- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kelly appears adamant
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:26 am to Vyvanse
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:26 am to Vyvanse
Durham ran 17 times for 74 yards. 4.4 ypc
Zavion ran 3 times for 27 yards. 7.8 ypc
There were 11 other runs by various players, including the sack yards, that bring the average down. We ran the ball just fine considering the stout defense we were playing.
The Oline produced running lanes. We are going to be solid running the ball this year.
Zavion ran 3 times for 27 yards. 7.8 ypc
There were 11 other runs by various players, including the sack yards, that bring the average down. We ran the ball just fine considering the stout defense we were playing.
The Oline produced running lanes. We are going to be solid running the ball this year.
0
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:30 am to ShockG082
Let's see how we do vs Florida. Florida has a good defense. It was the first game with all new starters on the o line. I think the Tech game will allow them to work out some kinks and be ready for Florida.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:41 am to Vyvanse
Sloane needs to run more of the misdirection runs. Those have a competitive advantage. The straight up off tackle runs are putrid and outdated (waste of downs)
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:44 am to Vyvanse
We had 4 ypc before they tried running th clock out. They ran the ball well. 3.8 isn’t abysmal. Calm down.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:52 am to ShockG082
Posted on 9/1/25 at 9:11 am to White Tiger
quote:
I am not convinced you know this to be true. How about explaining it?
I’m not 100% sure it’s the best defensive live we will play all year. I’m just going off mock draft predictions. I’m making an assumption based on talent.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 9:26 am to bayou85
Add in the two kneel downs by Nuss.
I thought LSU ran the ball effectively.
I thought LSU ran the ball effectively.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 9:27 am to ShockG082
quote:
I enjoyed premiering only 1 feature back
Well thats good. We have exactly 1 SEC level RB
Posted on 9/1/25 at 9:43 am to Lakeboy7
We do have some talent there, but not a ton of depth. I think that’s a sign of the times and the transfer portal. Who wants to be part of a stable of running backs with depth?
Posted on 9/1/25 at 9:48 am to ShockG082
I thought our blocking was good but we need a bigger running back. We washed the defenders down which opened up a big hole to the backside on a number of plays but our backs didn't take advantage.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:05 am to Sofaking2
OK. 
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:21 am to ShockG082
I don't know why we insist on running it up a crowded middle.
If the lane isn't there go around the side.
If the lane isn't there go around the side.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:23 am to FightinTigersDammit
And his sack yardage. We actually ran for like 120 or so.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:35 am to Vyvanse
No our feature RB Cade D averaged almost 5yds a carry, kept us in great 3rd down situations - look Clemson deliberately went out and got Allen to stop the run game. He’s got one of the best DLs & LBs crews in the country. LSU continued to establish and run the ball and complete enough throws to move the chains. It was a great game plan. The Defense was everything we heard it was during the fall even though we crushed our new OL everyday. OL was pretty dam good and the Defense was No myth this camp it was the real deal Saturday Night in Lil Death Valley.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 12:20 pm to White Tiger
LSU thankfully was able to run it 31 times in 70 plays. Only 3.5 yards a carry, but it also helped LSU control the clock for 37 minutes as well. They were able to keep a balanced attack and keep the ball away from Clemson. That’s my opinion. I think LSU did enough against a stout Clemson defensive line. I guess we will see in the coming weeks if LSU can run better, worse, etc. I do feel like they need to be committed to the run rather than being one dimensional.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:36 pm to Sofaking2
What remains to be seen is whether BK can keep them focused.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:42 pm to ShockG082
quote:
We won’t see a more talented defensive line the rest of the year
bama d line, Florida d line, A&M d line.
All three better than Clemson d line
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:44 pm to ShockG082
I’m as excited as the next over winning Saturday but we can’t forget the fact that a lot of the play calling was atrocious.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 3:21 pm to White Tiger
This is Kelly’s year to get it done. He has everything lined up. Of course hopefully no major unforeseen injuries and Kelly has no more excuses. We even won our first game on the road against a talented team.
This post was edited on 9/1/25 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 9/1/25 at 3:26 pm to Vyvanse
Knock knock knock hello…. Clemson is very good especially their front seven. Possibly best we’ll see all year!
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News