- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Love When Peolpe Say If Mett Was Better He Would Have Beat Out JJ/JL
Posted on 1/31/12 at 10:07 am to scarfacec28169
Posted on 1/31/12 at 10:07 am to scarfacec28169
I thought this was a Mett thread but apparently the lee butthurt brigade will not move on to bigger and better things.
Sad existence but that is your choice.
Sad existence but that is your choice.
This post was edited on 1/31/12 at 10:08 am
2
Posted on 1/31/12 at 10:09 am to BeeFense5
quote:
I thought this was a Mett thread but apparently the lee butthurt brigade
How did you miss the "JJ/JL" in the title thread?
And of course you want to move on from a subject you were so wrong about. We understand totally
Posted on 1/31/12 at 10:12 am to BeeFense5
Posted on 1/31/12 at 10:13 am to RobbBobb
quote:
And of course you want to move on from a subject you were so wrong about. We understand totally
You never seem to ever answer the question but what is the objective that you and tigger seem to have here? You just constantly shite on another lsu athlete (now ex lsu athlete) and shite on the coaches. Seems counterproductive to anything positive for the program moving forward. Especially considering how good this team will be this season.
But if you want to continue crying about mediocre qb's. Then go ahead if it makes you feel any better. It doesn't make any sense. But go ahead.
This post was edited on 1/31/12 at 10:17 am
Posted on 1/31/12 at 10:45 am to RobbBobb
so here is the usual crew, just waiting for choktaw, wait for it, wait ...
Posted on 1/31/12 at 1:06 pm to buck54
quote:
Brees would have rode the pine this year. JJ was his boy toy
true...
Posted on 1/31/12 at 1:36 pm to TigerFan55555
The mad is strong with this thread. 
Posted on 1/31/12 at 1:41 pm to KennesawTiger
Posted on 1/31/12 at 1:42 pm to Mr Right
quote:
I'm thinking Mett was better but didn't have the total LSU experience and practice reps to have a factor this past year.
Mett wasn't going to play no matter how good he was, or how awesome a grasp on the playbook he had. JJ was going to be the guy.
All those who said this would never happen, you were wrong.
This post was edited on 1/31/12 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 1/31/12 at 1:52 pm to Roaad
quote:
Not playing Mett this year was a tragedy
I agree 100 %.
for some reason we refused (for the most part) to want to give him any experience.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 1:53 pm to rbdallas
Who gives a shite
Posted on 1/31/12 at 2:15 pm to RealityTiger
quote:
By the 2nd half of the rematch, I didn't give a shite who came in. Try something, anything to make a positive play on offense.
This X 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
Posted on 1/31/12 at 2:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
JJ was going to be the guy.
For being "the guy", 10 games into the season is a long time to wait to start him.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 3:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
If the staff thought that Mett would have given LSU a significantly better chance to win, Mett would have played.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 3:11 pm to just me
quote:
If the staff thought that Mett would have given LSU a significantly better chance to win, Mett would have played.
I also think the staff probably thought Mett gave LSU a greater probability of losing a game due to inexperience. (fumbles snap, throws pick, does bootleg option for TD that coach takes off board)
I kid.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 3:14 pm to just me
quote:
If the staff thought that Mett would have given LSU a significantly better chance to win, Mett would have played.
I think a lot of people don't realize how much history goes in to Miles & Co.'s choosing of personnel and play calling. Miles seems to go out of his way to avoid repeating the same mistakes and unfortunately it is sometimes to the detriment of the team.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 3:16 pm to just me
quote:
If the staff thought that Mett would have given LSU a significantly better chance to win, Mett would have played.
I don't think they gave the man a chance to prepare for this season. I have some serious questions about Miles thinking about the QB position, as a lot of folks do. Disagree if you will, but I think it's warranted. I believe it will be shown early that Mett was the best talent on the roster in the QB position and could have offered a chance in the last game.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 3:21 pm to buck54
Drew Brees being a freshman--yes, he would have sat the bench.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 3:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Mett had never seen a Div I defense let alone an SEC defense. Both Jefferson and Lee had. To overcome that experience divide, Mett had to have had a significant talent advantage.
I don't think they gave the man a chance to prepare for this season. I have some serious questions about Miles thinking about the QB position, as a lot of folks do. Disagree if you will, but I think it's warranted. I believe it will be shown early that Mett was the best talent on the roster in the QB position and could have offered a chance in the last game.
Mett may look brilliant this year against every defense he faces. However, that does not mean that he would have looked brilliant last year.
He has now learned from Krags for over a year, and he has faced LSU in practice for over a year. He also has that year of experience to deposit into his bank of confidence. It makes a difference.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 3:41 pm to just me
quote:
Mett had never seen a Div I defense let alone an SEC defense
I thought lsu was in the sec?
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News