- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jordan Mickey on ESPNU now
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:37 pm to LSU=Champions
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:37 pm to LSU=Champions
0
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:46 pm to bbap
quote:
Bbap
wtf...
It's not like they have rankings that include all classes.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:50 pm to dj30
the #3 player nationally would be someone behind wiggins or parker or whoever and one other player. that's just a fact. im sorry if you disagree.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:51 pm to bbap
quote:
the #3 player nationally would be someone behind wiggins or parker or whoever and one other player. that's just a fact. im sorry if you disagree.
No it doesn't. He never said 2013 class.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:52 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Quarterman
Is not a 2 at all. 1 and 3
And that makes no sense at all. He has the handles to play point, the length to play three and the scoring ability to play both. That means he can play the two or simply as a wing (2/3).
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:53 pm to Jwho77
quote:
And that makes no sense at all. He has the handles to play point, the length to play three and the scoring ability to play both. That means he can play the two or simply as a wing (2/3).
He isn't a shooter, which means he's not a 2.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:53 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
No it doesn't
Well it most certainly does but i dont care to argue anymore.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:53 pm to bbap
quote:
Well it most certainly does but i dont care to argue anymore.
It doesn't, sorry, everyone has disagreed with you.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:55 pm to thunderbird1100
lol you and one other guy.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:57 pm to bbap
Make that 2 possibly 3 others
Either way, you = 0, everyone else = winning
Either way, you = 0, everyone else = winning
This post was edited on 4/4/13 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:58 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
He isn't a shooter, which means he's not a 2.
Even if that analysis is set in stone (though he has a nice stroke and has shown he can be a high-volume scorer), he doesn't have to be "a shooter" to play the two. He has proven he can be a scorer/slasher. It depends on the lineup as a whole how he will be used.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 1:59 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:i feel for this kids career
KArviar Shepherd
Posted on 4/4/13 at 2:00 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Is not a 2 at all. 1 and 3
Posted on 4/4/13 at 2:00 pm to Jwho77
quote:
Even if that analysis is set in stone (though he has a nice stroke and has shown he can be a high-volume scorer), he doesn't have to be "a shooter" to play the two. He has proven he can be a scorer/slasher. It depends on the lineup as a whole how he will be used.
Dont really want a guy who cant shoot play the 2, doesn't make much sense considering our 1 and 3's arent shooters either.
Being a scorer and a being a shooter is 2 very different things. I've seen a decent bit of Quarterman, he is very shy from beyond the arc for a reason.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 2:01 pm to thunderbird1100
go through life being wrong. thats fine by me.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 2:02 pm to bbap
quote:
go through life being wrong. thats fine by me.
Whatever makes you feel better about your mistake
Posted on 4/4/13 at 2:05 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Dont really want a guy who cant shoot play the 2, doesn't make much sense considering our 1 and 3's arent shooters either.
Being a scorer and a being a shooter is 2 very different things. I've seen a decent bit of Quarterman, he is very shy from beyond the arc for a reason.
Fine, you just explained why you may not want him at the two for LSU based on overall personnel. But he can certainly play the two.
On that note, I think a backcourt of Quarterman/Stringer can be a very good combo since they can switch defensive responsibilities while Q runs the point and Stringer looks for his shots. Of course, Hickey is still the starting point.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 2:06 pm to Jwho77
quote:
Quarterman/Stringer
I think we'll see this a good deal, with Quarterman running the point.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 2:19 pm to thunderbird1100
I still like my initial starting line-up. Either way, this is going to be a very good team. I am excited at the direction JJ has us going.
Posted on 4/4/13 at 3:10 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
I hope he hasnt watched Martin.Mickey the last 2 nights because if so he must be thinking "my playing time just went from a decent bit to < >"
Well everything still hinges on job. No job and coleman will back up the 4. Which sucks cus he should be at 3 and may be missused his whole career here.
This post was edited on 4/4/13 at 3:13 pm
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News