- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Just noticed something in the 2003 NCG
Posted on 7/10/08 at 2:18 am
Posted on 7/10/08 at 2:18 am
I think JV drops the ball inches before crossing into the endzone. Technically it could've been called a fumble. Do you agree?
LINK
Freeze at the 18 second mark.
LINK
Freeze at the 18 second mark.
6
Posted on 7/10/08 at 2:20 am to BayouTigers4Life
its close but if that had been called a fumble that would be nit picking like a mother fricker considering no ou player was near him on the score
Posted on 7/10/08 at 2:27 am to heartbreakTiger
Close, yes. But the ball did cross the plane
.
.
Posted on 7/10/08 at 2:43 am to BayouTigers4Life
quote:
Technically it could've been called a fumble. Do you agree?
I disagree. He demonstrated possession well into the end zone. It was careless ball handling, as it could have slipped early, but he was carrying the ball in his lead hand and it most certainly broke the plane in his possession.
Posted on 7/10/08 at 3:04 am to Ace Midnight
no way was that a fumble
he crossed the plain of the endzone and then dropped the ball
it did look a little careless but who cares
now if he was being tackled at the endzone and did something similar then yea, I could see that being called a fumble
he crossed the plain of the endzone and then dropped the ball
it did look a little careless but who cares
now if he was being tackled at the endzone and did something similar then yea, I could see that being called a fumble
Posted on 7/10/08 at 6:35 am to BayouTigers4Life
Not a fumble but damn close..... If you freeze it just before he gets to the goal line the ball looks like it's "about" to be let go of. Careless play by JV and if I was a coach I would get on his arse about it. But hey, that's what kids are taught today.... look at me and how cool I am as I drop this ball or do my dance...
Posted on 7/10/08 at 6:39 am to raparoot
You're a tool.
Thread over.
Thread over.
Posted on 7/10/08 at 8:33 am to CAD703X
quote:
Thread over.
Agreed! But then again, I guess I shouldnt have posted then . .
Posted on 7/10/08 at 8:39 am to TgrB8
Even though we dominated that game, we were very lucky to win that game.--we were out of gas on defense at the end.
Posted on 7/10/08 at 8:42 am to Bad Cat
Saban is not Carroll sS offense and offense related training goes 
This post was edited on 7/10/08 at 8:43 am
Posted on 7/10/08 at 8:50 am to Bad Cat
quote:
Even though we dominated that game, we were very lucky to win that game.--we were out of gas on defense at the end.
Agreed.
Watched the game again last week and couldn't help but notice that the defense was out of gas the last quarter.
Posted on 7/10/08 at 9:01 am to adono
The ball was a full yard in the endzone before he dropped it.
The ruling on the field stands. TOUCHDOWN!
The ruling on the field stands. TOUCHDOWN!
Posted on 7/10/08 at 9:06 am to BayouTigers4Life
It wasn't Leon Lett syndrome. NO ONE was near him.
(can't wait for football either, i see)
(can't wait for football either, i see)
Posted on 7/10/08 at 10:24 am to GeauxGoose
i had the same thought about richard dickson's td in the title game
Posted on 7/10/08 at 10:27 am to footballfun5155
Not only was the defense out of gas, Saban didn't let Mauck throw another pass after that INT he threw that set up OU's 2nd TD. The game was totally in the D's hands after that fake FG. We didn't even get a 1st down the last 17 minutes of the game.
It was a TD. Doucet's catch in the Arizona game is much more up in the air.
It was a TD. Doucet's catch in the Arizona game is much more up in the air.
This post was edited on 7/10/08 at 10:32 am
Posted on 7/10/08 at 10:29 am to BayouTigers4Life
quote:
Do you agree?
no...camera angle
Posted on 7/10/08 at 4:19 pm to CAD703X
"about" to let go.... sorry you can't read dude, go back to high school. What tool am I anyways?
Posted on 7/10/08 at 5:18 pm to raparoot
Td.
Posted on 7/10/08 at 6:33 pm to MissStateBoy
just touching the ball is not possession. I think he starts to yield possession before he crosses the goal line, even though he is still touching the ball a yard into the endzone. Technically, it could have been an OU touchback. However, no one questioned it because it would have been stupid nit picking. And it would have been considered too close to be incontrivertible. Thats one of those things I wish backs wouldn't do.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News