- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU Breaking Down Other Schools Spread Offensive Strategies
Posted on 4/1/16 at 12:37 pm to GeauxOCDP
Posted on 4/1/16 at 12:37 pm to GeauxOCDP
Actually, spreading out the field likely would open up bigger holes for Fournette. Just because you're running a spread, doesn't mean you're throwing the ball 50 times a game.
See any Tom Herman offense.
See any Tom Herman offense.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 12:46 pm to DBU
quote:
Actually, spreading out the field likely would open up bigger holes for Fournette. Just because you're running a spread, doesn't mean you're throwing the ball 50 times a game.
See any Tom Herman offense.
Bingo
Posted on 4/1/16 at 1:19 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
No matter how badly wanted or needed, the reality is over the last couple years LSU hasn't had the accuracy to feature "plenty of passing".
You realize who's problem that ultimately is right? There are 3 star and 2 star QBs that have excellent accuracy in college and we can't get our conveyor belt of 4 star passers anywhere close until they are seniors.
Evaluation, Development, Execution, Offensive Philosophy specifically passing), all of it has been a joke. Don't give me one year with a 6'4 cannon arm prototypical 5th year senior JUCO with guys who two years later are pro bowl WRs.
I've been saying this since the season ended. Why are we running a pro style offense when we can't execute the passing part at all? Why do we run that type of offense when we have in state QBs and nearby Texas QBs built to run spread offenses?
In 3 years vs LSU (including his first year vs us), home grown QB Dak Prescott, with scraps from other SEC states, completed 60.4% of his passes for 709 yards (7.38 ypa) 4 TDs 1 int, 44 car 189 yards (4.3 ypc) 3 TDs. In 3 games vs LSU he put up 900 yards and 7 TDs with vastly inferior talent. Do you SEE where I am going with this?
Switch to spread. Use all this insane talent we have at QB and WR and RB and create an unstoppable force. LSU's offense could be better than Clemson's offense if we got a guy in here to run spread and Miles kept his fingers off (except for making sure that we still power run effectively).
Air raid teams like Texas Tech (with even worse talent than Miss St) and TCU had great power run offenses. Oklahoma has a great power run offense and they grabbed an early 30s air raid OC from ECU to be their coordinator. Clemson didn't miss a beat when Chad Morris got hired away. Clemson has a great run game and they mostly just utilize the QB and RB (Gallman and Watson combined for 2632 yards 5.37 ypc 25 TDs). UNC's is even better as their top 5 rushers averaged over 6 yards per carry (#3 rusher 400 yards 5 TDs). QB Williams and RB Hood combine for 2411 yards 6.4 ypc and 30 TDs.
Look how easy Chad Kelly came in and dominated straight out of JUCO compared to Mett who even had a year to learn the offense before starting straight from JUCO.
Stop being the salmon. Hopefully change is here.
This post was edited on 4/1/16 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 4/1/16 at 1:27 pm to DBU
quote:
Actually, spreading out the field likely would open up bigger holes for Fournette. Just because you're running a spread, doesn't mean you're throwing the ball 50 times a game.
See any Tom Herman offense.
I agree that spread doesn't always = throwing 50 times a game, but it also doesn't provide bigger holes for a RB. The defense is also spread which means they would cover more of the field. There's a reason power running teams run the pro style, once the runner breaks through the concentrated defensive area there is much more open space. I would say that our inability to block hurt us more than anything last year.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 1:59 pm to DBU
quote:Or provide bigger holes for defensive penetration.
Actually, spreading out the field likely would open up bigger holes for Fournette.
Throwing in some surprise spread plays here and there is one thing, but Wider OL spacings are recruited for with forethought and tech is different.
True spread was born out of smaller programs trying to compete via the more available athletic linemen instead of hulks.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 2:09 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
True spread was born out of smaller programs trying to compete via the more available athletic linemen instead of hulks.
smaller programs like Ohio St. and Clemson. Even Alabama uses spread concepts in their offense as does about every team in the NFL.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 2:34 pm to GeauxOCDP
quote:
I agree that spread doesn't always = throwing 50 times a game, but it also doesn't provide bigger holes for a RB. The defense is also spread which means they would cover more of the field. There's a reason power running teams run the pro style, once the runner breaks through the concentrated defensive area there is much more open space. I would say that our inability to block hurt us more than anything last year.
