- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Johnny Jones was 90-72 and 1 NCAA appearance. Trent Johnson 67-62
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:05 am to The Shaqtus
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:05 am to The Shaqtus
That’s just false and is based on your idiotic take saying that anyone who likes McMahon automatically loves Wade which is pure stupidity but that’s where you live.
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 10:18 am
1
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:05 am to Madking
Delusional
Liar
Hypocrisy
Liar
Hypocrisy
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:06 am to JimTiger72
Can’t refute the argument so start the ad hominem attacks. Another common trope with your kind
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:07 am to Madking
quote:
based on your idiotic take saying that anyone who likes McMahon automatically hates Wade
That’s not what he said (liar)
He disagreed with you so you called him a fan of McMahon. (Proof is on page 5)
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 10:10 am
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:09 am to Nix to Twillie
quote:
no we didn’t, jackass. Y’all just like to say this when you’re up in your feelings.
Before this week I would 100% agree with you. However, it's more difficult to presume Woodward does care about MBB all that much when he's (through the media) preemptively announced the HC who has "led" LSU to being the worst program in the SEC over the last three seasons will return for a 4th season.
I don't know if people truly understand just how bad the program has been under McMahon in his tenure. To contextualize that, unless LSU finds a way to win two more games this season, they will have had the fewest wins (overall) of any SEC program over the last 3 seasons and the fewest SEC wins during that same period. And that would include seasons by Missouri and (likely) South Carolina where neither won a single SEC game.
This is the worst 3 year stretch of LSU basketball since 1995-1997, which was the end of the Dale Brown era.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:18 am to JimTiger72
Wrong, he said he loved Wade so he couldn’t be a mcmen.
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 10:19 am
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:19 am to Madking
quote:that’s not what I did. I specifically listed the amount of bids the SEC received in 10 years in the 90s vs 5 years of present day and it’s nearly the same.
Well that’s a nice deflection but comparing it to other conferences of the time isn’t exactly comparing the two SEC eras and using one season to represent an era is also not “objective”.
You take that as “everyone else is bad” because it helps your argument.
I understand that the SEC by and large is much more invested in basketball, has much better coaches, and is doing much better in recruiting than it ever has, which has resulted in a better product. I’m using like 4 objective measurements to determine why I think the SEC is better now than the 90s.
You’re using the results of a tournament that rarely reveals the best overall team, while ignoring every other data point and saying “everyone else is bad, the SEC isn’t good.”
Do you see the flaws in your argument? Like honestly do you? Like I can see where you’re coming from and why you would think the way that you do, but there are obvious flaws in your talking points. Can you understand my view point? Are you capable of that? I truly don’t think you are.
Or are you just going to downvote this post and call me a liar for posting verifiable statistics.
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 10:27 am
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:22 am to PP7 for heisman
Ok point taken but there are 4 more teams now and the success of the conference isn’t nearly as high
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:29 am to Madking
There were only 2 more teams prior to this season though. We on average put 3-4 more teams into the tournament now, meaning those two additions yielded 2 more tournament teams, increasing the percentage of tournament teams.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:32 am to PP7 for heisman
Another huge point we’ll disagree on is I think the 2 seed UK that lost to saint peters was a great team. Their losing in the first round, in my opinion, does not show that the SEC is weaker than it was 20 years ago. The nature of the sport today is streakier than ever. One bad game against a hot shooting team and you’re fricked.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:45 am to PP7 for heisman
You had more competitive conferences back then so bids were more spread. The Big East was gutted which was arguably the top conference in basketball those days. For example the Big Ten had back to back seasons where they had 9-10 bids just a couple years back without much tourney success but nobody considered them a historically great conference. Bids don’t overshadow success or quality.
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 11:04 am
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:47 am to Madking
quote:
Wrong, he said he loved Wade so he couldn’t be a mcmen.
I've told you on multiple occasions I want McMahon fired yesterday, but you just ignore it because it doesn't fit your feeble minded narrative. It's sad.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:48 am to JimTiger72
quote:
Delusional
Liar
Hypocrisy
Ad hominem as well
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:48 am to The Shaqtus
quote:
but you just ignore it because it doesn't fit your feeble minded narrative. It's sad.
Madking caught lying again. So dishonest. So delusional.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:49 am to PP7 for heisman
No I agree with you there but being in the final 4 practically every year with multiple national title contenders for a large span of a decade is sustained greatness. Having a couple of final 4 teams over a decade just doesn’t compare.
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 11:03 am
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:50 am to The Shaqtus
lol now you’re attacking me for things you two dolts are saying. Hypocrisy is exactly right, cry about it all you want.
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 11:03 am
Posted on 2/20/25 at 11:00 am to Madking
quote:
now you’re attacking me for things you two don’t are saying
Madking will hurl insults at you and call you names when he disagrees, but as soon as you catch him in a lie, he reverts to "muh you're attacking me." Smells like hypocrisy to me.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 11:02 am to The Shaqtus
lol literally what you do
Posted on 2/20/25 at 11:06 am to Madking
quote:
lol literally what you do
I mean, if you want, I can link multiple occasions of you calling me names unsolicited just for disagreeing with you
Posted on 2/20/25 at 11:07 am to Madking
quote:
literally what you do
Liar
He literally never posted that you’re “attacking” him.
Page 8 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News