- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Rules In Favor Of Athletes In LSU-SEC Eligibility Battle...Live Updates Inside
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:14 pm to UCLAMAN
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:14 pm to UCLAMAN
Could the conferences unilaterally decide to pass laws prohibiting unlimited transfers and paying players?
No they couldn’t. So there are limits to what conferences can agree to.
No they couldn’t. So there are limits to what conferences can agree to.
1
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:14 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
Why would the judge enjoin LSU without protection?
This is going to be a ride…
This is going to be a ride…
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:16 pm to UCLAMAN
quote:
The world will be against you.
Good
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:16 pm to UCLAMAN
Dude you’re in California. Yall think men should be able to play in women’s sports.
Maybe sit this one out .
Maybe sit this one out .
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:16 pm to tigerfan88
LSU corruption tops all schools
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:17 pm to UCLAMAN
Every other local judge has granted the same shite across the country
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:17 pm to UCLAMAN
They didn’t say no to everybody else doing it currently and in the past.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:17 pm to More beer please
The world will be against you.
———
From what I’ve read this past week, it already is against us.
———
From what I’ve read this past week, it already is against us.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:18 pm to HarryHoudini
I loved it when UCLA beat LSU in California
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:18 pm to UCLAMAN
quote:
What don’t you understand ?
It was discovered today that the NCAA did not exclude the 2022 class in the 5 for 5 rule but told these players they were not eligible and continued that lie up until today.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:19 pm to UCLAMAN
Obviously the SEC is wrong, as we all know they were.
"UCLA"......
"UCLA"......
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:19 pm to UCLAMAN
I loved it when UCLA beat LSU in California
——-
Heck, we barely noticed it when we waxed your tail in the rematch.
——-
Heck, we barely noticed it when we waxed your tail in the rematch.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:20 pm to UCLAMAN
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:20 pm to UCLAMAN
and we beat the shite out of yall here. Nobody gives a frick.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:21 pm to UCLAMAN
Want us to donate to your gofundme so your athletic department can stay afloat?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:22 pm to NFLU
It took the 2nd half
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:22 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
It was discovered today that the NCAA did not exclude the 2022 class in the 5 for 5 rule but told these players they were not eligible and continued that lie up until today.
If that post was true (kentucky??) then future actions by NCAA and SEC have been seriously hampered.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:22 pm to SoloTiger
Where is Moscona right now? Eating kale and taking a cold plunge? Get your stream live already
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:24 pm to More beer please
Local Judge
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:24 pm to MrVoodoo
quote:
Because according to Sankey they left college for the pros and attended camp.
Sankey admitted to not reading the NCAA 5 for 5 rules. So why would we think he even read the SEC's own rules?
Page 99 of 100
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News