it happen. Of course, it's hyperbole to see the game as a turning point, but I am very pleased to see a more creative approach to offensive game planning.
Utterly untrue. You're looking at little more than the score. We attacked them in different ways, forced them to play the entire field laterally, and were able to utilize blocking schemes that created some holes. We also set up pass plays that worked in terms of creating separation for big gains but the players couldn't make it happen. Of course, it's hyperbole to see the game as a turning point, but I am very pleased to see a more creative approach to offensive game planning.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:19 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You said we win with two plays. At a minimum we'd have needed 3 since we'd have needed a two point conversion (not counting XPs as plays). But yea, I'm the one that's too dumb.
I said we could win slap dick. What a miserable little bitch.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:23 am to Solo Cam
quote:
I said we could win slap dick. What a miserable little bitch.
But did you really though?
quote:
If Danny make 2 of those 3 big open throws then we win that game.
ETA: I love the barrage of downvotes when someone gets clearly proven wrong. Keep them coming.
This post was edited on 11/6/17 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:26 am to justice
The overall “moral victory” crowd makes it more difficult than ever to be a fan.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:32 am to Tiger Voodoo
You wasted like 7-8 paragraphs when all you had to do is say, “I’m a huge fricking douchebag” you miserable crybaby
This post was edited on 11/6/17 at 10:48 am
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:33 am to Mr. Hangover
What makes him miserable by stating facts?
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:34 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Your right I did. So if Danny makes those throws it’s 24-24 and I have faith that they would have won. They controlled the trenches and time of possession all night.
LNCHBOX
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:46 am to Paul Allen
Perspective my man... perspective
I read a lot into people based on their outlook on certain things and how they perceive them... if he came away from this game with that outlook, then yes, he’s a miserable frick
I read a lot into people based on their outlook on certain things and how they perceive them... if he came away from this game with that outlook, then yes, he’s a miserable frick
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:46 am to Tiger Nation 84
quote:this is what i've been saying!! go spurrier for crying out loud. you're not supposed to win. you've lost 6 in a damn row. you're down 14-3 and have not challenged them on the scoreboard AT ALL. freakin grow some damn balls. forget this "don't make a mistake and regroup" crap. we pissed away a chance to possibly score, get some momentum and put the pressure ON THEM after the half.
we weren’t expected to win, so why not fricking go all out to get the win? Some trick plays, onside kick, reverses, WHERE DID THE frickING SCREEN PASS GO? If you end up losing pulling out all the stops then so fricking be it, at least you can say you threw everything at them
what happened to the guice/williams combo? te's on seam route? etling isn't a horrible runner. throw in some rpo. at least one trick play. the coaches went full on beta for that game and it's inexcusable.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:50 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:
You wasted like 7-8 paragraphs when all you had to do is say, “I’m a huge fricking douchebag” you miserable crybaby
:wah: He has a different opinion so I must attack him personally :wah: :wah: whose the crybaby?Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:52 am to Penrod
quote:ever heard of steve spurrier? he's won a few games and he didn't do things like that. dude had the pedal to the metal from beginning to end. i'm not saying do that every time. but in this particular game, yeah, it's called for. now 7 in a row. stop looking for moral victories coaches
Any smart coach would do the same
quote:beta
If you get aggressive in that situation you have a bigger chance of giving up points than of getting points.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:53 am to scorb
quote:maybe scar spurrier. but damn sure not fla spurrier
Steve Spurrier would have run the clock out in that situation.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:56 am to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:you're demonstrating that you have a fundamental misunderstanding of 6 in a row and 2 losses, one at home to troy.
You're demonstrating you have a fundamental misunderstanding of college football.
if you're going to go soft in that situation, why even play the freakin game to begin with. just forfeit. you're basically telling them we haven't challenged you and we're not going to.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 10:57 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
how we were “in it”
just my opinion, but I never felt like we were in that game, not high scoring, but a solid arse whipping by the gumps
Posted on 11/6/17 at 11:05 am to Tiger Voodoo
I'm curious... I didn't go back and look but I don't remember Bama crossing the 50 but 4 times? maybe 5 at most? If so, does that change your narrative?
Posted on 11/6/17 at 12:55 pm to SpeckTigerLure
Lol
Posted on 11/6/17 at 12:59 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Yea, conceding any attempt at scoring with almost 3 minutes and two timeouts with college clock stopping rules while down 11 with supposedly nothing to lose is just really the smartest play.
It wasn't handled well, but turning the ball over down that deep would have ended any possibility of coming back. It's easy to look back now and say...bad call.
For the record, I didn't like it either.
Posted on 11/6/17 at 1:17 pm to RedTigerRulz
quote:
It wasn't handled well, but turning the ball over down that deep would have ended any possibility of coming back
You know what else prevents you from coming back from down 11?
Not scoring any points.
quote:
It's easy to look back now and say...bad call.
I said it as it was happening and was downvoted into oblivion.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News