re: Krysan says he sees "less than 9 wins" for LSU

quote:

---

We only beat them by 10 2 years ago and I think THEY have improved more than LSU!!!!

---

Based on what? IMO, last year was their opportunity if there ever was one. BTW in 2008, LSU was up 34-17 when Miss St. finally scored again to close the gap with 4:54 left in the game. I don't believe there was a real threat in 2008. With the score 34-24 we were simply running out the clock with the last 2:34 left to play.

quote:

---

Posted by josh336
Its not really ridiculous to think Miss St. could beat us. They should have beat us last year and they will be better.

---

Not sure they will be better. They lost the guy who was cleary their best player.

quote:

---

Without a playoff it is the system we are dealt. Anyone worth their salt would put BSU in the top two or three. Again, they stand the best shot at going undefeated.

---

Anyone who knows ANYTHING about football knows that boise is not even close to a top 2 or 3 program...not even close. They have recruiting classes consistently in the 30's and 40's....don't fool yourself into thinking they have some magic formula to make all these two stars 5 star performers...look how many they get into the nfl. Their gaudy record is a product of them being a "FAIR" team playing in a ridiculous conference. It would be equivalent to Ole Miss going to their conference....Ole Miss would be the Shiiiittt. It is a joke they are ranked there, because it is not based upon how good the team actually is, but it is totally based upon the fact they play such a ridiculous schedule so therefore they have a good shot at going undefeated...think about it...they play TWO games that they can possibly lose....Va. Tech on a neutral field...and Oregon State at Home...period...they CANNOT lose any of their other games. If you think that alone justifies them being number 2 or 3 so be it. If you think they would come to the SEC and have even close to the success they are having...well......i'll leave that one alone.

quote:

---

Don't misquote me. I never said 7-5 "at best". At best, we could win 9 or even 10 games. 7-5 is my PREDICTION, not the best case scenario. And I've always said 6-6 (or worse) is less likely than 7-5 or better.

---

You CAN'T have a range from 6 to 10 games as your PREDICTION. You predict 7-5...that is what you think of them. Don't come jumping on the bandwagon when they are 10-2 or 11-1 and you have been (as usual) way wrong. Indicentally, how did that big prediction that time work out about them going what was it 3-9 or 4-8...after that loss. You are the classic bandwagon fan...period...and an ignorant one...

This thread has digressed...

Does Krysan still have that awful mullet?

quote:

---

I would rank Boise number two. They have the best shot at going undefeated of any team in the nation. An undefeated

---

perfect example of arse backwards logic. Well done.