- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lacy's attorney said way back he'd be exonerated. Update 10/07/25
Posted on 10/4/25 at 1:31 pm to Nephropidae
Posted on 10/4/25 at 1:31 pm to Nephropidae
quote:I have no clue why they would want to pin it on him.
I’m just scratching my head on why they wanted to pin the wreck on Lacy in the first place. Maybe I’m completely naive to what the motivation would be to do that.
I do have questions still even after the video. I saw that he was 72 yards from the wreck when he got back in his lane after passing 4 vehicles in a no pass zone. I haven’t seen anywhere how fast Lacy was going but I would think passing 4 vehicles it would have to be over 75.
My question is how long does it take to go 72 yards at 75 MPH? That would have been how long the person who crossed the center line and wrecked had to decide what he was going to do to get out of Lacy’s way if he didn’t get back in his own lane.
1
Posted on 10/4/25 at 1:43 pm to sharkfhin
Half of this board was calling him a piece of shite and saying he got what he deserved. Y'all should be ashamed
Posted on 10/4/25 at 1:55 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
Lacy's attorney said way back he'd be exonerated.
As do most defense attorneys.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 1:57 pm to Chad504boy
Chad I’m getting the feeling you are the dumbass trooper who was trying to falsify the report or in the very least you know that dumbass trooper.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 1:58 pm to WillFerrellisking
quote:
Chad I’m getting the feeling you are the dumbass trooper who was trying to falsify the report or in the very least you know that dumbass trooper.
Very weird comment when yall are on the high horse of being against falsely accusing people of things
Posted on 10/4/25 at 2:26 pm to sharkfhin
You can’t defend yourself from thugs behind the keyboard when only a few people knew exactly what the truth was. Just how you typing this nonsense knowing that he was innocent. A few people lied and destroyed his dream. You don’t have a clue how that made that young man feel.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 2:27 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
Lacy's attorney said way back he'd be exonerated.
as did every defense attorney in the history of defense attorneys
Posted on 10/4/25 at 3:49 pm to BayouBaw84
quote:
question is how long does it take to go 72 yards at 75 MPH? That would have been how long the person who crossed the center line and wrecked had to decide what he was going to do to get out of Lacy’s way if he didn’t get back in his own lane.
I can say that going 65 mph for example at 3.5 seconds behind a car ahead of you is roughly about 350ft. 3.5 seconds is not a lot of time but enough time to slow down of needed. 72 yards is about or around 7 seconds behind which believe it or not decently far away from the accident.
Also unless im not understanding the accident as it occured, what does who he passed or not, even matter when the accident occured "ahead" of him. Video clearly shows him approaching the accident about 6/7 seconds afterward the collision occured. At 75 mph it would have been around 2 seconds to drive 216ft(72 yards roughly) ut I dont he was going that fast at all when he approached them and passed around them.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:00 pm to sharkfhin
quote:The reason I asked is because the original reason behind the charges was the fact he was passing cars and was in the vehicle involved in the wrecks lane. The thinking was that vehicle driver panicked and swerved not knowing Lacy would be able to get back in the lane he was supposed to be in.
Also unless im not understanding the accident as it occured, what does who he passed or not, even matter when the accident occured "ahead" of him. Video clearly shows him approaching the accident about 6/7 seconds afterward the collision occured.
It’s just a sad situation all around just trying to understand what happen.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:01 pm to crewdepoo
quote:agreed.
Half of this board was calling him a piece of shite and saying he got what he deserved. Y'all should be ashamed
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:02 pm to crewdepoo
.
This post was edited on 10/4/25 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:14 pm to BayouBaw84
If the video is authentic shows that Lacy literally wasnt even involved in anything and then as he approached after the accident occured, he just drove around and by the accident. The accident didnt look horrific or anything, no over turned vehicles or no cars on fire or anything. People saying Lacy should have stopped to help is a matter of opinion. I didnt see not 1 percent of anything that KL did wrong. Accident and both vehicles were in front of him. At no time did he encounter these vehicles before the accident. How could he be, both vechicles involved in the collision were many yards in front of him at the time of impact.
This post was edited on 10/4/25 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:16 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
what does who he passed or not, even matter when the accident occured "ahead" of him.
My take: As KL was travelling southbound, he had passed up 4 cars.
Gold truck Vehicle #1 had seen him in his lane of travel (northbound) and slowed down. It was shown he was driving 28 m.p.h. at that time the accident occured.
Funyun lady traveling behind him is tailgating him at almost 50 m.p.h. and doesn't slow down because she can't see beyond Vehicle 1.
When it is too late to do anything, her choice was to either rear-end #1 or swerve left. She obviously couldn't see the oncoming car heading southbound in which the Marine vet was a passenger.
Funyun reacted by pulling hard left to try to get into a parking lot across the lane of traffic and hit the marine's vehicle.
In the video, there was a white SUV in front of Lacy. That vehicle slowed down and went around the accident as did Lacy.
Lacy had no idea that his passing cars up the road could have caused the accident and continued on his way.
He didn't "flee the scene" as was reported.
If KL was charged with failing to render aid, why wasn't the driver of the white SUV?
Why wasn't Kyren's passenger questioned as a witness?
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:10 pm to sharkfhin
I agree that in that situation most people wouldn’t stop.
On social media a lot of people are showing their ignorance about this incident. The most common comment a lot of people are saying is that this video just shows he wasn’t in the accident and I don’t know why he was ever charged his car didn’t have any damage. His charges were never about being involved in the accident they charged him with causing the accident.
On social media a lot of people are showing their ignorance about this incident. The most common comment a lot of people are saying is that this video just shows he wasn’t in the accident and I don’t know why he was ever charged his car didn’t have any damage. His charges were never about being involved in the accident they charged him with causing the accident.
This post was edited on 10/4/25 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:15 pm to BayouBaw84
Correct
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:39 am to sharkfhin
After seeing the larger picture video released by the state police I REVERSE my opinion and stand with those who disagreed with me. Im man enough to admit my wrong. This attorney is a true pos. WOW.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:46 am to Chad504boy
quote:you were right, I was wrong. Point and lesson learned.
quote:
The sensationalism on this site
Sort of like your reaction based solely on a one sided attorney trying to portray solely what he wants to portray
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:51 am to sharkfhin
the lawyer in the video says that Lacy came to a stop just as the video shows he never stops at all...
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:57 am to Chicken
Correct
The attorneys video show deception that the car appeared to be in his lane alot sooner. In that(attorney's) video its hard to see his car switching back lanes. It just looks like he was in his lane slowing down. The LSP shows the switching of the lane and the timing of the accident where KL is Negligent.
The attorney's angle i can see is he was trying to say KL was "already" back into his lane when he wasnt quite back into his lane before the car swerved into the other vehicle. His video is clearly deceiving the viewer. Smdh.
The attorneys video show deception that the car appeared to be in his lane alot sooner. In that(attorney's) video its hard to see his car switching back lanes. It just looks like he was in his lane slowing down. The LSP shows the switching of the lane and the timing of the accident where KL is Negligent.
The attorney's angle i can see is he was trying to say KL was "already" back into his lane when he wasnt quite back into his lane before the car swerved into the other vehicle. His video is clearly deceiving the viewer. Smdh.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:06 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News