First of all, you don't make any sense. Power running teams don't run pro style, pro style team power run, but many spread teams also power run to incredible results.
Tell that nonsense to Ezekiel Elliott and Tre Mason busting off big runs vs Alabama in back to back years. Tre Mason 5.66 ypc 164 yards, Elliott 230 yards 11.5 ypc. I didn't see Michigan St run over Bama. Wisconsin even with a healthy Corey Clement couldn't do shite.
Go look up the ypc averages teams had vs Bama. Florida, LSU, Michigan St, Arkansas, pro style offenses with top 10 (and top 5) ranked in their class RBs, did worse that teams like Mid Tenn and Ole Miss. The guys that did good...Tennessee, Clemson, ran spread with dual threat QBs. Teams with awful run games like Miss St did just as good as we did. Georgia was fortunate that Nick Chubb ran a late 80 yard TD late in the fourth quarter down by 30 when Bama was just waiting til the game was over. Otherwise, he had 19 carries for 66 yards (3.47 ypc). Seeing the difference between spread and pro yet?
LSU hasn't had an RB since Michael Ford in 2011, running option with Jefferson, average more than 3.76 ypc vs Bama with any decent amount of carries. The other guy is Charles Scott back in 2009 (Saban's 3rd year), aka, a lifetime ago.
The game is changing, and we need to keep up.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 2:52 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
Throwing in some surprise spread plays here and there is one thing, but Wider OL spacings are recruited for with forethought and tech is different.
Gary Patterson had been running pro style forever with TCU, but when Fuente left. he grabbed air raid Doug Meacham (Houston) and Sonny Cumbie (Texas Tech). His team instantly went from crappy, clunky, outdated pro style to offensive powerhouse juggernaut air raid + running game. The top 3 rushers (based on carries) went from 1114 yards 3.92 ypc 13 TDs in clunky pro style, to 2122 yards 5.6 ypc and 27 TDs in the air raid.
Charlie Strong is doing the same this year, but will have a first time play caller so we'll see how that goes. He is a disciple of Briles, Montgomery, and Babers (call him 3rd generation).
Posted on 4/1/16 at 2:53 pm to AlaTiger
quote:Exactly. I don't believe anything out of Miles' mouth
I am not expecting anything from this at all. More BS.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 4:51 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:Exactly what I meant with tech teaching and I'd expect there was some OL shuffling with the change. The prior discussion was about just spreading out a D would do the trick.
he grabbed air raid Doug Meacham (Houston) and Sonny Cumbie (Texas Tech)
Common '15 opp TTU- , TCU 55pts and LSU 56pts, so maybe the expanse between offenses isn't large as the one between conference defenses.
I'll add the "clunky" LSU offense ypp was ahead of quite a few SEC spread offenses, despite having a fairly inaccurate pass attack.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 5:55 pm to AlaTiger
Its not about figuring out how to throw the ball as you say. It is about studying what kind of plays are successful at this level and era and what out of those plays can be incorporated in your offense. This isnt a swappimg or studying of playbooks it is a swap of tapes so that there is more material to go through mental reps and planning with
Posted on 4/1/16 at 6:25 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
Common '15 opp TTU- , TCU 55pts and LSU 56pts, so maybe the expanse between offenses isn't large as the one between conference defenses.
I'll add the "clunky" LSU offense ypp was ahead of quite a few SEC spread offenses, despite having a fairly inaccurate pass attack.
Compare TCU's offensive talent to LSU's. LSU's offensive YPP was high because Fournette and Guice are two of the best RBs in all of college ball. I will not hold my tongue when I say Fournette will be only the select few in history to have over 5000 rushing yards in 3 years putting him in legend category. Guice would be the top back in the SEC if Fournette wasn't on the team. When your top two RBs average nearly 6.9 yards per carry on 350 carries with 25 TDs, in the SEC West, with an awful passing game and inconsistent blocking, it's the players, not the scheme. Darrell Williams couldn't even manage 5 yards per carry.
