- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Josh Dworaczyk - gone or medical RS possible?
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:22 pm to gotygers
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:22 pm to gotygers
quote:
HE GETS A 6TH YEAR IF HE HAD A SEASON ENDING INJURY AND PLAYED IN LESS THEN 20% OF THE GAMES!
HE WILL BE BACK NEXT YEAR FOR HIS 6TH SEASON AND IS NOT THE FIRST TIGER TO DO THIS.
Ok -- but it does have to be approved by the NCAA, it's not automatic.... and of course, he'll have to be physically able to play and want to. Which I don't know - when they did the OL segment before the SECCG there was no mention of him declaring for an exemption and returning and I think he has graduated... he might want to hang it up. IDK
0
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:23 pm to slackster
quote:
There are no "medical" redshirts in the NCAA. They are all simply redshirts. Your reason for taking it is irrelevant to the NCAA.
negative...
quote:
2) He had an injury his freshman year that required microscopic knee surgery and he tore his ACL in his 5th year. That qualifies him under the generally accepted conditions for a 6th year.
if that's the case, and it's documented that it kept him out, then he may be able to get a 6th. Although with the expected numbers crunch, I doubt the team would push it.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:24 pm to AlxTgr
slakster they are called "hardship Redshirts" and are given to individuals who have a season ending desease or injury! I just reviewed the rules.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:24 pm to slackster
quote:
He had an injury his freshman year that required microscopic knee surgery and he tore his ACL in his 5th year.
If this is the case, then he should receive a 6th year because he would have missed two seasons (2007 and 2011) due to injury.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:24 pm to gotygers
quote:
gotygers
You are the one making things up. As stated, it's no guarantee that he would get it especially if there was no injury his FR year (I don't really know if there were any or not). However, I think he would probably be in good shape especially since it was his whole SR season that he missed
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:26 pm to slackster
quote:I had never heard nor read that his first year was injury related. If it was, then he is a classic case.
slackster
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:26 pm to slackster
Why won't he be able to play again? What are the details of his injury? ACL? Pretty normal for a full recovery?
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:27 pm to LSU91MBA
Damn - 2 pages and not one person called anyone else a "douche" ... wow 
thanks for the info and opinions... we'll have to wait and see what happens...
I hope he can and wants to play and the NCAA gives him the opportunity ... will be very nice to have another retuning stud OL. Never too many "big uglies" on a team that runs the ball like we do.
thanks for the info and opinions... we'll have to wait and see what happens...
I hope he can and wants to play and the NCAA gives him the opportunity ... will be very nice to have another retuning stud OL. Never too many "big uglies" on a team that runs the ball like we do.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:29 pm to Negatiger1986
quote:I don't know the precise nature of his injury, but "normal" recovery for an average weekend warrior is not the same as "normal" recovery for a 6'7", 320 lb. LSU offensive lineman. I'm sure he will be able to lead a relatively normal life, but probably not perform on the football field the way he used to.
Why won't he be able to play again? What are the details of his injury? ACL? Pretty normal for a full recovery?
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:29 pm to gotygers
quote:You are a moron. If you truly are looking things up, start with "6th year".
I just reviewed the rules.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:31 pm to gotygers
quote:Review them again. A medical hardship waiver is not the same as a waiver of the five-year eligibility window.
slakster they are called "hardship Redshirts" and are given to individuals who have a season ending desease or injury! I just reviewed the rules.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:32 pm to LSU91MBA
Bon please read the rules its on the internet it has nothing to do with your freshmen redshirt. But in cases like this its almost a rubber stamp.
"HARDSHIP REDSHIRT"
Slackster Rule specifically states 6TH year!
LSU has done this before!
"HARDSHIP REDSHIRT"
Slackster Rule specifically states 6TH year!
LSU has done this before!
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:34 pm to gotygers
That's different from this situation. While he needs a hardship for the season, he also needs a waiver of the 5 year rule
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:34 pm to Gravitiger
quote:
a waiver of the five-year eligibility window
Were it not for the NCAA's ability to waive the 5 year rule, JD's eligibility to play college football will have expired. JD's case involves a waiver of the 5 year rule (i.e., a 6th year of eligibility). I believe you are talking about the same concept but using different terminology.
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:35 pm to LSU91MBA
he needs to start his coaching career
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:38 pm to gotygers
quote:Just stop. You are confusing a hardship waiver(1 year) with a clock extension(6th year). Here is a concrete example,
gotygers
Tech Will Seek Medical Redshirt for Suggs
The redshirt junior from Roanoke injured his left knee against Connecticut on Sept. 1 and is lost for the year.
quote:
I've talked to Mike Goforth and we're preparing the medical documents for the end of the season. That's when we apply for the medical hardship waiver. We send that in at the conclusion of the season and get the medical hardship waiver approved. At that point, we try to get the five-year clock extension.
quote:
What's normally referred to as a redshirt is when an eligible player is held out of all competition. It saves them from using up one of their four seasons of competitive eligibility. It's a conscious decision made in combination with the coaching staff and player. A medical hardship waiver, which is commonly referred to as a medical redshirt, is when there is limited competition, but a season-ending injury occurs prior to the 20 percent point of the season.
Here's where you're lost,
quote:
Q: Explain why getting a medical redshirt doesn't guarantee him a sixth year?
quote:
Once a student-athlete enrolls as a full-time student, what we call the "five-year clock" starts to tick. They have five years from that point in which to complete their four years of eligibility. Since Lee redshirted as a freshman, the 2002 football season will be his fifth year. His "clock" will expire prior to the 2003 football season. Therefore, once we get this season of competitive eligibility back through the medical hardship waiver, he will need a sixth year in which to use that because his "clock" will expire in August of 2003. So that's where we go to the NCAA, if that's what Lee and his family want, and ask for the "clock extension" and try to get that sixth year to use his regained eligibility in.
LINK
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:40 pm to Maximus
quote:
Maximus
Ahh, I knew you would appear in this thread.
Oh, and it is well-documented that you would like to see T-Bob stay on the bench his entire career, but your talent evaluation skills took a serious hit last night when he was awarded the Unsung Hero award by the coaching staff at the banquet.
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:40 pm to gotygers
It's rule 30.6...
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:42 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
Although with the expected numbers crunch, I doubt the team would push it.
I may be reading this incorrectly, but are you saying that you doubt the team would want JD to come back?
Posted on 12/12/11 at 5:47 pm to slackster
quote:I think what he is saying is that unless JD is going to be start, be 100% healthy, and be appreciably better than Williford or Collins, they don't need him back and his scholly is better used elsewhere.
I may be reading this incorrectly, but are you saying that you doubt the team would want JD to come back?
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News