What do you think would happen if Fournette wasn't being the 120% focus of every snap? That at any point in time, the ball could be switched to Guice or kept by Harris or an end around with Chark/Dural? Not 3 or 4 times in a year, but 3 or 4 times per game. What about simpler passes that get our athletic and talented guys in space to make plays instead of forcing them to go deep all the time?
Do you expect RBs like Fournette and Guice to become the norm? That's our offense right now, just being incredibly more talented than 90% of the competition.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 7:29 pm to schwartzy
quote:
Nick Saban took pity on Les and wants LSU to live up to its full potential with the roster we have.
I

Posted on 4/1/16 at 7:53 pm to CajunSoldier225
To be an effective power running team, you must have more than one or two dominant O Linemen...when is the last year we had 5 dominant OLmen...several years ago!
I agree that the strategy must evolve to fit the times...and hopefully add more dominant OLmen...
I agree that the strategy must evolve to fit the times...and hopefully add more dominant OLmen...
Posted on 4/1/16 at 8:29 pm to The Mick
quote:You forgot Pre-Season, In- Season and Post Season.
Havent you guys learned yet that literally every word out of his mouth during spring and summer workouts is 100% bullshite.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 8:32 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:Meanwhile, a once stout defense became very ordinary.
Gary Patterson had been running pro style forever with TCU, but when Fuente left. he grabbed air raid Doug Meacham (Houston) and Sonny Cumbie (Texas Tech). His team instantly went from crappy, clunky, outdated pro style to offensive powerhouse juggernaut air raid + running game. The top 3 rushers (based on carries) went from 1114 yards 3.92 ypc 13 TDs in clunky pro style, to 2122 yards 5.6 ypc and 27 TDs in the air raid.
Posted on 4/1/16 at 9:59 pm to Datbayoubengal
I'm seeing how you think becoming a "spread team" would all of a sudden cause us to gain all of these phantom yards. They stopped the run vs those teams because that's what those teams do, run the ball, that's what the defensive gameplan revolved around. We are built to line up close and punish our opponent with the run. That's why we've been a 2nd half team for so many years.
Posted on 4/2/16 at 8:11 am to GeauxOCDP
quote:
I'm seeing how you think becoming a "spread team" would all of a sudden cause us to gain all of these phantom yards.
I don't think I have ever seen even one poster on here say "LSU should become a spread team". All coach Miles and Cam are saying is that we need to catch up to where the rest of the football world is on the offense side of the ball.
Don't worry, LSU football is not going to give up on running many of the archaic power run plays that you and your ilk have come so much to love.
Posted on 4/2/16 at 9:18 am to Datbayoubengal
NM
This post was edited on 4/2/16 at 9:22 am
Posted on 4/2/16 at 10:52 am to Cincinnati Bowtie
Exactly. Patterson gave up his once stout defenses for a fast paced offense.
LSU should never become a spread team. You can run read option plays and not be spread. LSU needs to add a little creativity in play calling and make teams respect the pass. Kiffin has shown that you can be a pro-style offense and score points. Saban adapts and is able to run a pro offense and still run clock and let his defense rest.
LSU has the same type of athletes on offense as Bama, and better in some cases. There is no reason our offense can't be as effective as theirs. Saban adapted 3 years ago. Les hasn't to this point
LSU should never become a spread team. You can run read option plays and not be spread. LSU needs to add a little creativity in play calling and make teams respect the pass. Kiffin has shown that you can be a pro-style offense and score points. Saban adapts and is able to run a pro offense and still run clock and let his defense rest.
LSU has the same type of athletes on offense as Bama, and better in some cases. There is no reason our offense can't be as effective as theirs. Saban adapted 3 years ago. Les hasn't to this point
Popular
Back to top
